This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katrina Karkazis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://m.sciencemag.org/content/348/6237/858.fullWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Seemplez: and @ 85.131.127.116:, don't you think it might be condign to come up with an amended list of publications and include that in the article, rather than reverting each other between a comically large list of publications and none whatsoever? jp× g 07:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Should a list of the subect's publications be included in the article at all, and if so, how many of them? Two editors, Seemplez ( talk · contribs) and 85.131.127.116 ( talk · contribs), are in disagreement about this issue. 85 wants to remove them all, whereas Seemplez has been open to including an amended list with the most relevant (or most highly-cited) publications. The original removal of the list can be seen at Special:Diff/980380715. I originally saw these edits and reversions while patrolling Special:RecentChanges, and made one revert (when WP:3RR was exceeded) but have subsequently observed a lack of consensus (there are points to be made on either side). I haven't got much to say besides the vague and noncommittal suggestion of a reduced bibliography -- both parties have been going at it on Seemplez's user talk page and it doesn't seem like they're going to reach consensus without assistance. jp× g 09:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katrina Karkazis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://m.sciencemag.org/content/348/6237/858.fullWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Seemplez: and @ 85.131.127.116:, don't you think it might be condign to come up with an amended list of publications and include that in the article, rather than reverting each other between a comically large list of publications and none whatsoever? jp× g 07:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Should a list of the subect's publications be included in the article at all, and if so, how many of them? Two editors, Seemplez ( talk · contribs) and 85.131.127.116 ( talk · contribs), are in disagreement about this issue. 85 wants to remove them all, whereas Seemplez has been open to including an amended list with the most relevant (or most highly-cited) publications. The original removal of the list can be seen at Special:Diff/980380715. I originally saw these edits and reversions while patrolling Special:RecentChanges, and made one revert (when WP:3RR was exceeded) but have subsequently observed a lack of consensus (there are points to be made on either side). I haven't got much to say besides the vague and noncommittal suggestion of a reduced bibliography -- both parties have been going at it on Seemplez's user talk page and it doesn't seem like they're going to reach consensus without assistance. jp× g 09:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)