![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I do not know how to edit the title of a page. If anyone does, please change the name of this page to "Kham Tibetan Language". The reason for this is that the leters of the title should signify correct pronunciation. The "s" comes from the Tibetan spelling and is not pronounced. Since the title is not a transliteration the "s" must be removed. I have already removed it from th body of the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodlandjustin ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 25 March 2007
Khams and A mdo have exactly the same linguistic status as Ladakhi, Dzongka, or Balti (direct descendants of Old Tibetan). People would be very upset if you suggested calling Ladakhi or Dzongka 'Tibetan dialects', but an inconsistent policy would be inconsistent. Tibetologist ( talk) 11:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
This discussion thread has been adjourned to Talk:Tibetan languages under "One language, a number of dialects". Please see the continuation of it there. Moonsell ( talk) 11:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
I've changed the definition in the introduction to read "...dialect...", not "language". Please see the "Requested move" discussion above for more on this. I've also changed other Tibetan dialect pages and asked people there to continue this discussion on this page here. This article still needs to be renamed to "Kham Tibetan Dialect", as above. Does anyone know how to do this? Moonsell ( talk) 13:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
This discussion thread has been adjourned to Talk:Tibetan languages under "One language, a number of dialects". Please see the continuation of it there. Moonsell ( talk) 11:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
It is well-recognized in literature on Tibetan dialectology that Khams is not a single dialect/language with the homogeneity like Central Tibetan or Amdo, and is better described as a cluster of dialects / languages each as distinct as CT or Amdo. Anonymous Coward 194.199.4.203 ( talk) 11:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Khams Tibetan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand "evolve to become tonal and do to not preserve" perhaps the to is redundant? Ϣere SpielChequers 20:49, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I do not know how to edit the title of a page. If anyone does, please change the name of this page to "Kham Tibetan Language". The reason for this is that the leters of the title should signify correct pronunciation. The "s" comes from the Tibetan spelling and is not pronounced. Since the title is not a transliteration the "s" must be removed. I have already removed it from th body of the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodlandjustin ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 25 March 2007
Khams and A mdo have exactly the same linguistic status as Ladakhi, Dzongka, or Balti (direct descendants of Old Tibetan). People would be very upset if you suggested calling Ladakhi or Dzongka 'Tibetan dialects', but an inconsistent policy would be inconsistent. Tibetologist ( talk) 11:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
This discussion thread has been adjourned to Talk:Tibetan languages under "One language, a number of dialects". Please see the continuation of it there. Moonsell ( talk) 11:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
I've changed the definition in the introduction to read "...dialect...", not "language". Please see the "Requested move" discussion above for more on this. I've also changed other Tibetan dialect pages and asked people there to continue this discussion on this page here. This article still needs to be renamed to "Kham Tibetan Dialect", as above. Does anyone know how to do this? Moonsell ( talk) 13:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
This discussion thread has been adjourned to Talk:Tibetan languages under "One language, a number of dialects". Please see the continuation of it there. Moonsell ( talk) 11:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
It is well-recognized in literature on Tibetan dialectology that Khams is not a single dialect/language with the homogeneity like Central Tibetan or Amdo, and is better described as a cluster of dialects / languages each as distinct as CT or Amdo. Anonymous Coward 194.199.4.203 ( talk) 11:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Khams Tibetan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand "evolve to become tonal and do to not preserve" perhaps the to is redundant? Ϣere SpielChequers 20:49, 23 June 2021 (UTC)