GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Khazar2 ( talk · contribs) 04:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Christine, assuming you wouldn't mind another review from me so soon, I'd be glad to take this one. (If you'd rather have a fresher pair of eyes on your work, though, I won't be the least offended to hand this off to someone else.) Little Miss Khazar is just starting to recognize Elmo, so Kevin Clash's voice is a pretty regular feature of my world right now! Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days... -- Khazar2 ( talk) 04:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
As appears to be your standard, this is terrific work. I particularly want to thank you for helping to "ride herd" on this one during the Clash resignation debacle. I remember the article then--a few lines about Elmo and a few paragraphs about the scandal--and this is a much better balance.
Anyway, like last time, I've made some minor copyedits that you're welcome to revert if you disagree with them. Other suggestions that I'm less sure about I've listed here.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Pass |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Khazar2 ( talk · contribs) 04:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Christine, assuming you wouldn't mind another review from me so soon, I'd be glad to take this one. (If you'd rather have a fresher pair of eyes on your work, though, I won't be the least offended to hand this off to someone else.) Little Miss Khazar is just starting to recognize Elmo, so Kevin Clash's voice is a pretty regular feature of my world right now! Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days... -- Khazar2 ( talk) 04:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
As appears to be your standard, this is terrific work. I particularly want to thank you for helping to "ride herd" on this one during the Clash resignation debacle. I remember the article then--a few lines about Elmo and a few paragraphs about the scandal--and this is a much better balance.
Anyway, like last time, I've made some minor copyedits that you're welcome to revert if you disagree with them. Other suggestions that I'm less sure about I've listed here.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Pass |