This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Kapoor family is not of Pathan origin.Kapoor family is of Punjabi origin of Khatri caste.So irequest you to write this. 122.163.208.219 ( talk) 22:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I too have pointed this out, and as such, ammended the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.201.240 ( talk) 16:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC) there are no hindu,s in pathan people, someof hindus lives with pathans inpakistan and afghanistan, tey were slave of them from hundred of years,or some of them were traders and went there
I have removed the following statement:
The head of the Kapoor Dynasty, known as "Her Godliness Eshita Kapoor" is the forerunner of Bollywood cinema. She has acted/directed/produced/and written over 6000 Bollyfood films in her lifetime.
While it may not be impossible to have acted in over 6000 bollywood films, it it, at the very least NEAR impossible. That was what grabbed my attention at first. Having then looked up this so-called "Eshita Kapoor", I was not surprised when I couldn't find any reference to her. This is surely vandalism -- Maurice45 ( talk) 10:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Sources like this(cited by others user too) clearly says that Kapoor family hails from PESHAWAR not Lyallpur, the family shifted to Lyallpur for one generation after which they shifted to Mumbai, but the family is originally from PESHAWAR. Winston786 ( talk) 14:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Quoting from the source
"Raj Kapoor told me that his family hailed originally from Peshawar, but his grandfather retired as Tahsildar from Samundri and settled there"
It categorically says that the family originally hails from Peshawar and and also tells about the relation of the family with the Lyallpur that some editors are confusing as their original hometown. Not to mention that Raj Kapoor himself was born and brought up in Peshawar. Winston786 ( talk) 10:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
So? The mentioned a link in which the family member himself categorically mentions them hailing originally from Peshawar and then shifting to Lyallpur only for one generation ...is there any source that suggests that they shifted to Peshawar from Lyallpur, I guess no...and btw stop this WP:3RR thing(which works only for 24 hrs btw, I know it better than you, its one of ur gimmicks to deviate from the topic I guess. I don't think there is any confusion that the family is from PESHAWAR and not Samundari/Lyallpur or any other place. I suggest you change ur confrontational attitude and your habbit of pushing Pro-Punjab POV in everything. Winston786 ( talk) 12:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Its not an "obscure link", it was there in the Daily Times (Pakistan) in 2006, Daily times is a well known Pakistani Newspaper. Winston786 ( talk) 12:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You are confusing yourself and me, Rajput is a sanskrit term but there are Punjabi Rajputs, Rajasthani Rajputs, Himachali Rajputs, Gujarati Rajputs etc, similarly if one is Kapoor or a Khatri, it doesn't mean that he is from Punjab only. Not to mentioned in this case family categorically says that they are originally from Peshawar. Winston786 ( talk) 12:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Whoa, this discussion was about their home town, was their ORIGINAL home town PESHAWAR?...Yes. There is no record of the family before their days in Peshawar, so nothing can be established regarding that period. Winston786 ( talk) 13:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Does this mean that we can safely write that the family's original home town is Peshawar and certainly not Lyallpur? Plz finish this one before moving on to the other one. First answer, is there original hometown(verified) Peshawar or not? Winston786 ( talk) 13:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
His father, Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor, was a sub-inspector of police. Prithviraj received his initial education at Khalsa College Lyallpur and at Lahore. His paternal grandfather, Dewan Keshavmal, was a powerful influence during his childhood. Baseshwarnath was posted at Peshawar, and so Prithviraj received his higher education at the Edwardes College, Peshawar, Pakistan and joined a one year programme in Law to become a Lawyer. It was here that his talents on stage first received expression.
There are sources that state Pritviraj was born in Peshawar:
They are not "contradictory" sources...all of them tells about their time in Samundari. This source is clearly covering that too at the same time mentioning about their native place. Its a source with a wider range, nothing is contradicting it. Winston786 ( talk) 14:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You have mentioned the sources which tells about the family's time in Lyallpur, as I said
This source here is covering all that and is clearly saying that the family hailed originally from Peshawar, but Raj Kapoor's grandfather retired as Tahsildar from Samundri.
Winston786 (
talk)
14:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
We are discussing the native city, that can be verified so what their forefathers did in 18th or 19th century is not even a matter of consideration(not to mention that all that will be suggestive and cannot be proved) why don't u read the heading? Winston786 ( talk) 18:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
No, it is clearly mentioned hear that the family hails from Peshawar, it shifted to Samundari(for a Job apparently) and then moved back to Peshawar, eventually ending up in Mumbai. It is very categorically mentioned, the question of this discussion that "Peshawar or Lyallpur" is answered in an elaborated manner in no other source. Winston786 ( talk) 19:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You know it might be helpful for each side to write down what they want the section to say, because it's not entirely clear what each side wants the section to read.-- Profitoftruth85 ( talk) 22:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I've been asked for some neutral input into this conversation. I've reviewed the discussion and the cited online sources. My initial reactions to the question "what is the hometown" are:
Point 2 may seem flippant because it obviously matters greatly to the few editors involved in the conversation, but my point is: will all this intellectual effort actually result in a significant improvement in the article? My preference in this situation would be to state the facts, citing sources, noting contradictions but not elaborating on them, and leave the reader to draw conclusions. That inclines me towards the format given by Winston786 and Dianna; SH's "seems to have" sounds to me like WP:OR.
Back to my first point: the origins of the family are lost in time; that's normally the case - families don't usually have a clear starting point. An exception would be when an individual rose from obscurity to prominence and founded a dynasty, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. So when Raj Kapoor is quoted as saying "that his family hailed originally from Peshawar" I immediately question the meaning of "originally" - how do you define an origin in an evolutionary continuum? A related question is: what does he mean by "his family"? He could be referring to the family in which he grew up i.e. his parents and grandparents, or to an inherited knowledge of a longer line of ancestors. We don't actually know what he meant and it would be against WP:OR to try to draw conclusions, however well we believe we understand the personal and cultural values he would have attached to the words he used. I am uncomfortable with stating as fact Ishtiaq Ahmed's recollection of what Raj Kapoor said when what he said is so clearly missing context vital to its unambiguous understanding. Raj Kapoor's words are valuable as a description of his identification of his family's roots, but I feel they should be presented clearly in that context; we don't know what other family members would have said on the subject and it would be unwarranted to apply Raj's words -- and the emotions, memories, temporal context and self-identity that underlie them -- to the family as a whole.
I hope that gives some food for thought that may lead to a consensus (if only a consensus that you all disagree with me!). -- Timberframe ( talk) 16:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Winston786, you say that we here on WP are supposed to write facts and work for making sure they are correct. I agree, but only to the extent that wiki has policies on the type of sources we can cite, and the need to be able to verify that what we write accurately reflects what those sources say. Strange as it may seem (and some editors really do struggle with the concept) WP does not set out to be a definitive textbook, and nowhere that I've seen is there a WP policy on making sure that the facts that we write about are correct. Essentially, the facts that WP editors write are that "such a source says this", if we start to go down the road of trying to validate the facts that the sources write about we inevitably end up introducing our own perception of what is "correct" or crossing the line of WP:OR. I think this may be the underlying raison d'etre of this discussion: you all appear to agree what sources exist and what they say; you're disagreeing about how to synthesise their content. -- Timberframe ( talk) 17:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Text "Film" ignored (
help); Text "The Guardian" ignored (
help)
{{
cite book}}
: |edition=
has extra text (
help); Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite book}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Get over with the pending one first. Winston786 ( talk) 13:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Some of the sources Sikh-History used I was unable to get to load on my computer to review them, so sorry.
-- Diannaa ( Talk) 21:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Prithviraj Kapoor, the first of the family to pursue acting, was born in 1906 in the town of Samundri near Lyallpur, in the Punjab province of Pakistan. [1] Prithviraj's grandfather, Dewan Keshavmal Kapoor, worked as a Tehsildar in Samundri [2] and his father, Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor, was a sub-inspector of police stationed at Peshawar. [3] [4] In 1928 Prithviraj left Peshawar for Mumbai to become an actor. [5] [6] He worked as an extra for the first few days in the silent film Challenge (1929). Later during an audition, he was selected to play the male lead in the film Cinema Girl. [7]
We have conflicting reports as to whether the home town was Samundri or Peshawar, so I would like to leave it out. Sikh-History has some sources that say they are Punjabi but I was unable to get them to load, so I am unable to verify that. So I would like to leave the ethnicity out as well until we are sure what to put. -- Diannaa ( Talk) 22:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
References
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Shammi Kapoor.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
|
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC) |
Some user is adding that Kapoors are "Hindu Pathans", what does that even mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PISCOSOUR786 ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
It means that they practice Hinduism and are of Pathan origin, tracing their roots to the city of Peshawar.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kapoor family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kapoor family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Given that Wikipedia is not a genealogy, I propose inserting the word "Notable" in front of the section heading "Members of the Kapoor family" and removing all entries for members without Wikipedia articles. Largoplazo ( talk) 21:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
There are many lines which are totally inclined to appreciate this family. Seems like such statements and words like "*the only real dynasty in in Indian Industry*, "the patriarch"(for Raj Kapoor), etc. has been included by their affinities. This page urgently needs neutralisation! Gyaansevak ( talk) 15:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
In the case Surinder Kapoor is the paternal cousin of Prithviraj Kapoor, how is he related to Basheshwarnath Kapoor? Jay (Talk) 10:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Kapoor family is not of Pathan origin.Kapoor family is of Punjabi origin of Khatri caste.So irequest you to write this. 122.163.208.219 ( talk) 22:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I too have pointed this out, and as such, ammended the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.201.240 ( talk) 16:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC) there are no hindu,s in pathan people, someof hindus lives with pathans inpakistan and afghanistan, tey were slave of them from hundred of years,or some of them were traders and went there
I have removed the following statement:
The head of the Kapoor Dynasty, known as "Her Godliness Eshita Kapoor" is the forerunner of Bollywood cinema. She has acted/directed/produced/and written over 6000 Bollyfood films in her lifetime.
While it may not be impossible to have acted in over 6000 bollywood films, it it, at the very least NEAR impossible. That was what grabbed my attention at first. Having then looked up this so-called "Eshita Kapoor", I was not surprised when I couldn't find any reference to her. This is surely vandalism -- Maurice45 ( talk) 10:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Sources like this(cited by others user too) clearly says that Kapoor family hails from PESHAWAR not Lyallpur, the family shifted to Lyallpur for one generation after which they shifted to Mumbai, but the family is originally from PESHAWAR. Winston786 ( talk) 14:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Quoting from the source
"Raj Kapoor told me that his family hailed originally from Peshawar, but his grandfather retired as Tahsildar from Samundri and settled there"
It categorically says that the family originally hails from Peshawar and and also tells about the relation of the family with the Lyallpur that some editors are confusing as their original hometown. Not to mention that Raj Kapoor himself was born and brought up in Peshawar. Winston786 ( talk) 10:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
So? The mentioned a link in which the family member himself categorically mentions them hailing originally from Peshawar and then shifting to Lyallpur only for one generation ...is there any source that suggests that they shifted to Peshawar from Lyallpur, I guess no...and btw stop this WP:3RR thing(which works only for 24 hrs btw, I know it better than you, its one of ur gimmicks to deviate from the topic I guess. I don't think there is any confusion that the family is from PESHAWAR and not Samundari/Lyallpur or any other place. I suggest you change ur confrontational attitude and your habbit of pushing Pro-Punjab POV in everything. Winston786 ( talk) 12:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Its not an "obscure link", it was there in the Daily Times (Pakistan) in 2006, Daily times is a well known Pakistani Newspaper. Winston786 ( talk) 12:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You are confusing yourself and me, Rajput is a sanskrit term but there are Punjabi Rajputs, Rajasthani Rajputs, Himachali Rajputs, Gujarati Rajputs etc, similarly if one is Kapoor or a Khatri, it doesn't mean that he is from Punjab only. Not to mentioned in this case family categorically says that they are originally from Peshawar. Winston786 ( talk) 12:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Whoa, this discussion was about their home town, was their ORIGINAL home town PESHAWAR?...Yes. There is no record of the family before their days in Peshawar, so nothing can be established regarding that period. Winston786 ( talk) 13:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Does this mean that we can safely write that the family's original home town is Peshawar and certainly not Lyallpur? Plz finish this one before moving on to the other one. First answer, is there original hometown(verified) Peshawar or not? Winston786 ( talk) 13:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
His father, Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor, was a sub-inspector of police. Prithviraj received his initial education at Khalsa College Lyallpur and at Lahore. His paternal grandfather, Dewan Keshavmal, was a powerful influence during his childhood. Baseshwarnath was posted at Peshawar, and so Prithviraj received his higher education at the Edwardes College, Peshawar, Pakistan and joined a one year programme in Law to become a Lawyer. It was here that his talents on stage first received expression.
There are sources that state Pritviraj was born in Peshawar:
They are not "contradictory" sources...all of them tells about their time in Samundari. This source is clearly covering that too at the same time mentioning about their native place. Its a source with a wider range, nothing is contradicting it. Winston786 ( talk) 14:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You have mentioned the sources which tells about the family's time in Lyallpur, as I said
This source here is covering all that and is clearly saying that the family hailed originally from Peshawar, but Raj Kapoor's grandfather retired as Tahsildar from Samundri.
Winston786 (
talk)
14:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
We are discussing the native city, that can be verified so what their forefathers did in 18th or 19th century is not even a matter of consideration(not to mention that all that will be suggestive and cannot be proved) why don't u read the heading? Winston786 ( talk) 18:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
No, it is clearly mentioned hear that the family hails from Peshawar, it shifted to Samundari(for a Job apparently) and then moved back to Peshawar, eventually ending up in Mumbai. It is very categorically mentioned, the question of this discussion that "Peshawar or Lyallpur" is answered in an elaborated manner in no other source. Winston786 ( talk) 19:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
You know it might be helpful for each side to write down what they want the section to say, because it's not entirely clear what each side wants the section to read.-- Profitoftruth85 ( talk) 22:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
I've been asked for some neutral input into this conversation. I've reviewed the discussion and the cited online sources. My initial reactions to the question "what is the hometown" are:
Point 2 may seem flippant because it obviously matters greatly to the few editors involved in the conversation, but my point is: will all this intellectual effort actually result in a significant improvement in the article? My preference in this situation would be to state the facts, citing sources, noting contradictions but not elaborating on them, and leave the reader to draw conclusions. That inclines me towards the format given by Winston786 and Dianna; SH's "seems to have" sounds to me like WP:OR.
Back to my first point: the origins of the family are lost in time; that's normally the case - families don't usually have a clear starting point. An exception would be when an individual rose from obscurity to prominence and founded a dynasty, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. So when Raj Kapoor is quoted as saying "that his family hailed originally from Peshawar" I immediately question the meaning of "originally" - how do you define an origin in an evolutionary continuum? A related question is: what does he mean by "his family"? He could be referring to the family in which he grew up i.e. his parents and grandparents, or to an inherited knowledge of a longer line of ancestors. We don't actually know what he meant and it would be against WP:OR to try to draw conclusions, however well we believe we understand the personal and cultural values he would have attached to the words he used. I am uncomfortable with stating as fact Ishtiaq Ahmed's recollection of what Raj Kapoor said when what he said is so clearly missing context vital to its unambiguous understanding. Raj Kapoor's words are valuable as a description of his identification of his family's roots, but I feel they should be presented clearly in that context; we don't know what other family members would have said on the subject and it would be unwarranted to apply Raj's words -- and the emotions, memories, temporal context and self-identity that underlie them -- to the family as a whole.
I hope that gives some food for thought that may lead to a consensus (if only a consensus that you all disagree with me!). -- Timberframe ( talk) 16:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Winston786, you say that we here on WP are supposed to write facts and work for making sure they are correct. I agree, but only to the extent that wiki has policies on the type of sources we can cite, and the need to be able to verify that what we write accurately reflects what those sources say. Strange as it may seem (and some editors really do struggle with the concept) WP does not set out to be a definitive textbook, and nowhere that I've seen is there a WP policy on making sure that the facts that we write about are correct. Essentially, the facts that WP editors write are that "such a source says this", if we start to go down the road of trying to validate the facts that the sources write about we inevitably end up introducing our own perception of what is "correct" or crossing the line of WP:OR. I think this may be the underlying raison d'etre of this discussion: you all appear to agree what sources exist and what they say; you're disagreeing about how to synthesise their content. -- Timberframe ( talk) 17:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Text "Film" ignored (
help); Text "The Guardian" ignored (
help)
{{
cite book}}
: |edition=
has extra text (
help); Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite book}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Get over with the pending one first. Winston786 ( talk) 13:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Some of the sources Sikh-History used I was unable to get to load on my computer to review them, so sorry.
-- Diannaa ( Talk) 21:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Prithviraj Kapoor, the first of the family to pursue acting, was born in 1906 in the town of Samundri near Lyallpur, in the Punjab province of Pakistan. [1] Prithviraj's grandfather, Dewan Keshavmal Kapoor, worked as a Tehsildar in Samundri [2] and his father, Dewan Basheswarnath Kapoor, was a sub-inspector of police stationed at Peshawar. [3] [4] In 1928 Prithviraj left Peshawar for Mumbai to become an actor. [5] [6] He worked as an extra for the first few days in the silent film Challenge (1929). Later during an audition, he was selected to play the male lead in the film Cinema Girl. [7]
We have conflicting reports as to whether the home town was Samundri or Peshawar, so I would like to leave it out. Sikh-History has some sources that say they are Punjabi but I was unable to get them to load, so I am unable to verify that. So I would like to leave the ethnicity out as well until we are sure what to put. -- Diannaa ( Talk) 22:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
References
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Shammi Kapoor.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
|
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC) |
Some user is adding that Kapoors are "Hindu Pathans", what does that even mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PISCOSOUR786 ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
It means that they practice Hinduism and are of Pathan origin, tracing their roots to the city of Peshawar.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kapoor family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kapoor family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Given that Wikipedia is not a genealogy, I propose inserting the word "Notable" in front of the section heading "Members of the Kapoor family" and removing all entries for members without Wikipedia articles. Largoplazo ( talk) 21:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
There are many lines which are totally inclined to appreciate this family. Seems like such statements and words like "*the only real dynasty in in Indian Industry*, "the patriarch"(for Raj Kapoor), etc. has been included by their affinities. This page urgently needs neutralisation! Gyaansevak ( talk) 15:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
In the case Surinder Kapoor is the paternal cousin of Prithviraj Kapoor, how is he related to Basheshwarnath Kapoor? Jay (Talk) 10:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)