 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
- Already sourced with a website when I found it so I removed the tag. IMO though, this is borderline forumcruft...-- Isotope23 15:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the original Childfree page suddenly spawned a load of information on other CF organisations so rather than delete the info, someone decided to de-clutter by spinning the organisation info off into other entries. In so far as ANY area of activism gets its activist groups covered, it's only fair that the same should be true of CF organisations. So I think this entry has its place, especially seeing as it's quite short.-- Mr. Analytical 22:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think this should just be merged into Childfree. If it grows there to the point it requires its own article then fine. Jake 06:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am formally proposing a merger now. If you would like to add your comments, please visit the discussion here. -- B. Wolterding 10:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Have responded over there and updated the article. Notability is not an issue. Mr. Analytical 10:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Stop Terrible Human Over Population Disasters (eCards website to limit human population growth)
- WiseArt Cybernetics (On-line artistic slideshow about limiting human population growth)
Hallo Joyous! I have a question about your message: You ask me not to add inappropriate external links to wikipedia. When I compare the 2 links I added to other existing external links on certain webpages, I see that the 'appropriate' links (i.e the ones you leave alone), are also links to external -third party- organisations, such as our European organisation (STHOPD) is too. Our non-profit organisation works with volunteers and stands for certain principles which are similar to the 'appropriate' organisations on the webpages concerned, such as: Decreasing human overpopulation in an ethical way, having no children, warnings about the worldwide consequences of overpopulation such as the destruction of ecosystems. Please explain to me what would make our links appropriate. Friendly regards, 213.84.166.83 18:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC) MetaMouse.
Its website (www.kiddingaside.net) seems to have lapsed ! 80.229.222.48 14:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
- Already sourced with a website when I found it so I removed the tag. IMO though, this is borderline forumcruft...-- Isotope23 15:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the original Childfree page suddenly spawned a load of information on other CF organisations so rather than delete the info, someone decided to de-clutter by spinning the organisation info off into other entries. In so far as ANY area of activism gets its activist groups covered, it's only fair that the same should be true of CF organisations. So I think this entry has its place, especially seeing as it's quite short.-- Mr. Analytical 22:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think this should just be merged into Childfree. If it grows there to the point it requires its own article then fine. Jake 06:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am formally proposing a merger now. If you would like to add your comments, please visit the discussion here. -- B. Wolterding 10:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Have responded over there and updated the article. Notability is not an issue. Mr. Analytical 10:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Stop Terrible Human Over Population Disasters (eCards website to limit human population growth)
- WiseArt Cybernetics (On-line artistic slideshow about limiting human population growth)
Hallo Joyous! I have a question about your message: You ask me not to add inappropriate external links to wikipedia. When I compare the 2 links I added to other existing external links on certain webpages, I see that the 'appropriate' links (i.e the ones you leave alone), are also links to external -third party- organisations, such as our European organisation (STHOPD) is too. Our non-profit organisation works with volunteers and stands for certain principles which are similar to the 'appropriate' organisations on the webpages concerned, such as: Decreasing human overpopulation in an ethical way, having no children, warnings about the worldwide consequences of overpopulation such as the destruction of ecosystems. Please explain to me what would make our links appropriate. Friendly regards, 213.84.166.83 18:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC) MetaMouse.
Its website (www.kiddingaside.net) seems to have lapsed ! 80.229.222.48 14:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)