This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
KSI vs Logan Paul article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
KSI vs Logan Paul was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
Why did somebody nominate this for deletion, saying until the discussion is closed? There is no discussion about this. Also, unblock me on Wikia. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sockleet (
talk •
contribs) 11:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Sockleet, Wikia is not related to Wikipedia; it's beyond the scope of Wikipedia's control, so there's nothing we can do to help you there. The reasons for the (now-closed) deletion discussion may be found at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSI vs Logan Paul. Basically, an editor thought that the subject of this article was
not notable enough for an encyclopedia entry, though others disagreed.
Mz7 (
talk) 20:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Piracy
I think removing "meaning over 12 million dollars was lost in pay-per-view revenue." or changing it to something like "meaning over $12 million in potential pay-per-view revenue was not realized." would be an improvement. This addition isn't mentioned in the cited source and piracy doesn't equate 1:1 with lost revenue as implied here.
Ouroborus777 (
talk) 22:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
KSI vs Logan Paul article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
KSI vs Logan Paul was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
Why did somebody nominate this for deletion, saying until the discussion is closed? There is no discussion about this. Also, unblock me on Wikia. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sockleet (
talk •
contribs) 11:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Sockleet, Wikia is not related to Wikipedia; it's beyond the scope of Wikipedia's control, so there's nothing we can do to help you there. The reasons for the (now-closed) deletion discussion may be found at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSI vs Logan Paul. Basically, an editor thought that the subject of this article was
not notable enough for an encyclopedia entry, though others disagreed.
Mz7 (
talk) 20:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Piracy
I think removing "meaning over 12 million dollars was lost in pay-per-view revenue." or changing it to something like "meaning over $12 million in potential pay-per-view revenue was not realized." would be an improvement. This addition isn't mentioned in the cited source and piracy doesn't equate 1:1 with lost revenue as implied here.
Ouroborus777 (
talk) 22:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)reply