From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

de-facto standard

"software industry de-facto standard for capturing software requirements"? as judged by whom? "software industry de-facto standard for capturing software requirements"?

Reference refers to the commercial implementation of KAOS (objectiver). This is not very objective. Please change this. From a general experience. Goal modelling is not all too common in requirements engineering (in practice that is). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.89.226.18 ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I would agree with this. If it is an "industry standard" it should be widely documented. Therefore references to justify the statement should be readily available.
Ghaag ( talk) 01:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

de-facto standard

"software industry de-facto standard for capturing software requirements"? as judged by whom? "software industry de-facto standard for capturing software requirements"?

Reference refers to the commercial implementation of KAOS (objectiver). This is not very objective. Please change this. From a general experience. Goal modelling is not all too common in requirements engineering (in practice that is). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.89.226.18 ( talk) 11:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I would agree with this. If it is an "industry standard" it should be widely documented. Therefore references to justify the statement should be readily available.
Ghaag ( talk) 01:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook