This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I added a reference to the
401(k) article about top heavy provisions, where the term key employee comes into play. So there's a single link now. Should I leave the now-incorrect orphan hatnote there until a few more links are added - what's the rule of thumb?
Timtempleton (
talk)
19:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)reply
"Orphan" is all or nothing. If there's one actual article (not a redirect, not a disambiguation page, not a user or talk page) leading here, then you can remove the "orphan" tag.
—Largo Plazo (
talk)
19:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I added a reference to the
401(k) article about top heavy provisions, where the term key employee comes into play. So there's a single link now. Should I leave the now-incorrect orphan hatnote there until a few more links are added - what's the rule of thumb?
Timtempleton (
talk)
19:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)reply
"Orphan" is all or nothing. If there's one actual article (not a redirect, not a disambiguation page, not a user or talk page) leading here, then you can remove the "orphan" tag.
—Largo Plazo (
talk)
19:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)reply
