This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

History This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Military history: Technology / Weaponry This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force ‹ The template below ( WikiProject Russia) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

I'd abbreviated the units in the infobox and was reverted by Sturmvogel 66. I came back and redid what I'd previously done not realising I'd been reverted. Abbreviating units in infoboxes just seems the sensible thing to do even if there is "plenty of room to display them" (which I don't think is the case when it comes to kilometres per hour). As I see it, it's best to abbreviate units in infoboxes not just to save space but to make it easier to read (not so cluttered with letters). Excuse my redoing the edit without comment. JIMp  _{talk· cont} 15:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

In "MiG-25 'Foxbat' Mig-31 'Foxhound': Russia's Defensive Front Line", the Ye-155 is described as having been planned to use the K-9. The Ye-155 is the prototype variant of the MiG-25, not the Ye-152A. I am not aware of any indication that the Ye-152A is the "predecessor" of the MiG-25/Ye-155 in anything but role - they were separate and concurrent design projects. Rsemmes92 ( talk) 18:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC) reply