K-63 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 14, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Willbb234 ( talk · contribs) 18:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Happy to review this article for GA. Expect comments soon. Kind regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 18:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing the comments promptly and I am looking forward to hearing back from you. Kind regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 09:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
In that case, I will pass this article for GA. The article is written well and any issues with the prose were addressed. The article contains reliable sources. Suspected original research has been discussed and I believe the article is fine. The article contains no copyvio, is neutral, and stable. The article lacks images because none could be found. Regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 10:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
K-63 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 14, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Willbb234 ( talk · contribs) 18:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Happy to review this article for GA. Expect comments soon. Kind regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 18:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing the comments promptly and I am looking forward to hearing back from you. Kind regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 09:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
In that case, I will pass this article for GA. The article is written well and any issues with the prose were addressed. The article contains reliable sources. Suspected original research has been discussed and I believe the article is fine. The article contains no copyvio, is neutral, and stable. The article lacks images because none could be found. Regards, Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 10:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|