![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The orphaned tag means that there are few or no links to an article (I randomly accessed it.)
For this one, first I wonder why it was written, then why it was tagged :
The candidate links are :
This event is often cited as one, among many, which mobilized the religious/christian right movement in the US. This should be added to the article and also links to this article could be added to pages about the religious right. Bpot 01:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Adding a NPOV tag without any explanation, and even leaving the comment blank, leads one to wonder about the point of view of the person adding the tag. An explanation would be helpful. WVhybrid ( talk) 02:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I too lived in Kanawha County and was a participant in the protest. The Kincheloe comments are the only objective part of this Wiki page. Whoever did the page has a biased POV against the protesters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcpriest ( talk • contribs) 15:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I added a Clarification needed notice to the sentence "An elementary school and a school board building were bombed." It doesn't state whether the schools were fire bombed or bombed from the air.-- Auric ( talk) 19:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Why is there no mentio of the jugement, i.e. "The court has concluded that the committee's rejection of Mississippi: Conflict and Change, while not constituting censorship per se, was certainly an impermissible rejection because the procedure violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights. The court concludes that the rejection of the book for the reasons given evidences a racially discriminatory purpose on the part of the defendants. The court has found that the textbook was not rejected for any justifiable reason. The lack of a justifiable reason is not in and of itself a constitutional violation. However, the court has also found that the racial issues substantially influenced the committee in its decision. That finding, coupled with the finding that the legislative history suggests an intent to perpetuate ideas of segregation and discrimination, leads this court to conclude that the requisite "discriminatory intent" has been demonstrated. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S. Ct. 555, 50 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1977)."? Veverve ( talk) 16:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved Per WP:COMMONNAME. ( non-admin closure) Havelock Jones ( talk) 11:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Kanawha County textbook controversy → ? – 'Controversy' is very much a euphemism when bombs are involved... the Oklahoma incident isn't called a controversy... there were other incidents here as detailed, but surely having 'terrorism' in the title, or maybe 'terroristic controversy' should be adequate (as the categories themselves indicate)... it's violence made for political reasons, and even if it was successful it's still terrorism...
92.0.5.48 (
talk) 06:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting.
Adumbrativus (
talk) 04:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The orphaned tag means that there are few or no links to an article (I randomly accessed it.)
For this one, first I wonder why it was written, then why it was tagged :
The candidate links are :
This event is often cited as one, among many, which mobilized the religious/christian right movement in the US. This should be added to the article and also links to this article could be added to pages about the religious right. Bpot 01:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Adding a NPOV tag without any explanation, and even leaving the comment blank, leads one to wonder about the point of view of the person adding the tag. An explanation would be helpful. WVhybrid ( talk) 02:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I too lived in Kanawha County and was a participant in the protest. The Kincheloe comments are the only objective part of this Wiki page. Whoever did the page has a biased POV against the protesters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcpriest ( talk • contribs) 15:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I added a Clarification needed notice to the sentence "An elementary school and a school board building were bombed." It doesn't state whether the schools were fire bombed or bombed from the air.-- Auric ( talk) 19:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Why is there no mentio of the jugement, i.e. "The court has concluded that the committee's rejection of Mississippi: Conflict and Change, while not constituting censorship per se, was certainly an impermissible rejection because the procedure violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights. The court concludes that the rejection of the book for the reasons given evidences a racially discriminatory purpose on the part of the defendants. The court has found that the textbook was not rejected for any justifiable reason. The lack of a justifiable reason is not in and of itself a constitutional violation. However, the court has also found that the racial issues substantially influenced the committee in its decision. That finding, coupled with the finding that the legislative history suggests an intent to perpetuate ideas of segregation and discrimination, leads this court to conclude that the requisite "discriminatory intent" has been demonstrated. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S. Ct. 555, 50 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1977)."? Veverve ( talk) 16:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved Per WP:COMMONNAME. ( non-admin closure) Havelock Jones ( talk) 11:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Kanawha County textbook controversy → ? – 'Controversy' is very much a euphemism when bombs are involved... the Oklahoma incident isn't called a controversy... there were other incidents here as detailed, but surely having 'terrorism' in the title, or maybe 'terroristic controversy' should be adequate (as the categories themselves indicate)... it's violence made for political reasons, and even if it was successful it's still terrorism...
92.0.5.48 (
talk) 06:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting.
Adumbrativus (
talk) 04:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
References