GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 03:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll give this a review shortly.
Wizardman
03:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found with the article:
The article is in good shape for an AFC, but as a good article, it needs a large amount of work that would amount to a complete restructuring. On the plus side, the sourcing is pretty good, so you at least have that foundation to work off of. As a result, I'm going to have to fail this without a hold, as it simply needs too much work. Wizardman 03:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 03:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll give this a review shortly.
Wizardman
03:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found with the article:
The article is in good shape for an AFC, but as a good article, it needs a large amount of work that would amount to a complete restructuring. On the plus side, the sourcing is pretty good, so you at least have that foundation to work off of. As a result, I'm going to have to fail this without a hold, as it simply needs too much work. Wizardman 03:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)