![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
It seems this article was created more with an intent to spread the "ideology" of KRV than as an honest, neutral encyclopaedic article. I tried to restore it to a factual version but apparently some people weren't too happy with that. While I appreciate the addition of new information to the article by the same user, there are some NPOV issues that I find stick out like a sore thumb. Let me list them out line-by-line as my good friend here asked me to do:
Let's remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox and avoid inserting unnecessary bias into articles. Thanks, Max - You were saying? 16:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Max - You were saying? 16:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Check changes and stop making non-NPOV/Blatant PoV comments such as 'criminal actions', etc. Gowdramesh 14:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Gowdramesh 02:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Gowdramesh 17:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:KRV logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is the same propaganda stinkfest that it was months ago when I posted by first objections. Tried to clean it but apparently it has touched some nerves again amongst KRV enthusiasts. Alright, tags will have to do for now, until someone comes to their senses and decides to clean up the mess. - Max - You were saying? 18:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment from Rajachandra ( left on the article page): It is absurd to create a nexus between the death of the much revered Late A.N.Krishna Rao who died in 1971 with the ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಕ್ಷಣಾ ವೇದಿಕೆ founded by TA Narayana Gowda who was born in 1967 ! There were many known Kannada Torch bearers like Vatal before Gowda. Where as ANK was colossus and a literary giant, Gowda is known as a rabble-rouser adopting arm twisting methods to achieve his goals. Kindly do your research and amend the article suitably.
Comment from Halli.haida
There is no evidence where you can call Karnataka Rakshana Vedike a militant organization. Don't try to push your opinion down everyones throat. Has any competant authority declared Karnataka Rakshana Vedike as a militant organization. Here competant authority means 1. Government of Karnataka 2. High court of Karnataka 3. Government of India 4. Supreme court of India 5. United Nations Organization
Show us proof where any or all of these bodies declaring Karnataka Rakshana Vedike as a militant organization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halli.haida ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Article has been tagged with POV since March 2010, but there seems to be no reason provided in the Talk page as mentioned. Also, much contents have been cleaned up. So I'll remove the tag in 7 days from now. - Niri / ನಿರಿ 09:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Karnataka Rakshana Vedike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
We have seen people editing this article by using words like "Linguistic chauvinistic". We request not to use such terms about a profound organisation. We request wikipedia to take necessary actions against such accounts by blocking them permanently who are using wikipedia to degrade an organization like Karnataka Rakshana vedike. Wikipedia cannot be a platform to spread hatred and prejudge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaygnr1985 ( talk • contribs) 12:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
It seems this article was created more with an intent to spread the "ideology" of KRV than as an honest, neutral encyclopaedic article. I tried to restore it to a factual version but apparently some people weren't too happy with that. While I appreciate the addition of new information to the article by the same user, there are some NPOV issues that I find stick out like a sore thumb. Let me list them out line-by-line as my good friend here asked me to do:
Let's remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox and avoid inserting unnecessary bias into articles. Thanks, Max - You were saying? 16:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Max - You were saying? 16:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Check changes and stop making non-NPOV/Blatant PoV comments such as 'criminal actions', etc. Gowdramesh 14:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Gowdramesh 02:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Gowdramesh 17:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:KRV logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is the same propaganda stinkfest that it was months ago when I posted by first objections. Tried to clean it but apparently it has touched some nerves again amongst KRV enthusiasts. Alright, tags will have to do for now, until someone comes to their senses and decides to clean up the mess. - Max - You were saying? 18:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment from Rajachandra ( left on the article page): It is absurd to create a nexus between the death of the much revered Late A.N.Krishna Rao who died in 1971 with the ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಕ್ಷಣಾ ವೇದಿಕೆ founded by TA Narayana Gowda who was born in 1967 ! There were many known Kannada Torch bearers like Vatal before Gowda. Where as ANK was colossus and a literary giant, Gowda is known as a rabble-rouser adopting arm twisting methods to achieve his goals. Kindly do your research and amend the article suitably.
Comment from Halli.haida
There is no evidence where you can call Karnataka Rakshana Vedike a militant organization. Don't try to push your opinion down everyones throat. Has any competant authority declared Karnataka Rakshana Vedike as a militant organization. Here competant authority means 1. Government of Karnataka 2. High court of Karnataka 3. Government of India 4. Supreme court of India 5. United Nations Organization
Show us proof where any or all of these bodies declaring Karnataka Rakshana Vedike as a militant organization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halli.haida ( talk • contribs) 05:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Article has been tagged with POV since March 2010, but there seems to be no reason provided in the Talk page as mentioned. Also, much contents have been cleaned up. So I'll remove the tag in 7 days from now. - Niri / ನಿರಿ 09:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Karnataka Rakshana Vedike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
We have seen people editing this article by using words like "Linguistic chauvinistic". We request not to use such terms about a profound organisation. We request wikipedia to take necessary actions against such accounts by blocking them permanently who are using wikipedia to degrade an organization like Karnataka Rakshana vedike. Wikipedia cannot be a platform to spread hatred and prejudge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaygnr1985 ( talk • contribs) 12:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)