![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
There are several articles relating to Kanesatake that are drastically in need of attention due to issues of NPOV and general style problems. These include the following:
Discussion at Talk:John sha ko hen the tha Harding describes the problem in some detail. There is a proposal to merge that article or some of its content with Kanesatake, Quebec. I'm proposing to do that and then edit the whole mess. Sunray 01:08, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I've added the {{ POV-check}} template to this article, with respect to the above-mentioned NPOV issues. Not having a great deal of accurate knowledge of the subject, I don't feel comfortable making a judgement one way or the other, but the use of such words as "obsession" and "trampling rights" seem to be definite red flags to me. Thoughts from other editors and contributors are welcomed. -- dragfyre 13:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I apologize in advance for the numerous citation request tags I've placed on the article, but editors should keep in mind that properly referenced material is essential for maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia, without them the information provided is always questionable to the average reader. It goes without saying that libelous statements (especially those regarding living persons) are completely unacceptable in Wikipedia. regards Deconstructhis ( talk) 15:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Added 18th and 19th-century history, with more context for land claims, and religious and political dissension. All new content is cited, and new sources are added. Parkwells ( talk) 16:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kanesatake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The "Oka crisis" section is written with a pro-mohawk POV, and demonizing the SQ and the government of Canada. Nobody is denying that they didn't do anything wrong, but the article should be able demonstrate this without using unsourced claims nor weasel words. 198.103.249.251 ( talk) 20:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Why the eff is "Oka Crisis" nested under this heading? Ugh. 216.208.210.178 ( talk) 14:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
There are several articles relating to Kanesatake that are drastically in need of attention due to issues of NPOV and general style problems. These include the following:
Discussion at Talk:John sha ko hen the tha Harding describes the problem in some detail. There is a proposal to merge that article or some of its content with Kanesatake, Quebec. I'm proposing to do that and then edit the whole mess. Sunray 01:08, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I've added the {{ POV-check}} template to this article, with respect to the above-mentioned NPOV issues. Not having a great deal of accurate knowledge of the subject, I don't feel comfortable making a judgement one way or the other, but the use of such words as "obsession" and "trampling rights" seem to be definite red flags to me. Thoughts from other editors and contributors are welcomed. -- dragfyre 13:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I apologize in advance for the numerous citation request tags I've placed on the article, but editors should keep in mind that properly referenced material is essential for maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia, without them the information provided is always questionable to the average reader. It goes without saying that libelous statements (especially those regarding living persons) are completely unacceptable in Wikipedia. regards Deconstructhis ( talk) 15:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Added 18th and 19th-century history, with more context for land claims, and religious and political dissension. All new content is cited, and new sources are added. Parkwells ( talk) 16:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kanesatake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The "Oka crisis" section is written with a pro-mohawk POV, and demonizing the SQ and the government of Canada. Nobody is denying that they didn't do anything wrong, but the article should be able demonstrate this without using unsourced claims nor weasel words. 198.103.249.251 ( talk) 20:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Why the eff is "Oka Crisis" nested under this heading? Ugh. 216.208.210.178 ( talk) 14:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)