This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Niger Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Niger (assessed as Mid-importance).

I would really like to see a lot more in text citations as such for this article. I realize that the impetus for the creation is fairly recent but I feel that this could be a pretty awesome article. Do we have any references aside from the popular media?-- Woland ( talk) 04:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC) reply

This article appears to be a close copy of the CNN article posted at http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/08/14/green.sahara.ap/index.html taken from an AP press release. Since the article is taken word for word from that article or the AP release, there should be a site for it. jacksste (at) cwu.edu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.32.81 ( talk) 08:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC) reply

I've rewritten this article to use proper sources and everything. The plagiarized version was unacceptable. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 16:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The Neolithic Subpluvial site says it lasted from about 7,500-7,000 BC to about 3,500-3,000 BC, yet this site places it between 10,000 BC and 8000 BC. Were there two subpluvials there or is this a mistake?-- M.paprocki ( talk) 15:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply

See, please, Talk:Tenerians. MM ( talk) 23:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC) reply