This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kapurthala article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
-- Ekabhishek ( talk) 18:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Although the Kaputhala online website states the origins of this state to Jaiselmer, I have not yet found any source to coroborate thia. I have checked many texts. Many point to possibly Nawab Kapur Singh. Some help would be welcome. Thanks -- Sikh-History 13:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
In the Summary Box the population is stated as 754,522 (2010), whereas the Demographics paragraph says 84,361 in 2001.
A population increase of almost factor ten in ten years seems quite unusual to me. If it is no typo, a paragraph about this fact would be nice. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.14.81.76 ( talk) 09:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kapurthala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Kapurthala article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
-- Ekabhishek ( talk) 18:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Although the Kaputhala online website states the origins of this state to Jaiselmer, I have not yet found any source to coroborate thia. I have checked many texts. Many point to possibly Nawab Kapur Singh. Some help would be welcome. Thanks -- Sikh-History 13:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
In the Summary Box the population is stated as 754,522 (2010), whereas the Demographics paragraph says 84,361 in 2001.
A population increase of almost factor ten in ten years seems quite unusual to me. If it is no typo, a paragraph about this fact would be nice. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.14.81.76 ( talk) 09:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kapurthala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)