This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The section stating that a discussion with Michael Marcantonio and political expediency convinced her to switch her personal beliefs is unsubstantiated as well as uncorroborated. Even though organizations such as the New York Times and The Guardian ran with it, the pieces read like gossip magazines. The article should at least state that this is only alleged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.4.205 ( talk) 16:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
What is this supposed to mean?
"... she began supporting Trump after receiving his advice over cocktails."
From whom? From Trump? From someone else? This should be deleted if it cannot be written clearly.
Also, the parenthetical "(1L)" after a mention of her first year at law school is entirely gratuitous. 2601:200:C000:1A0:C22:2D03:4771:E329 ( talk) 11:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
It is sexist innuendo leveled against a woman who was a Harvard Law graduate in the top 1% of her class and who previously studied politics at Georgetown and Oxford. "The Guardian" ran with this because this is what "Reliable Sources" do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.200.200.226 ( talk) 16:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
The section stating that a discussion with Michael Marcantonio and political expediency convinced her to switch her personal beliefs is unsubstantiated as well as uncorroborated. Even though organizations such as the New York Times and The Guardian ran with it, the pieces read like gossip magazines. The article should at least state that this is only alleged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.4.205 ( talk) 16:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
What is this supposed to mean?
"... she began supporting Trump after receiving his advice over cocktails."
From whom? From Trump? From someone else? This should be deleted if it cannot be written clearly.
Also, the parenthetical "(1L)" after a mention of her first year at law school is entirely gratuitous. 2601:200:C000:1A0:C22:2D03:4771:E329 ( talk) 11:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
It is sexist innuendo leveled against a woman who was a Harvard Law graduate in the top 1% of her class and who previously studied politics at Georgetown and Oxford. "The Guardian" ran with this because this is what "Reliable Sources" do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.200.200.226 ( talk) 16:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)