This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kanban is japanesse and means just "board" or white board or "signalisation" (board for traffic). So your titel means board board ! -- Cosy-ch ( talk) 19:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Although "Kanban" might translate to "board", "billboard", or "card" in Japanese, in English people are not necessarily know this. Also the "Kanban Board" is in reference to "Board" being listed in online systems as a tool inside PM software. Those same Boards can usually be used for SCRUM also. I would disagree that "Kanban Board" should be either renamed and also no merged. These are different concepts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8700:93F8:191C:8903:73FC:FE06 ( talk) 17:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
I propose that Kanban_board be merged into Kanban. The content in the Kanban_board article can easily be explained in the context of Kanban, and the Kanban article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Kanban_board will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. -- Lance E Sloan ( talk) 15:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Ok, shall we consider it decided? Let's remove the banner suggesting the merge? 142.166.168.10 ( talk) 12:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
I second the idea to not merge it, a Kanban board section already exists in the Kanban article, but is far smaller and brief, to keep the overall article within reasonable size. However I will link that article to this page, which I think is quite useful to keep separate. OrangeLeanVoice ( talk) 18:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
I second the thought of not merging Kanban and the Kanban board. Kanban is a process that came about from manufacturing and is a general process that can be applied to any process to achieve efficiency. The Kanban board is very limited in its usage only in development. This will eliminate the ideal use of Kanban in places where it would be a good fit other than development — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.37.8.254 ( talk) 15:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Open source tools don't have Wikipedia pages. So, how to include them? -- Sriram vodafone ( talk) 06:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kanban is japanesse and means just "board" or white board or "signalisation" (board for traffic). So your titel means board board ! -- Cosy-ch ( talk) 19:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Although "Kanban" might translate to "board", "billboard", or "card" in Japanese, in English people are not necessarily know this. Also the "Kanban Board" is in reference to "Board" being listed in online systems as a tool inside PM software. Those same Boards can usually be used for SCRUM also. I would disagree that "Kanban Board" should be either renamed and also no merged. These are different concepts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8700:93F8:191C:8903:73FC:FE06 ( talk) 17:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
I propose that Kanban_board be merged into Kanban. The content in the Kanban_board article can easily be explained in the context of Kanban, and the Kanban article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Kanban_board will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. -- Lance E Sloan ( talk) 15:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Ok, shall we consider it decided? Let's remove the banner suggesting the merge? 142.166.168.10 ( talk) 12:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
I second the idea to not merge it, a Kanban board section already exists in the Kanban article, but is far smaller and brief, to keep the overall article within reasonable size. However I will link that article to this page, which I think is quite useful to keep separate. OrangeLeanVoice ( talk) 18:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
I second the thought of not merging Kanban and the Kanban board. Kanban is a process that came about from manufacturing and is a general process that can be applied to any process to achieve efficiency. The Kanban board is very limited in its usage only in development. This will eliminate the ideal use of Kanban in places where it would be a good fit other than development — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.37.8.254 ( talk) 15:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Open source tools don't have Wikipedia pages. So, how to include them? -- Sriram vodafone ( talk) 06:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)