![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There has been a media rush on this, but it is mainly fueled by social media. There are no reliable sources at the bottom of this. For a healthy dose of scepticism see this article, well worth reading, and the only one I've found that actually spoke to a Mayanist ( David Stuart). Simon Burchell ( talk) 11:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
There appears to be another site .2 kilometers at 150° south of the indicated area. Also, a much larger and far more complex structure can be seen at 2.75 kilometers at 225° southwest. John Huebner ( talk) (Cartographer/Surveyor) 9:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I've moved the elevation diagram down to de-emphasize it a bit; can anybody explain why it is here? The co-ordinates given don't seem to bracket the site, so I'm not clear what it is supposed to tell us. Moonraker12 ( talk) 23:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Espanol | English |
---|---|
Gracias por su paciencia.
Girardelli G.
|
Thank you for your patience.
Girardelli G.
|
However good a journalist Lia Grainger might be, she is not an expert on the subject and the Daily Buzz is clearly not a reliable source. Its website says "ABOUT THE DAILY BUZZ The Daily Buzz is a multimedia digital platform, striving to deliver the best the internet has to offer: from the uplifting to the sidesplitting. Our Meme Masters and Video Virtuosos serve up buzzworthy content and news on a daily basis that’s sure to make even your most hipster friend crack an unironic smile. If we’ve done that, we’ve done our job. So whether you need a laugh or a 3PM pick me up, look no further" [7]
The sources used to claim more discoveries by the University of New Brunswick don't back that claim, and only the National Geographic comes close to meeting WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 10:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
I've spent too much time on this already, someone want to add this? [8] Doug Weller talk 10:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
The final paragraph contradicts itself. It suggests that the lost city both does exist and does not exist. It needs to be edited for grammar and clarity, please. 2001:569:731C:4300:F8E3:6D06:5E45:EB9E ( talk) 02:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There has been a media rush on this, but it is mainly fueled by social media. There are no reliable sources at the bottom of this. For a healthy dose of scepticism see this article, well worth reading, and the only one I've found that actually spoke to a Mayanist ( David Stuart). Simon Burchell ( talk) 11:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
There appears to be another site .2 kilometers at 150° south of the indicated area. Also, a much larger and far more complex structure can be seen at 2.75 kilometers at 225° southwest. John Huebner ( talk) (Cartographer/Surveyor) 9:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
I've moved the elevation diagram down to de-emphasize it a bit; can anybody explain why it is here? The co-ordinates given don't seem to bracket the site, so I'm not clear what it is supposed to tell us. Moonraker12 ( talk) 23:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Espanol | English |
---|---|
Gracias por su paciencia.
Girardelli G.
|
Thank you for your patience.
Girardelli G.
|
However good a journalist Lia Grainger might be, she is not an expert on the subject and the Daily Buzz is clearly not a reliable source. Its website says "ABOUT THE DAILY BUZZ The Daily Buzz is a multimedia digital platform, striving to deliver the best the internet has to offer: from the uplifting to the sidesplitting. Our Meme Masters and Video Virtuosos serve up buzzworthy content and news on a daily basis that’s sure to make even your most hipster friend crack an unironic smile. If we’ve done that, we’ve done our job. So whether you need a laugh or a 3PM pick me up, look no further" [7]
The sources used to claim more discoveries by the University of New Brunswick don't back that claim, and only the National Geographic comes close to meeting WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 10:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
I've spent too much time on this already, someone want to add this? [8] Doug Weller talk 10:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
The final paragraph contradicts itself. It suggests that the lost city both does exist and does not exist. It needs to be edited for grammar and clarity, please. 2001:569:731C:4300:F8E3:6D06:5E45:EB9E ( talk) 02:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)