This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article looks like something copied from a magazine, or more likely, a website. There's no source attributed, so it looks like plagiary to me. Mihoshi 17:38, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Mihoshi 03:58, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Should the description of the photograph be moved to the photograph's page, since the details don't add anything to the understanding of the stove beyond what's already displayed in the caption? -- Avocado 23:52, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
P0M: It's always good to add a source for the factual information, as it allows verification and source credibility assessment. — David Remahl 00:11, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
I went a little further than I meant in the beginning rewording the opening paragraph to be more direct. Treat it as a suggestion, and please change any edits back that you choose. Regards. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 12:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The article mentions masonry stoves and ceramic stoves but the word hypocaust only occurs as a bibliographic entry. Surely the hypocaust is a much closer equivalent to the kang and should be discussed in the article? 131.111.85.79 ( talk) 11:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
24.50.151.151 ( talk) 19:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC) As the world decries costs of house heating, hydronic heating is underused. The explanation being no w/w carpeting as blunts heat and the supposed convenience of having the metal (heat loss!) ductwork in place to do double duty for a/c. Instead of carbon credits we should be pursuing floor heating thru hydronic heat tubing.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article looks like something copied from a magazine, or more likely, a website. There's no source attributed, so it looks like plagiary to me. Mihoshi 17:38, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Mihoshi 03:58, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Should the description of the photograph be moved to the photograph's page, since the details don't add anything to the understanding of the stove beyond what's already displayed in the caption? -- Avocado 23:52, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
P0M: It's always good to add a source for the factual information, as it allows verification and source credibility assessment. — David Remahl 00:11, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
I went a little further than I meant in the beginning rewording the opening paragraph to be more direct. Treat it as a suggestion, and please change any edits back that you choose. Regards. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 12:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
The article mentions masonry stoves and ceramic stoves but the word hypocaust only occurs as a bibliographic entry. Surely the hypocaust is a much closer equivalent to the kang and should be discussed in the article? 131.111.85.79 ( talk) 11:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
24.50.151.151 ( talk) 19:25, 25 December 2014 (UTC) As the world decries costs of house heating, hydronic heating is underused. The explanation being no w/w carpeting as blunts heat and the supposed convenience of having the metal (heat loss!) ductwork in place to do double duty for a/c. Instead of carbon credits we should be pursuing floor heating thru hydronic heat tubing.