This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <she has enough sales to land on the billboard hot 100, she must be significant, no? See this link: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150215726573044&set=a.10150215726383044.337964.5958573043&type=1&ref=nf>. — JessT9090 ( talk) 02:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC) >. — JessT9090 ( talk) 02:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <All I see are facts. Facts with citations. Keep.>. — HpotterJiggles ( talk) 03:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Doing some research of my own Mike, here are my conclusions: (1) memagazineonline.com IS a website.. however, it is only cited because it has the full pdf version of the actual, physical Me Magazine issue the singer in question was published in, in summer 2010. (2) acharts seems to be a reliable archive of all the past Billboard charts. Once again, with no disrespect to Orangemike, I say, KEEP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HpotterJiggles ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Hey Mike. You said that http://acharts.us doesn't strike you as a reliable source, however, this same source is being referenced in MANY Wikipedia articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_number-one_albums_of_2009_%28Australia%29; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_Bitch; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoveGame; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dutch_Top_40_number-one_singles_of_2010; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_%28band%29; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fame; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dutch_Top_40_number-one_singles_of_2011; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharleen_Spiteri; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_singles_which_have_spent_the_most_weeks_on_the_UK_Singles_Chart; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paparazzi_%28Lady_Gaga_song%29; and there are hundreds more. My question for you, why is this a legitimate source for so many other articles but not for Ketsia? HpotterJiggles.
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <Using sales data from Nielsen SoundScan Inc [1], the Quebec Government ranked her as having the 15th most sold Quebecois digital track in 2010, for her song "Possible" [2].>. — PJsmth ( talk) 15:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
References
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Ketsia.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
I put in some information about her because the former version just sounded like advertisement. The information I got isn't very informative. I recently have a slight browser problem but there is not much I could find about her. Moreover, all the information on her official website or on K-train is the same. Same for the social web. Is she actually famous? -- Gib zwei ( talk) 22:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
She has a new album out, you'll find it on her website.
As no further information came during the last months and her popularity remained the same, I have doubts that this isn't a candidate for deletion. Should the article be deleted? Gib zwei ( talk) 06:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ketsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ketsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <she has enough sales to land on the billboard hot 100, she must be significant, no? See this link: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150215726573044&set=a.10150215726383044.337964.5958573043&type=1&ref=nf>. — JessT9090 ( talk) 02:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC) >. — JessT9090 ( talk) 02:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <All I see are facts. Facts with citations. Keep.>. — HpotterJiggles ( talk) 03:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Doing some research of my own Mike, here are my conclusions: (1) memagazineonline.com IS a website.. however, it is only cited because it has the full pdf version of the actual, physical Me Magazine issue the singer in question was published in, in summer 2010. (2) acharts seems to be a reliable archive of all the past Billboard charts. Once again, with no disrespect to Orangemike, I say, KEEP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HpotterJiggles ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC) Hey Mike. You said that http://acharts.us doesn't strike you as a reliable source, however, this same source is being referenced in MANY Wikipedia articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_number-one_albums_of_2009_%28Australia%29; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_Bitch; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoveGame; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dutch_Top_40_number-one_singles_of_2010; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_%28band%29; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fame; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dutch_Top_40_number-one_singles_of_2011; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharleen_Spiteri; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_singles_which_have_spent_the_most_weeks_on_the_UK_Singles_Chart; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paparazzi_%28Lady_Gaga_song%29; and there are hundreds more. My question for you, why is this a legitimate source for so many other articles but not for Ketsia? HpotterJiggles.
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <Using sales data from Nielsen SoundScan Inc [1], the Quebec Government ranked her as having the 15th most sold Quebecois digital track in 2010, for her song "Possible" [2].>. — PJsmth ( talk) 15:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
References
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Ketsia.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC) |
I put in some information about her because the former version just sounded like advertisement. The information I got isn't very informative. I recently have a slight browser problem but there is not much I could find about her. Moreover, all the information on her official website or on K-train is the same. Same for the social web. Is she actually famous? -- Gib zwei ( talk) 22:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
She has a new album out, you'll find it on her website.
As no further information came during the last months and her popularity remained the same, I have doubts that this isn't a candidate for deletion. Should the article be deleted? Gib zwei ( talk) 06:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ketsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ketsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)