![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Kangna Ranaut at CCL2 match.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kangna Ranaut at CCL2 match.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
wiki GO AND check BHAMBLA is a VILLAGE and she is BORN and brought up in that VILLAGE.. the people of that village are proud of her.... WIKI GO and CHECK her PARENTS and grandparents still lives there.. she has never studied in dehradun WHY YOU ARE PROVIDING WRONG INFORMATION??????????? go AND CHECK SHE HAS studied in HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL... i have met her teachers there... hersister is married NOT TO A DELHI BUSINESSMAN BUTto a HIMACHALI boy. there marriage took place in that village BHAMBLA only.. Her all relatives family members are living in himachal only. SHE has rots in himachal only NOTHING IN JAIPUR.. GO AND CHECK OUT AND THEN WRITE DOWN.. WHY YOU ARE WRITING FALSE CONTENT.... Even she has admitted many times on many shows that she is from VILLAGE and she DOES NOT KNOW ENGLISH.. Then why you people are lying??????????? you have also written wrong AGE PLEASE CHECK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shweata ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
CHANGE HER DATE OF BIRTH FROM 1987 TO 1986 ≤REF≥ HER PASSPORT CHANGE SMALL TOWN BHAMBLA TO ""VILLAGE BHAMBLA"" ≤REF≥ BHAMBLA IS VILLAGE SEE " VILLAGES IN MANDI DISTRICT " AND NO RELATION TO JAIPUR ROYAL FAMILY ≤REF≥ CHECK THEIR" ANCESTORY AND HERS " AND HER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE LIVING IN VILLAGE IN HIMACHAL CHANGESCHOOLING FROM DEHRADUN TO HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL IN VILLAGE BHAMBLA ≤REF≥ HER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE AND HER NAME IN THAT SCHOOL AND SHE HAS NEVER STUDIED IN DEHRADU NO SCHOOL CERTIFICATES ≤OTHER SOURCES ≥ HER INTERVIEW IN WHICH SHE CONFESSED THAT SHE IS FROM VILLAGE AND HAS EVEN LEARNT ENGLISH IN MUMMBAI AND NEVER STUDIED IN CONVENT ≤OTHER SOURCE≥ VARIOUS REGIONAL NEWSPAPERS OF HIMACHAL AND HER ONLY HOME IN VILLAGE BHAMBLA WHERE HER PARENTS AND RELATIVES ARE LIVING ≤OTHER SOURCE≥ MARRIAGE OF HER SISTER WHICH TOOK PLACE IN VILLAGE BHAMBLA HER BROTHER IN LAW IS ALSO HIMACHALI ≤OTHER SOURCE≥ G AND CHECK OUT VILLAGE BHAMBLA IS NEAR ABOUT 40 KM FROM DISTRICT MANDI AND IS A REMOTE VIILAGE AND 150 KM FROM MANALI AND VISIT HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL IN BHAMBLA HER NAME IS REGISTERED THERE AND YOU CAN VISIT HER FAMILY MEMBERS AND RELATIVES WHO ARE LIVING IN NEARBY VILLAGES AND CAN ASK ROYAL FAMILY OF JAIPUR AS THEY HAVE NO RELATION WITH THESE HIMACHALI RAJPUTS YOU CAN CHECK OUT HER ANCESTORY AND VISIT HER VILLAGE Shweata ( talk) 20:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
refrences1)on the couch with koel≤show that come on headlines where kangna herself admitted that she is from small village bhambla in a valley and her parents still live there and anurag did not spot her in a cafe .. 2)the reference you have made"Glamour girls from Himachal Pradesh". The Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-08 has written clearly that she is from a small village bhambla in sarkaghat sub division and 45 km from mandiand also that her family lives inBhambla village 3)^ Ram Kishore Parcha. "Kangana Ranaut interview". BBCHindi.com. Retrieved 2009-04-02.in this article kangna has clearly said that she is from small village bhambla and studied there upto tenth and then for first time went to shimla and then for very first timeout of state to chandigarhand her ancestory ishimachali 4)^ a b "tribuneindia.com". Another actress from Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved 16 February 2007.has clearly stated kangna is from village bhambla and she is born and brought up in bhambla village and her family lives in that village. I HOPE NOW NOW YOU WILL MAKE THE REQUIRED CHANGES AND IN MY EARLIER EDIT REQUESTS I HAVE PROVIDED THE RIGHT AND RELIABLE SOURCES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shweata ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
refrences1)on the couch with koel≤show that come on headlines where kangna herself admitted that she is from small village bhambla in a valley and her parents still live there and anurag did not spot her in a cafe .. 2)the reference you have made"Glamour girls from Himachal Pradesh". The Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-08 has written clearly that she is from a small village bhambla in sarkaghat sub division and 45 km from mandiand also that her family lives inBhambla village 3)^ Ram Kishore Parcha. "Kangana Ranaut interview". BBCHindi.com. Retrieved 2009-04-02.in this article kangna has clearly said that she is from small village bhambla and studied there upto tenth and then for first time went to shimla and then for very first timeout of state to chandigarhand her ancestory ishimachali 4)^ a b "tribuneindia.com". Another actress from Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved 16 February 2007.has clearly stated kangna is from village bhambla and she is born and brought up in bhambla village and her family lives in that village. I HOPE NOW NOW YOU WILL MAKE THE REQUIRED CHANGES AND IN MY EARLIER EDIT REQUESTS I HAVE PROVIDED THE RIGHT AND RELIABLE SOURCES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shweata ( talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
reliable sources for change of small town bhambla to VILLAGE bhambla AND schooling from dehradun to HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL BHAMBLA AND my sources of information and MOST IMPORTANT ALL ARE RELIABLE SOURCES
refrences1)on the couch with koel≤show that come on headlines where kangna herself admitted that she is from small village bhambla in a valley and her parents still live there and anurag did not spot her in a cafe .. 2)the reference you have made"Glamour girls from Himachal Pradesh". The Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-08 has written clearly that she is from a small village bhambla in sarkaghat sub division and 45 km from mandiand also that her family lives inBhambla village 3)^ Ram Kishore Parcha. "Kangana Ranaut interview". BBCHindi.com. Retrieved 2009-04-02.in this article kangna has clearly said that she is from small village bhambla and studied there upto tenth and then for first time went to shimla and then for very first timeout of state to chandigarhand her ancestory ishimachali 4)^ a b "tribuneindia.com". Another actress from Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved 16 FebrUARY has clearly stated that she is born and brought up in village bhambla
117.205.115.215 ( talk) 21:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Statements like Her performance in the film earned her rave reviews need to be supported by reliable and verifiable sources, else this article will become promotional in tone. Need help here - Wikishagnik ( talk) 05:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
date of birth on 20.03.1987 59.160.130.163 ( talk) 13:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request to remove her dob as per sources. The following indicate, she is fabricating her dob. Her passport shows she was born on 1981 not 1987. Remove it until we reach a consensus. --->>> Goandseepaul ( talk) 12:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Kindly do not listen to he speculation over Kangna's age..... She is March 23-1987 she is just 22..... http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_kangna-ranaut-cannot-wait-to-turn-25_1665712
how come her passport says her date of birth is in 1981 and why does she have to fake it ....i mean come on 6 fake years wont going to make her any younger....people should admit their real age no matter how old they are..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingofdandi4 ( talk • contribs) 10:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Hai every one don't believe in the speculations over Kangna's age..... Many sites carry her name with mis information.... Please visit www.realkangnaranaut.com for your doubts about Kangna..... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
117.206.114.235 (
talk)
05:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Kangana has indeed hidden her actual age that is six years more, as reported by ndtv.com, a reliable news site. The news is titled Fool's paradise: When Bollywood stars tried to fool fans [see URL: http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/fool-s-paradise-when-bollywood-stars-tried-to-fool-fans-502933?pfrom=home-movies]. So her age in 2014 is 33 and not 27 as this webpage shows.
Please add BH external link in this {{ Bollywood Hungama}} template, see Info...
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the movie review link of Revolver Rani from a reliable source
Ranaut has several upcoming projects in various stages of development. She has completed work on two films that are scheduled for a 2014 release—the black comedy Revolver Rani [1] with Vir Das, and the Karan Johar-produced drama Ungli alongside Emraan Hashmi, Sanjay Dutt and Randeep Hooda.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 09:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Will review within next three days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Certinaly adequate for GA but if you intend taking it to FA at some point I really think you need to cut back on the quotations, particularly the more sugary ones which aren't that informative, and paraphrase or remove a few to improve flow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
References
Please can I have permission or can someone else change the picture on Kangana's page, the picture isnt that good and has a watermark from a website, it does not look neat, take for example the neat photo of Deepika Padukone on her wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micruise ( talk • contribs) 10:12, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Its true that Kangana Ranaut acted as male in a play.
In June 2003 , Girish Karnad 's classic play Rakt-Kalyan Taledanda was going to stage at India Habitat Centre.She was playing Lalitamba's character in it.Before the show one of the main character fell ill ,but Kangana came out and prepared Damodar Bhatt's role within an hour.Damodar Bhatt's role is very challenging but that day Kangana 's performance in both Male & female characters was outstanding.
pls read cinema critic Ram Kishore Parcha's BBC interview with Kangana Ranaut http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/entertainment/story/2009/03/090309_kangna_interview_ad.shtml ( 59.177.11.151 ( talk) 04:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.177.11.151 ( talk) 04:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
CAN SOME ONE ADD HER CONTROVERSY WITH PARIS HILTON — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.243.182 ( talk) 13:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
can some one put her controversy with Paris hilton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.243.182 ( talk) 11:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
If the edit war continues after protection expires editors will be blocked. -- NeilN talk to me 13:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Katti Batti Film 2015 in filmography Pravinagalave ( talk) 07:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
I think it is important to discuss the matter that is currently ongoing between two actors, that has gained significant media attention, plus actress's alleged accusations to actor for releasing their private emails that results in FIR against Hrithik and subsequent release of prominent evidences of self-made allegations. Nauriya ( Rendezvous) 18:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please fix these three dead links. Thanks, 2A02:8108:30BF:B168:9D25:2267:1056:DAF3 ( talk) 20:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
30? I thought she was 29. FrB.TG ( talk) 16:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Janu Gee is adamant on changing the lead from it's approved FA version to a poorly written and grammatically incorrect version. Attempts at reverts have resulted in gross personal attacks. I hate dealing with such people. Can someone else help me with this? Cheers! -- Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 06:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Since she makes a lot of honest and opinionated views which always land her in troubles, lawsuits, fights with other co stars, dominance in film creative desicions, taking credits, abandoning projects and several other controversies etc. We should have a column titled Controversies on her page just as we do for Salman khan's wikipedia page. These shouldnt be mixed inside Acting career info. DarpSinghh ( talk) 19:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change "born 23 March 1986" in first line to "born 23 March 1984" .. I am her classmate and old friend and know her correct d.o.b. Ria1985 ( talk) 21:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Fg Ravisingh4106 ( talk) 02:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Simran is released now so change the last paragraph of career Pranesh Gavali ( talk) 08:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
About her relationship with Aditya Pancholi - she has spoken about it several times, most notably in Aap Ki Adaalat ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3wHgadR3Y8), where she described how he manipulated and tormented her. She has also spoken about it on Barkha Dutt's show ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncajg8Tki3M) as well as at public forums ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jyfzPaCwdo). Jeerabasmati ( talk) 01:45, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Want to make changes to grammar and formatting and add basic facts like working with Rajkummar Rao for the second time in Anurag Basu's Imli (which has been spelt wrong in the article, by the way). Jeerabasmati ( talk) 01:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
please follow the link. She is not a hindu. She follows many religion https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/a-hrithik-roshan-fan-spreads-hatred-for-kangana-ranaut-through-old-beef-eating-statement-her-team-gives-a-befitting-reply/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.33.162.209 ( talk) 16:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a lie Hrithik Roshan has nothing to do with whatever religion she chooses to practice, nor do his fans say she is a Hindu on the contrary she does not behave like one. The issue is her own statement saying she eats meat, then at a later time claiming she is a vegetarian. The only one that puts the matter in dispute is kangana herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CriticusExpertus ( talk • contribs) 02:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
There are at least 3 birthdates reported for Kangna as her name first appears the year 1981 is the year that fits better with all her history of school and how she started modeling after leaving school, Then her passport list the year 1986 and later she herself claims 1987 PLEASE NOTE that falsification of documents is easy in particular changing a number 1 to a 6 or a 7. Take note and state there is a discrepancy. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 02:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kailash29782 You state her passport shows 1986 yet she goes around saying she was born in 1987. So who is correct you? her passport? her statements? the facts? and she does have a record of lying or misrepresenting reality when it benefits her. Therefore my request to list the date of birth as one of those facts that is a discrepancy in her bio. Just like she is registered twice on voter records as kangna and kangana. Why is it important? Why should anyone care if she is 5 years older or even 1 year older, than she claims? Simple: She has claimed that she was abused/raped by a man while she was a minor. It is a widely known fact that she was having a relationship with the man, a very public and confirmed relationship. Going on the premise that a minor cannot consent to a sexual relationship, it would make it statutory rape at the very least, however if she is in fact 5 years older or even 1 year older, that changes her rape claim to a mutually consensual relationship of adults. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 20:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
In the main content it should be noted that she has changed the potryal of actress in the industry by starring in leading films with no big male stars and making the film's successful Pranesh Gavali ( talk) 10:47, 25 July 2019 (UTC) Kangana has neither been the first to star in a female centric or female lead only film not in India and for sure not worldwide, nor has she set a precedent for such, many other females have done films as sole leads and she is simply a follower, just because she uses it as point to credit herself does not make it fact, most notably in the last two decades Rani Mukerji, Shridevi, Vidya Balan, Shabana Azmi Priyanka Chopra among others have done female centric films. kangana has in fact benefited by path braking females both in acting opportunity and in films made and led by females. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 23:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the sentence that states Manikarnika did farely well at the box office, the truth is that it was a loss, underperforming both within India and at the global market. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 02:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I would ask you the same, PROVIDE support information that shows or proves in a definitive manner that the film was profitable, there is a discrepancy on the budget, with kangana herself stating that the original budget was 120 crores, then she states after the directing fiasco with the original director that she had to re-shoot 75% of the film, a re-shoot means more funds, because I am sure it was not shot for free, the footfalls and the collection tracking sites listed the worldwide collections at under 100 crores, not counting the digital/music recovery, the math is very clear, the exhibitor venues did NOT make profit. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 23:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Multiple reputed news outlets have published a photo of her passport and mentioned her DOB as 23 March 1986. I cannot understand why Wikipedia editors refuse to correct this. In light of recent scandals involving Wiki editors, I am prepared to believe the worst.
https://daily.bhaskar.com/news/ENT-BOW-kangana-ranauts-age-revealed-5331246-PHO.html
https://www.indiatvnews.com/entertainment/bollywood-kangana-ranaut-highly-paid-actress-rangoon-11-crore-truth-330999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outlook2020 ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
These include branding KR's views as controversial without citations. Krimuk2.0 states that there are plenty of citations in the main text. But none of these controversies are listed so on the pages of other celebrities who have similar views. Vizziee ( talk) 14:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)vizziee
I have to agree with DarpSinghh that this article is a little void of her politics and the response she's getting to tweets, like having her home office demolished. I don't think it needs to be a controversy section, necessarily, but there definitely needs to be a section on calling out the Mumbai police and the response to that.-- Literaturegirl ( talk) 19:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
In this edit I removed embedded footnotes that seem entirely unrelated to the content that precedes them. We have a statement about her decision to not go to medical school followed by an irrelevant footnote about how she had to take bad jobs to afford health care for her sister. Then there's a statement about the subject being known for her viewpoints, with a footnote about family portraits being shared on social media. Am I missing something? How are these footnotes relevant? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello , I want to request that kangana page requires more protection as page is continously vandlaised or unneccsary details added which arent relevant here if possible add extended protection so that only extended confirm user can edit the page. Aristocratic 536 ( talk) 04:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I have not been one of this page's contributors, nor do I have time or interest to be one at this point, but I've seen her name splash across news headlines off late, including her political affiliation, her involvement and views about the film industry (which she labels "Bollywood mafia"), reactions to her views by media and colleagues. I didn't get into any of it and honestly it does not really interest me, though I did notice a recent column on Indian Express, very critical of Ranaut, which is clearly one-sided, but taken with other pieces could help update her recent activity. Not sure there's any need for it to begin with, but just saying, in case those responsible for this article are interested. Shahid • Talk2me 22:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
I agree. The content on this page is clearly one-sided. Kangana is easily one of the most controversial figures in Bollywood but the page doesn't reflect that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitsurugi78 ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I agree that we should make some mention of it as she has been in the news a lot lately like in the court case I mentioned in the section below.@ Shshshsh: Mitsurugi78 ( talk) 02:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I had added a section regarding a court ordered investigation against Kangana. [1]
Why can't this section be included? Mitsurugi78 ( talk) 02:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
As per BLP "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it."
There are multiple sources for the the court order: [2] [3] [4] Mitsurugi78 ( talk) 02:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
The article requires clean up, especially the Career section. It seems to have been written with a PR point of view. It contains to many unnecessary details and reviews of her performances in films which can be moved to the film’s respective articles. I will like to do the editing. I need the suggestions of the active editors of this article on what should stay and what can be removed, so as to avoid any edit wars. Your suggestions are welcomed here. defcon5 ( talk) 05:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Okay, this new addition:
I find it the most casual piece of info about Kangana - many such things have been ciculated off late, and there's nothing about them which justifies mention on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, it is a biographical article, and this addition is classic case of WP:UNDUE. Shahid • Talk2me 22:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Information saying Ranaut is a sex symbol and fashion icon was removed, and I've restored it. To be more precise - I've changed the sentence from "considered as" to "Ranaut has been cited as a sex symbol and style icon in India". Added a source from a scholarly article and another from Filmfare magazine. The first source, as opposed to what the removing editor mentioned in their edit summary, opens just fine to the original text of the article, which supports the claim. Any which way, the information is an absolutely acceptable review of her public image, and I can't see how it's "outrageous", and certainly do not accept the assertion of the removing editor, who said that "no refs can satisfy" its inclusion. Sorry, they can - that's what verifiability is all about. Moreover, this part was there during its FAC - the article was promoted with this line in it, so its removal will have to be discussed at the very least. I don't know much about this actress, but I'm willing to keep its standard though I think it needs a thorough update. Shahid • Talk2me 23:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As per Kangana's Passport her date of birth is 23rd March 1986. Please fix her age.
Source : image.scoopwhoop.com/w620/s4.scoopwhoop.com/anj2/5e620f2f2f1b745e07becab1/4af2f6c5-fddd-4fba-83ad-4bb455f07665.jpg.webp Samratbhattacharjee ( talk) 11:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
I initially wrote this section under the controversies heading in the article.
"In November 2020, Ranaut faced backlash over comments she made about an elderly woman who was photographed while protesting during the 2020 Indian farmers' protests. Ranaut tweeted an accusation that the woman was actually Bilkis Bano, an 82-year-old woman who was featured in Time 100 2020 for protesting during the Shaheen Bagh protests. She further alleged that Bilkis was a paid protestor, who was "available [for] 100 rupees." This was later proven false, when multiple news stations fact-checked Ranaut's statements and spoke to Bilkis herself, who revealed that while she supports the farmers, she was not at the protests when the photograph was taken. Ranaut later deleted the tweet, but criticized those who fact-checked her."
This is absolutely not casual information. Her comments have now been covered by reputable news stations, such as NDTV, and have been in the news cycle for multiple days. I will be adding this section back to the article, and backing it with multiple sources in addition to the ones previously cited.
CalicoMo ( talk) 04:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
not everything that gets wide coverage deserves mention here, that's why rest of them are not there. She is into so many controversies doesn't mean that this should be considered as just another. This particular incident went farther than the rest with wider coverage and many celebrities getting involved. This is also directly connected to a notable event 2020 Indian farmers' protest.
Known to be outspoken in the press, the opinions she has voiced, along with frequent reports of her personal and professional relationships, have frequently sparked controversy., which I think is a good summary. We can expand with to 3-4 lines in the public image section and use references such as [5] which provide a summary, instead of focusing on individual incidents. Pinging User:Shshshsh and User:Cyphoidbomb.-- DreamLinker ( talk) 12:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
The mention of her Twitter ban is in my opinion essential information in the body text but definitely not significant enough to merit a mention in the lead. First, let's not make Twitter more than it is - it is a social platform. People here seem to forget, but this is an encylopedia, an encyclopedic entry where the lead is a general summary of her life and career. She is not a public person, and this is not a major even in her life. Above all, this article is an FA, such additions must meet consensus and cannot be re-added without discussion. Don't make this article into a film magazine. Shahid • Talk2me 08:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please include in the section "See also" /info/en/?search=Kangana_Ranaut_filmography 2405:201:D007:5C:556E:C1D8:6250:AD6 ( talk) 09:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Known for versatility in cinema and portrayal of strong women in female centric films
That seems to be an
extraordinary claim. Please add multiple high quality sources (in the body describing as such) or remove the claim. Also she has been described in the media as one of India's highest-paid actresses
- a quick scan thru the article has some content that supports the statement, but a review might be necessary. — DaxServer (
talk to
me)
07:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
At Filmare, was won just for Gangster, not Woh Lamhe. This is a mistake in the TOI source. The award ceremony video is available online. Shahid • Talk2me 09:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Please discuss what to do with the lead here, Nenetarun. — Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 13:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
i want to add the padma shri award photo of kangana ranaut please Ritgvs ( talk) 08:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
I'd say I don't completely disagree with Seabirdie's changes in terms of ordering of the media section, but as Krimuk2.0 said, consensus is all that matters here. I see that Seabirdie is not happy with the following:
Shahid • Talk2me 12:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good but a little banal. What do we mean by it? I haven't seen a lot of Kangana's movies, but do we mean she is the single lead right? Because basically every film (or most of them) has a female lead, and we're talking about women-centered films where the leading lady is the main protagonist, something like a star vehicle, isn't it? Shahid • Talk2me 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This lead is so overhyped? her films aren't unconventional and we've see female actors doing Dhaakad (action), Thalaivii (political drama), Panga (sports drama), Judgemental Hai Kya (Psychological drama), Manikarnika (period drama) kinda films several times in past.. There are more but these are her 5 last films. Known for her work in female lead films was a much suitable lead. Also almost all her films are very much commercial and promoted on a big scale, ain't no way these are unconventional or something new. See the work of actresses like Smita Patil or Shabana Azmi or Tabu/Konkona Sen Sharma from recent era, These ladies craved parallel cinema with actual unconventional films and work. @ User:Shshshsh Vellaonwiki ( talk) 18:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh huh? If that's the case then literally every character in a female lead film is "unconventional" and there are multiple sources and critics who even noted Alia Bhatt and Deepika Padukone for example for portraying unconventional characters, just Google them with "unconventional roles" and see how many sources pops up. I've seen the main article and i can't find any major reliable source for "strong-willed" and "unconventional" characters and also I've watched almost all her films. She has only one unconventional character which she portrayed in film Queen. Unconventional basically means different and new and there's nothing new about portraying an spy (Dhaakad), politician (Thalaivii), sports person (Panga), schizophrenic (Judgemental Hai Kya), warrior queen (Manikarnika) and before that she did romantic drama like Rangoon, comedy films like Tanu Weds Manu Returns and Simran. Now you tell me how these are unconventional? and strong-willed too coz literally every female character rn is strong-willed barely anyone plays subservient characters lol. I would love if you show me multiple reliable and notable publications and critics backing up your statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellaonwiki ( talk • contribs) 03:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh then show me the sources. Tell me the name of publications and critics (4 or 5 atleast) calling her roles unconventional and strong-willed and if wikipedia works on "sources" then lets do this for other actresses as well because i can show you multiple sources as well for them. This lead is overhyped and its a wikipedia page not hagiography. Also, this has nothing to do with National Film Award lol and if it is lets do this with all multiple National Film Awards winners. But first i need to see the sources, list the name of publications and critics, I'll check myself Vellaonwiki ( talk) 12:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh It is indeed overhyped because there are numerous critics who said the same thing about numerous actors so does that mean we'll write a lead like this for everyone? and among the critics or reviews you mentioned, only Namrata Joshi's article seems kinda notable because she's a notable critic but again Rediff ain't an notable publication. Talking about Anupama Chopra one, i clearly remember its just one of the sentences in her Rangoon review and finest doesn't mean unconventional or strong willed and its already mentioned in Public Image section. Times of India and India Today has multiple articles about women breaking stereotypes featuring multiple women, lets add same claims in their wikipedia pages to be fair and talking about "sutaible lead" i've said this in past as well when versatility and highest paid and all were removed from her lead that the most sutaible lead will be "known for portraying strong women centric roles" because this is the exact citation or discription on her Padma Shri certificate, here is the source - "Kangana Padma Shri". YouTube. Retrieved 22 January 2023. and you can check it on their website as well. She got the highest civilian honour, Padma Shri for that so i guess she's actually "known" for that. Lets keep it short and valid. using adjectives like "unconventional" and all is just overhyping period. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 14:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh These are your sources? then lets get to the wikipedia page of any other actress, I'll show you the same type of sources you are showing like things from certain reviews and all and lets see if you add such claims for them as well or not lol. And what mentioned in other section should not be mentioned in lead? Anupama Chopra called her "one of the finest", unconventional word she never mentioned and even adding "one of the finest" in lead just because of one sentence in a film review won't be valid.. multiple notable sources are needed for such claims. Also, do you know the difference between National Awards and a Padma Shri "lol"? NFA's are awarded for a specific performance and role and mind you they also have citations on their certificate and none of her NFA winning performances were noted as unconventional by National Awards themselves and Padma Shri is more like an life time achievement award given for entire contribution of an artist, if they are clearly mentioning what she's "KNOWN" for then how's that not a more valid and more notable source than your sources which are random select sentences from film reviews and generic articles which many other actresses have them about them as well. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 15:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh these are your sources? The Quint which is not even a publication at first place, it is an general news and "opinion" website.. Using opinion websites as source for such big claims isn't valid at all especially when you only said "wikipedia doesn't work on opinions" and i also checked your Indian Express source that source again is mainly about of Ranaut's look in film named Katti Batti, its literally a promotional article written by their staff and not a notable critic like Shubhra Gupta who is the most prolific critic of The Indian Express. Your sources clearly are baseless.. Like you should start reading your "source" articles instead of picking select statements and sentences from them.. and now after checking the sources which clearly aren't notable i don't need your assurance. i need a full list of actual notable sources talking about her "artistry" because your cliams like strong willed and unconventional are related to her artistry and not her looks in films (The Indian Express source) and opinion websites (The Quint source). My Padma Shri (which btw not everyone gets at some point, get your facts right! and for your convenience lets assume everyone does then also each of their Padma Shri certificate will have different citations, they aren't going to give generic reasons to honour someone for sure) source is clearly much more notable and reliable than your sources from opinion websites and promotional articles lol. Also, talking about wikipedia pages of other actors, we'll meet there as well.. I'll tag you only if someone reverts my edits but for now lets talk about about Ranaut only. Also, i thought we aren't taking opinions seriously in this conversation right? so yeh i don't need humble opinions which are wrong btw, PS is definitely more prestigious than NFA's even in actors case because NFA's are awarded annually to multiple actors, actor can win multiple NFA's as well but PS is something which an actor can win once in his/her lifetime. They can only upgrade it to Padma Bhushan or Padma Vibhushan but again that takes years and most of them aren't honored. I kinda think you don't know how Padma Awards works like imagine saying everyone gets it at one point when there are so many senior actors than Kangana who still aren't awarded and i don't understand what NFA's has to do with doing unconventional or strong willed roles? NFA jury never said that and her NFA citations doesn't have that either. You clearly made an opinion just because she won 4 NFA's and then then you preach about how opinions doesn't work on wikipedia but sources does. If you're claiming she's known for unconventional roles because of her NFA's then show me sources from NFA's and its jury and not your opinions. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 08:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh See how you're now running away from the conversation because i actually showed facts and how your sources are unreliable lol. Calling Quint which is described as an opinion website a reliable source when you only claimed wikipedia doesn't work on opinions just doesn't make any sense and you also couldn't list more sources. Also, talking about forum or place about POV when your claim is literally your POV, i mean you couldn't even list proper sources that says it all, i debunked all your sources from opinion websites and promotional articles and you don't have a comeback! Also, saying her NFA's shows she's appreciated or unconventional is plain dumb and again its your POV, NFA jury never said that and according to your logic we should add claims like "Shabana Azmi is the best actress in India" because she's actress with most NFA's or "Satyajit Ray is the best Indian artist" because he has most NFA's for an individual.. Please make sense, show sources about her actual artistry, like my Padma Shri source clearly mentions what she's known for unlike your sources which are either your POV or unreliable sources and sorry you can't say you had your say because you didn't proved your points and couldn't deny my points either, I'll just use my version then because as per talks you just decided to stop having an point to point conversation and said you had your say. btw if you are so clear then why don't you show me actual sources, sources should talk about her artistry in general. This has nothing to do with article or my points but i would also love if you explain me how Padma Shri ain't a reliable source, when its an honour given by India's government but The Quint which is described as an opinion website is, if Government of India ain't reliable then NFA's can't be used to make such claims either because they are also Government sponsored awards. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 14:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh First of all i am not even rude and just having a proper conversation with points and yes talking about Shabana Azmi you should actually see her wikipedia page for reference and see how well sourced her lead is, the sources are actually talking about her artistry unlike sources for Kangana and you keep saying multiple source when you showed me just three sources and those sources are from opinion websites, promotional articles and select sentences from film reviews and none of these sources are talking about her artistry, if you find a source like Shabana Azmi has in her lead for Ranaut then only you can make such big claims. For now she's known for doing female lead films only and not for being unconventional or anything and if she is again I'm asking show me sources, add them in main body of article because i can't see any source on the main page claiming she's known for doing unconventional roles, we all will see what kinda multiple sources you're talking about. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 15:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh trust me i can read as well and yes Kangana's page is much better sourced, all her points about her political views and public image is well sourced but this lead simply isn't like Shabana Azmi's lead and again show me where one the main page she's noted as someone who's known for doing unconventional roles with multiple sources.. see because I've not spend more than a decade editing wikipedia pages so you have to be a little more helpful and tell me where exactly are the sources on the main page and where exactly those sources claims "known for doing unconventional strong willed roles". I'll read them carefully like i did with your sources you showed me here and will be back with a counter if they're same like your previous sources. and since you're apparently the main contributor of Shabana Azmi's wikipedia page then lets keep her lead source as the benchmark and show me similar sources for Kangana, thank you! Vellaonwiki ( talk) 15:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh I've said these in my previous texts (or whatever you call them) that only Namrata Joshi's article is valid since the article is more about artistry but again based on one critic you can't make such big claims and she only said Ranaut makes unconventional "choices" and that doesn't actually mean she's "known" for that so yehbit is a better source but not perfect enough to make such claims and now talking about BBC article, the critic called her natural and said she created her own niche, that doesn't mean she's unconventional or strong -willed but yeh Ranaut doesn't have an artistry section yet it can feature in that now again coming back to the point, it doesn't justify the lead and btw in the same article there's an comment of a much more notable critic Anna M. M. Vetticad, she says "Ranaut was once known for her craft" so basically she's saying now she just isn't known for her work or craft. And no the Indian express lead ain't notable like its literally a article talking about Kangana's look in Katti Batti and The Quint again a opinion based website and yes opinions of websites may matter but only if someone notable is writing, Stutee Ghosh is the most notable critic at The Quint she didnt wrote that someone from staff did and pretty sure staffs opinions aren't valid and there's a reason why the article is basically a "news outlet" about Kangana's look and not artistry. More and better sources are needed like Namrata Joshi's, atleast 3 or 4 I'll say for such big praise adjectives like unconventional and strong willed. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 18:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
The current citations to support this contentious label aren't enough. The DNA article is more or less a gossip and should be removed. Can we get more high-quality sources [with bylines from reliable journalists/analysts/scholars]? — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 12:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
SS demolished a part of her home-office later she took SS to Bombay HC. The whole saga from why she took upon SS to how it ended at the very end is missing from her personal life(?) section — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 19:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Kangna Ranaut at CCL2 match.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kangna Ranaut at CCL2 match.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
wiki GO AND check BHAMBLA is a VILLAGE and she is BORN and brought up in that VILLAGE.. the people of that village are proud of her.... WIKI GO and CHECK her PARENTS and grandparents still lives there.. she has never studied in dehradun WHY YOU ARE PROVIDING WRONG INFORMATION??????????? go AND CHECK SHE HAS studied in HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL... i have met her teachers there... hersister is married NOT TO A DELHI BUSINESSMAN BUTto a HIMACHALI boy. there marriage took place in that village BHAMBLA only.. Her all relatives family members are living in himachal only. SHE has rots in himachal only NOTHING IN JAIPUR.. GO AND CHECK OUT AND THEN WRITE DOWN.. WHY YOU ARE WRITING FALSE CONTENT.... Even she has admitted many times on many shows that she is from VILLAGE and she DOES NOT KNOW ENGLISH.. Then why you people are lying??????????? you have also written wrong AGE PLEASE CHECK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shweata ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
CHANGE HER DATE OF BIRTH FROM 1987 TO 1986 ≤REF≥ HER PASSPORT CHANGE SMALL TOWN BHAMBLA TO ""VILLAGE BHAMBLA"" ≤REF≥ BHAMBLA IS VILLAGE SEE " VILLAGES IN MANDI DISTRICT " AND NO RELATION TO JAIPUR ROYAL FAMILY ≤REF≥ CHECK THEIR" ANCESTORY AND HERS " AND HER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE LIVING IN VILLAGE IN HIMACHAL CHANGESCHOOLING FROM DEHRADUN TO HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL IN VILLAGE BHAMBLA ≤REF≥ HER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE AND HER NAME IN THAT SCHOOL AND SHE HAS NEVER STUDIED IN DEHRADU NO SCHOOL CERTIFICATES ≤OTHER SOURCES ≥ HER INTERVIEW IN WHICH SHE CONFESSED THAT SHE IS FROM VILLAGE AND HAS EVEN LEARNT ENGLISH IN MUMMBAI AND NEVER STUDIED IN CONVENT ≤OTHER SOURCE≥ VARIOUS REGIONAL NEWSPAPERS OF HIMACHAL AND HER ONLY HOME IN VILLAGE BHAMBLA WHERE HER PARENTS AND RELATIVES ARE LIVING ≤OTHER SOURCE≥ MARRIAGE OF HER SISTER WHICH TOOK PLACE IN VILLAGE BHAMBLA HER BROTHER IN LAW IS ALSO HIMACHALI ≤OTHER SOURCE≥ G AND CHECK OUT VILLAGE BHAMBLA IS NEAR ABOUT 40 KM FROM DISTRICT MANDI AND IS A REMOTE VIILAGE AND 150 KM FROM MANALI AND VISIT HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL IN BHAMBLA HER NAME IS REGISTERED THERE AND YOU CAN VISIT HER FAMILY MEMBERS AND RELATIVES WHO ARE LIVING IN NEARBY VILLAGES AND CAN ASK ROYAL FAMILY OF JAIPUR AS THEY HAVE NO RELATION WITH THESE HIMACHALI RAJPUTS YOU CAN CHECK OUT HER ANCESTORY AND VISIT HER VILLAGE Shweata ( talk) 20:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
refrences1)on the couch with koel≤show that come on headlines where kangna herself admitted that she is from small village bhambla in a valley and her parents still live there and anurag did not spot her in a cafe .. 2)the reference you have made"Glamour girls from Himachal Pradesh". The Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-08 has written clearly that she is from a small village bhambla in sarkaghat sub division and 45 km from mandiand also that her family lives inBhambla village 3)^ Ram Kishore Parcha. "Kangana Ranaut interview". BBCHindi.com. Retrieved 2009-04-02.in this article kangna has clearly said that she is from small village bhambla and studied there upto tenth and then for first time went to shimla and then for very first timeout of state to chandigarhand her ancestory ishimachali 4)^ a b "tribuneindia.com". Another actress from Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved 16 February 2007.has clearly stated kangna is from village bhambla and she is born and brought up in bhambla village and her family lives in that village. I HOPE NOW NOW YOU WILL MAKE THE REQUIRED CHANGES AND IN MY EARLIER EDIT REQUESTS I HAVE PROVIDED THE RIGHT AND RELIABLE SOURCES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shweata ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
refrences1)on the couch with koel≤show that come on headlines where kangna herself admitted that she is from small village bhambla in a valley and her parents still live there and anurag did not spot her in a cafe .. 2)the reference you have made"Glamour girls from Himachal Pradesh". The Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-08 has written clearly that she is from a small village bhambla in sarkaghat sub division and 45 km from mandiand also that her family lives inBhambla village 3)^ Ram Kishore Parcha. "Kangana Ranaut interview". BBCHindi.com. Retrieved 2009-04-02.in this article kangna has clearly said that she is from small village bhambla and studied there upto tenth and then for first time went to shimla and then for very first timeout of state to chandigarhand her ancestory ishimachali 4)^ a b "tribuneindia.com". Another actress from Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved 16 February 2007.has clearly stated kangna is from village bhambla and she is born and brought up in bhambla village and her family lives in that village. I HOPE NOW NOW YOU WILL MAKE THE REQUIRED CHANGES AND IN MY EARLIER EDIT REQUESTS I HAVE PROVIDED THE RIGHT AND RELIABLE SOURCES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shweata ( talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
reliable sources for change of small town bhambla to VILLAGE bhambla AND schooling from dehradun to HILL VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL BHAMBLA AND my sources of information and MOST IMPORTANT ALL ARE RELIABLE SOURCES
refrences1)on the couch with koel≤show that come on headlines where kangna herself admitted that she is from small village bhambla in a valley and her parents still live there and anurag did not spot her in a cafe .. 2)the reference you have made"Glamour girls from Himachal Pradesh". The Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-08 has written clearly that she is from a small village bhambla in sarkaghat sub division and 45 km from mandiand also that her family lives inBhambla village 3)^ Ram Kishore Parcha. "Kangana Ranaut interview". BBCHindi.com. Retrieved 2009-04-02.in this article kangna has clearly said that she is from small village bhambla and studied there upto tenth and then for first time went to shimla and then for very first timeout of state to chandigarhand her ancestory ishimachali 4)^ a b "tribuneindia.com". Another actress from Himachal Pradesh. Retrieved 16 FebrUARY has clearly stated that she is born and brought up in village bhambla
117.205.115.215 ( talk) 21:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Statements like Her performance in the film earned her rave reviews need to be supported by reliable and verifiable sources, else this article will become promotional in tone. Need help here - Wikishagnik ( talk) 05:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
date of birth on 20.03.1987 59.160.130.163 ( talk) 13:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request to remove her dob as per sources. The following indicate, she is fabricating her dob. Her passport shows she was born on 1981 not 1987. Remove it until we reach a consensus. --->>> Goandseepaul ( talk) 12:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Kindly do not listen to he speculation over Kangna's age..... She is March 23-1987 she is just 22..... http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_kangna-ranaut-cannot-wait-to-turn-25_1665712
how come her passport says her date of birth is in 1981 and why does she have to fake it ....i mean come on 6 fake years wont going to make her any younger....people should admit their real age no matter how old they are..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingofdandi4 ( talk • contribs) 10:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Hai every one don't believe in the speculations over Kangna's age..... Many sites carry her name with mis information.... Please visit www.realkangnaranaut.com for your doubts about Kangna..... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
117.206.114.235 (
talk)
05:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Kangana has indeed hidden her actual age that is six years more, as reported by ndtv.com, a reliable news site. The news is titled Fool's paradise: When Bollywood stars tried to fool fans [see URL: http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/fool-s-paradise-when-bollywood-stars-tried-to-fool-fans-502933?pfrom=home-movies]. So her age in 2014 is 33 and not 27 as this webpage shows.
Please add BH external link in this {{ Bollywood Hungama}} template, see Info...
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the movie review link of Revolver Rani from a reliable source
Ranaut has several upcoming projects in various stages of development. She has completed work on two films that are scheduled for a 2014 release—the black comedy Revolver Rani [1] with Vir Das, and the Karan Johar-produced drama Ungli alongside Emraan Hashmi, Sanjay Dutt and Randeep Hooda.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld ( talk · contribs) 09:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Will review within next three days.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Certinaly adequate for GA but if you intend taking it to FA at some point I really think you need to cut back on the quotations, particularly the more sugary ones which aren't that informative, and paraphrase or remove a few to improve flow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:43, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
References
Please can I have permission or can someone else change the picture on Kangana's page, the picture isnt that good and has a watermark from a website, it does not look neat, take for example the neat photo of Deepika Padukone on her wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micruise ( talk • contribs) 10:12, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Its true that Kangana Ranaut acted as male in a play.
In June 2003 , Girish Karnad 's classic play Rakt-Kalyan Taledanda was going to stage at India Habitat Centre.She was playing Lalitamba's character in it.Before the show one of the main character fell ill ,but Kangana came out and prepared Damodar Bhatt's role within an hour.Damodar Bhatt's role is very challenging but that day Kangana 's performance in both Male & female characters was outstanding.
pls read cinema critic Ram Kishore Parcha's BBC interview with Kangana Ranaut http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/entertainment/story/2009/03/090309_kangna_interview_ad.shtml ( 59.177.11.151 ( talk) 04:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.177.11.151 ( talk) 04:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
CAN SOME ONE ADD HER CONTROVERSY WITH PARIS HILTON — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.243.182 ( talk) 13:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
can some one put her controversy with Paris hilton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.243.182 ( talk) 11:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
If the edit war continues after protection expires editors will be blocked. -- NeilN talk to me 13:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Katti Batti Film 2015 in filmography Pravinagalave ( talk) 07:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
I think it is important to discuss the matter that is currently ongoing between two actors, that has gained significant media attention, plus actress's alleged accusations to actor for releasing their private emails that results in FIR against Hrithik and subsequent release of prominent evidences of self-made allegations. Nauriya ( Rendezvous) 18:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please fix these three dead links. Thanks, 2A02:8108:30BF:B168:9D25:2267:1056:DAF3 ( talk) 20:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
30? I thought she was 29. FrB.TG ( talk) 16:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Janu Gee is adamant on changing the lead from it's approved FA version to a poorly written and grammatically incorrect version. Attempts at reverts have resulted in gross personal attacks. I hate dealing with such people. Can someone else help me with this? Cheers! -- Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 06:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Since she makes a lot of honest and opinionated views which always land her in troubles, lawsuits, fights with other co stars, dominance in film creative desicions, taking credits, abandoning projects and several other controversies etc. We should have a column titled Controversies on her page just as we do for Salman khan's wikipedia page. These shouldnt be mixed inside Acting career info. DarpSinghh ( talk) 19:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change "born 23 March 1986" in first line to "born 23 March 1984" .. I am her classmate and old friend and know her correct d.o.b. Ria1985 ( talk) 21:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Fg Ravisingh4106 ( talk) 02:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Simran is released now so change the last paragraph of career Pranesh Gavali ( talk) 08:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
About her relationship with Aditya Pancholi - she has spoken about it several times, most notably in Aap Ki Adaalat ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3wHgadR3Y8), where she described how he manipulated and tormented her. She has also spoken about it on Barkha Dutt's show ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncajg8Tki3M) as well as at public forums ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jyfzPaCwdo). Jeerabasmati ( talk) 01:45, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Want to make changes to grammar and formatting and add basic facts like working with Rajkummar Rao for the second time in Anurag Basu's Imli (which has been spelt wrong in the article, by the way). Jeerabasmati ( talk) 01:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
please follow the link. She is not a hindu. She follows many religion https://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-news/a-hrithik-roshan-fan-spreads-hatred-for-kangana-ranaut-through-old-beef-eating-statement-her-team-gives-a-befitting-reply/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.33.162.209 ( talk) 16:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a lie Hrithik Roshan has nothing to do with whatever religion she chooses to practice, nor do his fans say she is a Hindu on the contrary she does not behave like one. The issue is her own statement saying she eats meat, then at a later time claiming she is a vegetarian. The only one that puts the matter in dispute is kangana herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CriticusExpertus ( talk • contribs) 02:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
There are at least 3 birthdates reported for Kangna as her name first appears the year 1981 is the year that fits better with all her history of school and how she started modeling after leaving school, Then her passport list the year 1986 and later she herself claims 1987 PLEASE NOTE that falsification of documents is easy in particular changing a number 1 to a 6 or a 7. Take note and state there is a discrepancy. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 02:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kailash29782 You state her passport shows 1986 yet she goes around saying she was born in 1987. So who is correct you? her passport? her statements? the facts? and she does have a record of lying or misrepresenting reality when it benefits her. Therefore my request to list the date of birth as one of those facts that is a discrepancy in her bio. Just like she is registered twice on voter records as kangna and kangana. Why is it important? Why should anyone care if she is 5 years older or even 1 year older, than she claims? Simple: She has claimed that she was abused/raped by a man while she was a minor. It is a widely known fact that she was having a relationship with the man, a very public and confirmed relationship. Going on the premise that a minor cannot consent to a sexual relationship, it would make it statutory rape at the very least, however if she is in fact 5 years older or even 1 year older, that changes her rape claim to a mutually consensual relationship of adults. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 20:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
In the main content it should be noted that she has changed the potryal of actress in the industry by starring in leading films with no big male stars and making the film's successful Pranesh Gavali ( talk) 10:47, 25 July 2019 (UTC) Kangana has neither been the first to star in a female centric or female lead only film not in India and for sure not worldwide, nor has she set a precedent for such, many other females have done films as sole leads and she is simply a follower, just because she uses it as point to credit herself does not make it fact, most notably in the last two decades Rani Mukerji, Shridevi, Vidya Balan, Shabana Azmi Priyanka Chopra among others have done female centric films. kangana has in fact benefited by path braking females both in acting opportunity and in films made and led by females. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 23:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the sentence that states Manikarnika did farely well at the box office, the truth is that it was a loss, underperforming both within India and at the global market. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 02:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I would ask you the same, PROVIDE support information that shows or proves in a definitive manner that the film was profitable, there is a discrepancy on the budget, with kangana herself stating that the original budget was 120 crores, then she states after the directing fiasco with the original director that she had to re-shoot 75% of the film, a re-shoot means more funds, because I am sure it was not shot for free, the footfalls and the collection tracking sites listed the worldwide collections at under 100 crores, not counting the digital/music recovery, the math is very clear, the exhibitor venues did NOT make profit. CriticusExpertus ( talk) 23:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Multiple reputed news outlets have published a photo of her passport and mentioned her DOB as 23 March 1986. I cannot understand why Wikipedia editors refuse to correct this. In light of recent scandals involving Wiki editors, I am prepared to believe the worst.
https://daily.bhaskar.com/news/ENT-BOW-kangana-ranauts-age-revealed-5331246-PHO.html
https://www.indiatvnews.com/entertainment/bollywood-kangana-ranaut-highly-paid-actress-rangoon-11-crore-truth-330999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outlook2020 ( talk • contribs) 05:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
These include branding KR's views as controversial without citations. Krimuk2.0 states that there are plenty of citations in the main text. But none of these controversies are listed so on the pages of other celebrities who have similar views. Vizziee ( talk) 14:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)vizziee
I have to agree with DarpSinghh that this article is a little void of her politics and the response she's getting to tweets, like having her home office demolished. I don't think it needs to be a controversy section, necessarily, but there definitely needs to be a section on calling out the Mumbai police and the response to that.-- Literaturegirl ( talk) 19:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
In this edit I removed embedded footnotes that seem entirely unrelated to the content that precedes them. We have a statement about her decision to not go to medical school followed by an irrelevant footnote about how she had to take bad jobs to afford health care for her sister. Then there's a statement about the subject being known for her viewpoints, with a footnote about family portraits being shared on social media. Am I missing something? How are these footnotes relevant? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello , I want to request that kangana page requires more protection as page is continously vandlaised or unneccsary details added which arent relevant here if possible add extended protection so that only extended confirm user can edit the page. Aristocratic 536 ( talk) 04:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
I have not been one of this page's contributors, nor do I have time or interest to be one at this point, but I've seen her name splash across news headlines off late, including her political affiliation, her involvement and views about the film industry (which she labels "Bollywood mafia"), reactions to her views by media and colleagues. I didn't get into any of it and honestly it does not really interest me, though I did notice a recent column on Indian Express, very critical of Ranaut, which is clearly one-sided, but taken with other pieces could help update her recent activity. Not sure there's any need for it to begin with, but just saying, in case those responsible for this article are interested. Shahid • Talk2me 22:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
I agree. The content on this page is clearly one-sided. Kangana is easily one of the most controversial figures in Bollywood but the page doesn't reflect that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitsurugi78 ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I agree that we should make some mention of it as she has been in the news a lot lately like in the court case I mentioned in the section below.@ Shshshsh: Mitsurugi78 ( talk) 02:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
I had added a section regarding a court ordered investigation against Kangana. [1]
Why can't this section be included? Mitsurugi78 ( talk) 02:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
As per BLP "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it."
There are multiple sources for the the court order: [2] [3] [4] Mitsurugi78 ( talk) 02:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
The article requires clean up, especially the Career section. It seems to have been written with a PR point of view. It contains to many unnecessary details and reviews of her performances in films which can be moved to the film’s respective articles. I will like to do the editing. I need the suggestions of the active editors of this article on what should stay and what can be removed, so as to avoid any edit wars. Your suggestions are welcomed here. defcon5 ( talk) 05:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Okay, this new addition:
I find it the most casual piece of info about Kangana - many such things have been ciculated off late, and there's nothing about them which justifies mention on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, it is a biographical article, and this addition is classic case of WP:UNDUE. Shahid • Talk2me 22:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Information saying Ranaut is a sex symbol and fashion icon was removed, and I've restored it. To be more precise - I've changed the sentence from "considered as" to "Ranaut has been cited as a sex symbol and style icon in India". Added a source from a scholarly article and another from Filmfare magazine. The first source, as opposed to what the removing editor mentioned in their edit summary, opens just fine to the original text of the article, which supports the claim. Any which way, the information is an absolutely acceptable review of her public image, and I can't see how it's "outrageous", and certainly do not accept the assertion of the removing editor, who said that "no refs can satisfy" its inclusion. Sorry, they can - that's what verifiability is all about. Moreover, this part was there during its FAC - the article was promoted with this line in it, so its removal will have to be discussed at the very least. I don't know much about this actress, but I'm willing to keep its standard though I think it needs a thorough update. Shahid • Talk2me 23:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As per Kangana's Passport her date of birth is 23rd March 1986. Please fix her age.
Source : image.scoopwhoop.com/w620/s4.scoopwhoop.com/anj2/5e620f2f2f1b745e07becab1/4af2f6c5-fddd-4fba-83ad-4bb455f07665.jpg.webp Samratbhattacharjee ( talk) 11:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
I initially wrote this section under the controversies heading in the article.
"In November 2020, Ranaut faced backlash over comments she made about an elderly woman who was photographed while protesting during the 2020 Indian farmers' protests. Ranaut tweeted an accusation that the woman was actually Bilkis Bano, an 82-year-old woman who was featured in Time 100 2020 for protesting during the Shaheen Bagh protests. She further alleged that Bilkis was a paid protestor, who was "available [for] 100 rupees." This was later proven false, when multiple news stations fact-checked Ranaut's statements and spoke to Bilkis herself, who revealed that while she supports the farmers, she was not at the protests when the photograph was taken. Ranaut later deleted the tweet, but criticized those who fact-checked her."
This is absolutely not casual information. Her comments have now been covered by reputable news stations, such as NDTV, and have been in the news cycle for multiple days. I will be adding this section back to the article, and backing it with multiple sources in addition to the ones previously cited.
CalicoMo ( talk) 04:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
not everything that gets wide coverage deserves mention here, that's why rest of them are not there. She is into so many controversies doesn't mean that this should be considered as just another. This particular incident went farther than the rest with wider coverage and many celebrities getting involved. This is also directly connected to a notable event 2020 Indian farmers' protest.
Known to be outspoken in the press, the opinions she has voiced, along with frequent reports of her personal and professional relationships, have frequently sparked controversy., which I think is a good summary. We can expand with to 3-4 lines in the public image section and use references such as [5] which provide a summary, instead of focusing on individual incidents. Pinging User:Shshshsh and User:Cyphoidbomb.-- DreamLinker ( talk) 12:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
The mention of her Twitter ban is in my opinion essential information in the body text but definitely not significant enough to merit a mention in the lead. First, let's not make Twitter more than it is - it is a social platform. People here seem to forget, but this is an encylopedia, an encyclopedic entry where the lead is a general summary of her life and career. She is not a public person, and this is not a major even in her life. Above all, this article is an FA, such additions must meet consensus and cannot be re-added without discussion. Don't make this article into a film magazine. Shahid • Talk2me 08:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please include in the section "See also" /info/en/?search=Kangana_Ranaut_filmography 2405:201:D007:5C:556E:C1D8:6250:AD6 ( talk) 09:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Known for versatility in cinema and portrayal of strong women in female centric films
That seems to be an
extraordinary claim. Please add multiple high quality sources (in the body describing as such) or remove the claim. Also she has been described in the media as one of India's highest-paid actresses
- a quick scan thru the article has some content that supports the statement, but a review might be necessary. — DaxServer (
talk to
me)
07:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
At Filmare, was won just for Gangster, not Woh Lamhe. This is a mistake in the TOI source. The award ceremony video is available online. Shahid • Talk2me 09:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Please discuss what to do with the lead here, Nenetarun. — Nicholas Michael Halim ( talk) 13:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Kangana Ranaut has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
i want to add the padma shri award photo of kangana ranaut please Ritgvs ( talk) 08:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
I'd say I don't completely disagree with Seabirdie's changes in terms of ordering of the media section, but as Krimuk2.0 said, consensus is all that matters here. I see that Seabirdie is not happy with the following:
Shahid • Talk2me 12:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good but a little banal. What do we mean by it? I haven't seen a lot of Kangana's movies, but do we mean she is the single lead right? Because basically every film (or most of them) has a female lead, and we're talking about women-centered films where the leading lady is the main protagonist, something like a star vehicle, isn't it? Shahid • Talk2me 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
This lead is so overhyped? her films aren't unconventional and we've see female actors doing Dhaakad (action), Thalaivii (political drama), Panga (sports drama), Judgemental Hai Kya (Psychological drama), Manikarnika (period drama) kinda films several times in past.. There are more but these are her 5 last films. Known for her work in female lead films was a much suitable lead. Also almost all her films are very much commercial and promoted on a big scale, ain't no way these are unconventional or something new. See the work of actresses like Smita Patil or Shabana Azmi or Tabu/Konkona Sen Sharma from recent era, These ladies craved parallel cinema with actual unconventional films and work. @ User:Shshshsh Vellaonwiki ( talk) 18:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh huh? If that's the case then literally every character in a female lead film is "unconventional" and there are multiple sources and critics who even noted Alia Bhatt and Deepika Padukone for example for portraying unconventional characters, just Google them with "unconventional roles" and see how many sources pops up. I've seen the main article and i can't find any major reliable source for "strong-willed" and "unconventional" characters and also I've watched almost all her films. She has only one unconventional character which she portrayed in film Queen. Unconventional basically means different and new and there's nothing new about portraying an spy (Dhaakad), politician (Thalaivii), sports person (Panga), schizophrenic (Judgemental Hai Kya), warrior queen (Manikarnika) and before that she did romantic drama like Rangoon, comedy films like Tanu Weds Manu Returns and Simran. Now you tell me how these are unconventional? and strong-willed too coz literally every female character rn is strong-willed barely anyone plays subservient characters lol. I would love if you show me multiple reliable and notable publications and critics backing up your statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellaonwiki ( talk • contribs) 03:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh then show me the sources. Tell me the name of publications and critics (4 or 5 atleast) calling her roles unconventional and strong-willed and if wikipedia works on "sources" then lets do this for other actresses as well because i can show you multiple sources as well for them. This lead is overhyped and its a wikipedia page not hagiography. Also, this has nothing to do with National Film Award lol and if it is lets do this with all multiple National Film Awards winners. But first i need to see the sources, list the name of publications and critics, I'll check myself Vellaonwiki ( talk) 12:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh It is indeed overhyped because there are numerous critics who said the same thing about numerous actors so does that mean we'll write a lead like this for everyone? and among the critics or reviews you mentioned, only Namrata Joshi's article seems kinda notable because she's a notable critic but again Rediff ain't an notable publication. Talking about Anupama Chopra one, i clearly remember its just one of the sentences in her Rangoon review and finest doesn't mean unconventional or strong willed and its already mentioned in Public Image section. Times of India and India Today has multiple articles about women breaking stereotypes featuring multiple women, lets add same claims in their wikipedia pages to be fair and talking about "sutaible lead" i've said this in past as well when versatility and highest paid and all were removed from her lead that the most sutaible lead will be "known for portraying strong women centric roles" because this is the exact citation or discription on her Padma Shri certificate, here is the source - "Kangana Padma Shri". YouTube. Retrieved 22 January 2023. and you can check it on their website as well. She got the highest civilian honour, Padma Shri for that so i guess she's actually "known" for that. Lets keep it short and valid. using adjectives like "unconventional" and all is just overhyping period. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 14:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh These are your sources? then lets get to the wikipedia page of any other actress, I'll show you the same type of sources you are showing like things from certain reviews and all and lets see if you add such claims for them as well or not lol. And what mentioned in other section should not be mentioned in lead? Anupama Chopra called her "one of the finest", unconventional word she never mentioned and even adding "one of the finest" in lead just because of one sentence in a film review won't be valid.. multiple notable sources are needed for such claims. Also, do you know the difference between National Awards and a Padma Shri "lol"? NFA's are awarded for a specific performance and role and mind you they also have citations on their certificate and none of her NFA winning performances were noted as unconventional by National Awards themselves and Padma Shri is more like an life time achievement award given for entire contribution of an artist, if they are clearly mentioning what she's "KNOWN" for then how's that not a more valid and more notable source than your sources which are random select sentences from film reviews and generic articles which many other actresses have them about them as well. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 15:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh these are your sources? The Quint which is not even a publication at first place, it is an general news and "opinion" website.. Using opinion websites as source for such big claims isn't valid at all especially when you only said "wikipedia doesn't work on opinions" and i also checked your Indian Express source that source again is mainly about of Ranaut's look in film named Katti Batti, its literally a promotional article written by their staff and not a notable critic like Shubhra Gupta who is the most prolific critic of The Indian Express. Your sources clearly are baseless.. Like you should start reading your "source" articles instead of picking select statements and sentences from them.. and now after checking the sources which clearly aren't notable i don't need your assurance. i need a full list of actual notable sources talking about her "artistry" because your cliams like strong willed and unconventional are related to her artistry and not her looks in films (The Indian Express source) and opinion websites (The Quint source). My Padma Shri (which btw not everyone gets at some point, get your facts right! and for your convenience lets assume everyone does then also each of their Padma Shri certificate will have different citations, they aren't going to give generic reasons to honour someone for sure) source is clearly much more notable and reliable than your sources from opinion websites and promotional articles lol. Also, talking about wikipedia pages of other actors, we'll meet there as well.. I'll tag you only if someone reverts my edits but for now lets talk about about Ranaut only. Also, i thought we aren't taking opinions seriously in this conversation right? so yeh i don't need humble opinions which are wrong btw, PS is definitely more prestigious than NFA's even in actors case because NFA's are awarded annually to multiple actors, actor can win multiple NFA's as well but PS is something which an actor can win once in his/her lifetime. They can only upgrade it to Padma Bhushan or Padma Vibhushan but again that takes years and most of them aren't honored. I kinda think you don't know how Padma Awards works like imagine saying everyone gets it at one point when there are so many senior actors than Kangana who still aren't awarded and i don't understand what NFA's has to do with doing unconventional or strong willed roles? NFA jury never said that and her NFA citations doesn't have that either. You clearly made an opinion just because she won 4 NFA's and then then you preach about how opinions doesn't work on wikipedia but sources does. If you're claiming she's known for unconventional roles because of her NFA's then show me sources from NFA's and its jury and not your opinions. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 08:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh See how you're now running away from the conversation because i actually showed facts and how your sources are unreliable lol. Calling Quint which is described as an opinion website a reliable source when you only claimed wikipedia doesn't work on opinions just doesn't make any sense and you also couldn't list more sources. Also, talking about forum or place about POV when your claim is literally your POV, i mean you couldn't even list proper sources that says it all, i debunked all your sources from opinion websites and promotional articles and you don't have a comeback! Also, saying her NFA's shows she's appreciated or unconventional is plain dumb and again its your POV, NFA jury never said that and according to your logic we should add claims like "Shabana Azmi is the best actress in India" because she's actress with most NFA's or "Satyajit Ray is the best Indian artist" because he has most NFA's for an individual.. Please make sense, show sources about her actual artistry, like my Padma Shri source clearly mentions what she's known for unlike your sources which are either your POV or unreliable sources and sorry you can't say you had your say because you didn't proved your points and couldn't deny my points either, I'll just use my version then because as per talks you just decided to stop having an point to point conversation and said you had your say. btw if you are so clear then why don't you show me actual sources, sources should talk about her artistry in general. This has nothing to do with article or my points but i would also love if you explain me how Padma Shri ain't a reliable source, when its an honour given by India's government but The Quint which is described as an opinion website is, if Government of India ain't reliable then NFA's can't be used to make such claims either because they are also Government sponsored awards. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 14:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh First of all i am not even rude and just having a proper conversation with points and yes talking about Shabana Azmi you should actually see her wikipedia page for reference and see how well sourced her lead is, the sources are actually talking about her artistry unlike sources for Kangana and you keep saying multiple source when you showed me just three sources and those sources are from opinion websites, promotional articles and select sentences from film reviews and none of these sources are talking about her artistry, if you find a source like Shabana Azmi has in her lead for Ranaut then only you can make such big claims. For now she's known for doing female lead films only and not for being unconventional or anything and if she is again I'm asking show me sources, add them in main body of article because i can't see any source on the main page claiming she's known for doing unconventional roles, we all will see what kinda multiple sources you're talking about. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 15:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh trust me i can read as well and yes Kangana's page is much better sourced, all her points about her political views and public image is well sourced but this lead simply isn't like Shabana Azmi's lead and again show me where one the main page she's noted as someone who's known for doing unconventional roles with multiple sources.. see because I've not spend more than a decade editing wikipedia pages so you have to be a little more helpful and tell me where exactly are the sources on the main page and where exactly those sources claims "known for doing unconventional strong willed roles". I'll read them carefully like i did with your sources you showed me here and will be back with a counter if they're same like your previous sources. and since you're apparently the main contributor of Shabana Azmi's wikipedia page then lets keep her lead source as the benchmark and show me similar sources for Kangana, thank you! Vellaonwiki ( talk) 15:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
@ User:Shshshsh I've said these in my previous texts (or whatever you call them) that only Namrata Joshi's article is valid since the article is more about artistry but again based on one critic you can't make such big claims and she only said Ranaut makes unconventional "choices" and that doesn't actually mean she's "known" for that so yehbit is a better source but not perfect enough to make such claims and now talking about BBC article, the critic called her natural and said she created her own niche, that doesn't mean she's unconventional or strong -willed but yeh Ranaut doesn't have an artistry section yet it can feature in that now again coming back to the point, it doesn't justify the lead and btw in the same article there's an comment of a much more notable critic Anna M. M. Vetticad, she says "Ranaut was once known for her craft" so basically she's saying now she just isn't known for her work or craft. And no the Indian express lead ain't notable like its literally a article talking about Kangana's look in Katti Batti and The Quint again a opinion based website and yes opinions of websites may matter but only if someone notable is writing, Stutee Ghosh is the most notable critic at The Quint she didnt wrote that someone from staff did and pretty sure staffs opinions aren't valid and there's a reason why the article is basically a "news outlet" about Kangana's look and not artistry. More and better sources are needed like Namrata Joshi's, atleast 3 or 4 I'll say for such big praise adjectives like unconventional and strong willed. Vellaonwiki ( talk) 18:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
The current citations to support this contentious label aren't enough. The DNA article is more or less a gossip and should be removed. Can we get more high-quality sources [with bylines from reliable journalists/analysts/scholars]? — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 12:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
SS demolished a part of her home-office later she took SS to Bombay HC. The whole saga from why she took upon SS to how it ended at the very end is missing from her personal life(?) section — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 19:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)