The contents of the Calamyde page were
merged into
Kalamydi. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see
its talk page. (9 July 2022)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
The result was: merged. P. Aculeius' argument that Calamyde should be the proper title didn't receive any support, so I merged to Kalamydi per the original suggestion. Any move discussion should probably also consider
Kalamyde.
Caeciliusinhorto (
talk) 10:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Original article for Kalamydi was published in January 2007, suggest that this be merged into it.
Kazamzam (
talk) 16:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, this is another poor article created by Carlossuarez.
T8612(talk) 20:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
MergetoCalamyde. As an site from Greek antiquity, it should be found under its ancient Greek name—as traditionally transliterated into the Latin alphabet—rather than a modern transliteration of the modern Greek name. Until yesterday nearly all of the details about this place were found at Calamyde, while this was a much smaller stub. The expansion of the article into a slightly larger stub is fine—but it should go under "Calamyde". The lead can still provide the modern name, and anyone who searches for that will still arrive at the correct article.
P Aculeius (
talk) 10:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The contents of the Calamyde page were
merged into
Kalamydi. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see
its talk page. (9 July 2022)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
The result was: merged. P. Aculeius' argument that Calamyde should be the proper title didn't receive any support, so I merged to Kalamydi per the original suggestion. Any move discussion should probably also consider
Kalamyde.
Caeciliusinhorto (
talk) 10:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Original article for Kalamydi was published in January 2007, suggest that this be merged into it.
Kazamzam (
talk) 16:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Support, this is another poor article created by Carlossuarez.
T8612(talk) 20:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
MergetoCalamyde. As an site from Greek antiquity, it should be found under its ancient Greek name—as traditionally transliterated into the Latin alphabet—rather than a modern transliteration of the modern Greek name. Until yesterday nearly all of the details about this place were found at Calamyde, while this was a much smaller stub. The expansion of the article into a slightly larger stub is fine—but it should go under "Calamyde". The lead can still provide the modern name, and anyone who searches for that will still arrive at the correct article.
P Aculeius (
talk) 10:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.