This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business: Accounting Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Accounting task force. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles Television: The Office Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by The Office task force. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This page should not be deleted. The roles of The Office supporting characters keep expanding. on the "List of The Office characters" page, the bios were taking up too much room and we need to start making seperate pages. More detailed info will be added later. This goes for all supporting characters. I see no reason at all why this should be deleted. Puppet125 23:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC) reply

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC) reply

shouldn't it be mentioned that he takes rogaine? (drug testing)

Huh? Dwight accuses Kevin of taking Rogaine, and Kevin denies it. I see no reason to mention a one-off joke. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- Raymondc0 22:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

the way he denies it though makes it look like he's covering it up so he won't be embarrassed. In Health Care he tries to keep the fact that he has anal fissures a secret.

That's just speculation. -- Raymondc0 22:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC) reply

I think adding this fact is essential to the page. The people must know the facts of Kevin and this is a big one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathynav1234 ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC) reply

I doubt it. Both are overweight, socially-inept but musical accountants, but Keith is comatose compared with Kevin. Kransky 12:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Not sure why this contribution was reverted. Maybe it sounds like vandalism, but in "Did I Stutter?" Kevin openly admits to Pam that he finds librarians sexually arousing. I'm going to restore that information, at least until someone offers an adequate explanation of why it's incorrect. 75.3.141.227 ( talk) 07:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I don't know much about this deletion process so I don't really know what I'm supposed to do but I see no reason why this should be deleted. It is an article about a character from The Office, it is a lengthy page, and it does not look sloppy. Puppet125 ( talk) 17:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply

But it lacks assertion of notability via secondary, reliable sources, as per WP:N. Therefor, the content should not be here (it should be in the list of characters, as the best). Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^{( talk)} 17:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Since someone objects to outright deletion, I propose merging the content into the List of Characters. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^{( talk)} 14:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC) reply

This should definitely be merged. The is almost completely an in-universe plot summary. -- Torsodog ^Talk 20:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC) reply