![]() | Key (basketball) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
There wasn't an article for this before, seriously? -Annonymous
Before I begin I want to say that I want to help you improve the article and my comments are not personal. I am only somewhat familiar with basketball (Go Celts!) but I am trying to gauge the article on its merits.
I made some copy edits for structure, but not content.
My issues with the article as written:
In regards to the statement that the article reads poorly, here is an example:
In just reading it I am having issues understanding it, I do not know if it is jargon or lack of proof reading.
Now read this:
It conveys the same point, but reads much better and is more clear. Please notice that I added word net to the first sentence, it appears to be missing from the description and with it there the statement makes more sense. There are numerous incidents of this throughout the article.
- Jeremy ( Jerem43 02:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)) (updated 14:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC))
GA review (see here for criteria)
Cool, I'll see what it looks like later.
There should be more info in these articles, basketball is becoming a real international sport and some countries have no clue what it is. In fact the Boston Celtics and Minnesota Timberwolves played a game in London this week - the first professional game played there.
- Jeremy ( Jerem43 05:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC))
Your edits look good, I passed it. - Good Job!
-Jeremy ( Jerem43 00:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC))
Hello Howard, just checking up on this. I put a clarify statement on a new edit you recently did. It is a little hard to understand.
Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 16:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC))
Another thing, looks like the NCAA did away with the restricted area arc. -- Howard the Duck 17:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Key (basketball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Key (basketball) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
There wasn't an article for this before, seriously? -Annonymous
Before I begin I want to say that I want to help you improve the article and my comments are not personal. I am only somewhat familiar with basketball (Go Celts!) but I am trying to gauge the article on its merits.
I made some copy edits for structure, but not content.
My issues with the article as written:
In regards to the statement that the article reads poorly, here is an example:
In just reading it I am having issues understanding it, I do not know if it is jargon or lack of proof reading.
Now read this:
It conveys the same point, but reads much better and is more clear. Please notice that I added word net to the first sentence, it appears to be missing from the description and with it there the statement makes more sense. There are numerous incidents of this throughout the article.
- Jeremy ( Jerem43 02:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)) (updated 14:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC))
GA review (see here for criteria)
Cool, I'll see what it looks like later.
There should be more info in these articles, basketball is becoming a real international sport and some countries have no clue what it is. In fact the Boston Celtics and Minnesota Timberwolves played a game in London this week - the first professional game played there.
- Jeremy ( Jerem43 05:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC))
Your edits look good, I passed it. - Good Job!
-Jeremy ( Jerem43 00:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC))
Hello Howard, just checking up on this. I put a clarify statement on a new edit you recently did. It is a little hard to understand.
Jeremy ( Jerem43 ( talk) 16:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC))
Another thing, looks like the NCAA did away with the restricted area arc. -- Howard the Duck 17:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Key (basketball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)