This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Keshab Chandra Dash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (This page doesn't promote anything. If someone believes that this page has some promotional text, please highlight those. As Sanskrit Literature is a niche area, I just narrated my contributions to this field. All of the above furnished information are true to the best of my knowledge.
Hence request to highlight who marked this page for speedy deletion and why? As this is the first post it might be obvious that some text has some different meanings. Please highlight them so that I can delete those.) -- Prof.keshab.ch.dash ( talk) 18:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
What is your definition of notable in wiki terms. I have had lot of my friends whose articles are already published. I've given their names below: /info/en/?search=Kala_Nath_Shastry /info/en/?search=Bhaskaracharya_Tripathi /info/en/?search=Om_Prakash_Pande /info/en/?search=Mithila_Prasad_Tripathi I'm not sure what your criteria to be notable. Can you be little precise?What knowledge you have in Sanskrit Literature. How many people you know in this field. Please do a through research before passing your remark. You can ask any notable person in Sanskrit Literature field in India and you will get your answer.
I'm note here trying to highlight/promote anything here.
I would kindly reques Wikipedia NOT to give the person who is reviewing currently on this page. I request a legitimate review of my account NOT by a person with limited exposure to review about Sanskrit Literature field.
Hope my request will be heard.-- Prof.keshab.ch.dash ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (To my knowledge this doesnot have any promotional topics. Many of my friends Wiki already exist. I just highlighted the contributions I made towards Sanskrit Literature. If I'm NOT notable, I wouldn't have received the awards which are highest in the field of Sanskrit in India. I'm not sure what's your criteria for genuinely notable. I see these my friends listed in Wiki
/info/en/?search=Kala_Nath_Shastry /info/en/?search=Bhaskaracharya_Tripathi /info/en/?search=Om_Prakash_Pande /info/en/?search=Mithila_Prasad_Tripathi
The user who has reviewed the page does NOT' have any clue about the field and who are renowned and who are not. I'm afraid that this kind of review might discourage people to see Wiki? The esteemed user is bonadea. How come someone from Sweden review the article of a Poet in India and then justify his/her point. This is ridiculous. I would challenge her to talk to me few lines on Sanskrit Litereture and Indian Culture, Sahitya Academy Awards etc.
Anyway terribly fed up and frustrated with the approach of review and how someone is marking an Article to be deleted. ) -- Prof.keshab.ch.dash ( talk) 19:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
I know Professor Dash since long time and I had the privilege to pursue Ph.D under him.
If there is anything can be done to make this article improvised, I can help.
You can find is information on blogging site as well. http://profkeshabchandradash.blogspot.com/p/book-preview.html
Also this is where he worked. http://www.sjsv.nic.in/
And he is no doubt a notable poet and philosopher in Modern Sanskrit language. And after all who won Odiya Sahitya Academy ( /info/en/?search=Odisha_Sahitya_Academy_Award) and Sanskrit Sahitya Academy ( /info/en/?search=List_of_Sahitya_Akademi_Award_winners_for_Sanskrit) they are deemed as Notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhumita.03 ( talk • contribs) 21:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
I've read many books from Prof Dash's bookshelf and disappointed to see his work is being questioned. Moreover, it was being reviewed by folks who has no clue about his contribution to Sanskrit literature. I kindly request to remove the unnecessary information on the top:
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Keshab Chandra Dash article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (This page doesn't promote anything. If someone believes that this page has some promotional text, please highlight those. As Sanskrit Literature is a niche area, I just narrated my contributions to this field. All of the above furnished information are true to the best of my knowledge.
Hence request to highlight who marked this page for speedy deletion and why? As this is the first post it might be obvious that some text has some different meanings. Please highlight them so that I can delete those.) -- Prof.keshab.ch.dash ( talk) 18:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
What is your definition of notable in wiki terms. I have had lot of my friends whose articles are already published. I've given their names below: /info/en/?search=Kala_Nath_Shastry /info/en/?search=Bhaskaracharya_Tripathi /info/en/?search=Om_Prakash_Pande /info/en/?search=Mithila_Prasad_Tripathi I'm not sure what your criteria to be notable. Can you be little precise?What knowledge you have in Sanskrit Literature. How many people you know in this field. Please do a through research before passing your remark. You can ask any notable person in Sanskrit Literature field in India and you will get your answer.
I'm note here trying to highlight/promote anything here.
I would kindly reques Wikipedia NOT to give the person who is reviewing currently on this page. I request a legitimate review of my account NOT by a person with limited exposure to review about Sanskrit Literature field.
Hope my request will be heard.-- Prof.keshab.ch.dash ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (To my knowledge this doesnot have any promotional topics. Many of my friends Wiki already exist. I just highlighted the contributions I made towards Sanskrit Literature. If I'm NOT notable, I wouldn't have received the awards which are highest in the field of Sanskrit in India. I'm not sure what's your criteria for genuinely notable. I see these my friends listed in Wiki
/info/en/?search=Kala_Nath_Shastry /info/en/?search=Bhaskaracharya_Tripathi /info/en/?search=Om_Prakash_Pande /info/en/?search=Mithila_Prasad_Tripathi
The user who has reviewed the page does NOT' have any clue about the field and who are renowned and who are not. I'm afraid that this kind of review might discourage people to see Wiki? The esteemed user is bonadea. How come someone from Sweden review the article of a Poet in India and then justify his/her point. This is ridiculous. I would challenge her to talk to me few lines on Sanskrit Litereture and Indian Culture, Sahitya Academy Awards etc.
Anyway terribly fed up and frustrated with the approach of review and how someone is marking an Article to be deleted. ) -- Prof.keshab.ch.dash ( talk) 19:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
I know Professor Dash since long time and I had the privilege to pursue Ph.D under him.
If there is anything can be done to make this article improvised, I can help.
You can find is information on blogging site as well. http://profkeshabchandradash.blogspot.com/p/book-preview.html
Also this is where he worked. http://www.sjsv.nic.in/
And he is no doubt a notable poet and philosopher in Modern Sanskrit language. And after all who won Odiya Sahitya Academy ( /info/en/?search=Odisha_Sahitya_Academy_Award) and Sanskrit Sahitya Academy ( /info/en/?search=List_of_Sahitya_Akademi_Award_winners_for_Sanskrit) they are deemed as Notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhumita.03 ( talk • contribs) 21:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
I've read many books from Prof Dash's bookshelf and disappointed to see his work is being questioned. Moreover, it was being reviewed by folks who has no clue about his contribution to Sanskrit literature. I kindly request to remove the unnecessary information on the top: