![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete/redirect, default to keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability tags have repeatedly been added to this article and then removed without discussion. To give some visibility to this issue, I've raised it on the notability noticeboard. Orange Suede Sofa ( talk) 01:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi SimonP. I see you recently deleted the {{ notability}} tag with the edit summary "has enough refs". As you can see above, the question is not the number of refs: it's a question of whether or not those refs which point to reliable sources include significant coverage of Mr. Duerr. I wonder, if you please: Do there exist two refs, which you have viewed, and which include significant coverage? If so, which refs? I have sent you a {{ talkback}} template to point you here. Kind regards, — Unforgettableid ( talk) 19:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Regarding my above comment..... does anyone object to my removing the tags? My reasoning is that, for the "may be an autobiography" tag, this indicates a suspicion on the part of the person who added the tag, I assume since the article had been edited, at various points, by IP users. However, it has also been extensively re-written and re-worded, and many citations have been added, so regardless of the history of the article, I think at this point it could stand without this tag. As for the second tag, there are many citations that can pass
WP:RS. Significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject can be found in the several citations I've added. Among these, which are viewable online:
Add to this the fact that he is partially the topic of a documentary film (constituting another good source that passes WP:RS), I think there is enough here to justify removing the significant-coverage and verifiability tag. There are also many more sources, but these are a few from online archives of print publications, which, while local to Philadelphia, are reputable and have high circulation. The PBS video contains a section devoted to his art, although it begins with a piece about the documentary.
Roomsmoody1924 ( talk) 07:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Justin Duerr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/arts-and-culture/art/146854745.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/music/live_music-38464119.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 October 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete/redirect, default to keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability tags have repeatedly been added to this article and then removed without discussion. To give some visibility to this issue, I've raised it on the notability noticeboard. Orange Suede Sofa ( talk) 01:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi SimonP. I see you recently deleted the {{ notability}} tag with the edit summary "has enough refs". As you can see above, the question is not the number of refs: it's a question of whether or not those refs which point to reliable sources include significant coverage of Mr. Duerr. I wonder, if you please: Do there exist two refs, which you have viewed, and which include significant coverage? If so, which refs? I have sent you a {{ talkback}} template to point you here. Kind regards, — Unforgettableid ( talk) 19:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Regarding my above comment..... does anyone object to my removing the tags? My reasoning is that, for the "may be an autobiography" tag, this indicates a suspicion on the part of the person who added the tag, I assume since the article had been edited, at various points, by IP users. However, it has also been extensively re-written and re-worded, and many citations have been added, so regardless of the history of the article, I think at this point it could stand without this tag. As for the second tag, there are many citations that can pass
WP:RS. Significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject can be found in the several citations I've added. Among these, which are viewable online:
Add to this the fact that he is partially the topic of a documentary film (constituting another good source that passes WP:RS), I think there is enough here to justify removing the significant-coverage and verifiability tag. There are also many more sources, but these are a few from online archives of print publications, which, while local to Philadelphia, are reputable and have high circulation. The PBS video contains a section devoted to his art, although it begins with a piece about the documentary.
Roomsmoody1924 ( talk) 07:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Justin Duerr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/arts-and-culture/art/146854745.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/music/live_music-38464119.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)