The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The ones that say changes domain are fine. The only one that continues to be a problem is the romanialibera.ro domain link. It seems to be redirecting as if the link was not evergreened and is now dead.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)reply
--I don't understand when you mean "link the billboard charts" can you show me an example? Same goes for Radio 1. No cover have charted. I don't believe is such a thing regarding the list of "best selling digital singles of all time"
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
15:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)reply
"Artists and repertoire (A&R) is the division of a record label or music publishing company that is responsible for talent scouting and overseeing the artistic development of recording artists and/or songwriters. It also acts as a liaison between artists and the record label or publishing company; every activity involving artists to the point of album release is generally considered under the purview of, and responsibility of, A&R." - wiki. I have put a disambiguation link to the definition. Ok I will find more two or three that I have seen. I ahve moved the version by Pierce the Veil including the single infobox but I don't think it's important the infobox and it also ruins the article so we could delete it. What's your opinion?
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
02:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)reply
You linked it to the second use. I moved the link to the first use. Even linked it does not provide context. Please re-evaluate and consider how to clear this up. Maybe add a word or two. Is an A&R a type of representative?--03:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I was saying that I didn't no I had to quote the instrumentation and vocal range. I only thought it was the reviews of the song describing it. Everything it's quoted.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
21:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Ok, I get it now. Sorry but I never did something like this before so some terms are new to me and I might missintrepert some vocabulary. Now it's correct, please check it. Thank You
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
00:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I have linked instumentation and vocal range(relevant wikilinks regarding the composition of the song). I was just saying that the majority of FA and GA articles have wikilinks on that section.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
12:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I am putting this On Hold. I will monitor progress and review this after 7 days.
I have improved what you asked until the Track Listening section, could you take a look? Thank You.Also the "Chart precession and succession" section is organized by dates, when the single first reached number one.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I have another show on the live performances. How many are needed? I have added some text to the Track Listening it is that what you are looking for? I have replaced some of the dead links, also.
My point is the text never describes him arranging the media in the shape of him playing the piano. Furthermore the whole description of what he does with the media is unsourced. I.e., now it may be more a problem with the prose in this section.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
08:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
File:Grammy.jpg notes some reservations about the PD status. I need a 2nd opinion on that.
Second opinion:This file is used on hundreds (perhaps thousands) of pages, including several Grammy-related FLs, and it hasn't been nominated for deletion before. What specifically concerns you about its free status?
Adabow (
talk)
08:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry for not responding. I believe that should be removed since there is no information regarding charts and sales info. Should I nominated it again? It took a long time for a 2nd opinion on that grammy sculpture. Thank you
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
14:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The ones that say changes domain are fine. The only one that continues to be a problem is the romanialibera.ro domain link. It seems to be redirecting as if the link was not evergreened and is now dead.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
04:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC)reply
--I don't understand when you mean "link the billboard charts" can you show me an example? Same goes for Radio 1. No cover have charted. I don't believe is such a thing regarding the list of "best selling digital singles of all time"
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
15:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)reply
"Artists and repertoire (A&R) is the division of a record label or music publishing company that is responsible for talent scouting and overseeing the artistic development of recording artists and/or songwriters. It also acts as a liaison between artists and the record label or publishing company; every activity involving artists to the point of album release is generally considered under the purview of, and responsibility of, A&R." - wiki. I have put a disambiguation link to the definition. Ok I will find more two or three that I have seen. I ahve moved the version by Pierce the Veil including the single infobox but I don't think it's important the infobox and it also ruins the article so we could delete it. What's your opinion?
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
02:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)reply
You linked it to the second use. I moved the link to the first use. Even linked it does not provide context. Please re-evaluate and consider how to clear this up. Maybe add a word or two. Is an A&R a type of representative?--03:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
I was saying that I didn't no I had to quote the instrumentation and vocal range. I only thought it was the reviews of the song describing it. Everything it's quoted.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
21:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Ok, I get it now. Sorry but I never did something like this before so some terms are new to me and I might missintrepert some vocabulary. Now it's correct, please check it. Thank You
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
00:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I have linked instumentation and vocal range(relevant wikilinks regarding the composition of the song). I was just saying that the majority of FA and GA articles have wikilinks on that section.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
12:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I am putting this On Hold. I will monitor progress and review this after 7 days.
I have improved what you asked until the Track Listening section, could you take a look? Thank You.Also the "Chart precession and succession" section is organized by dates, when the single first reached number one.
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I have another show on the live performances. How many are needed? I have added some text to the Track Listening it is that what you are looking for? I have replaced some of the dead links, also.
My point is the text never describes him arranging the media in the shape of him playing the piano. Furthermore the whole description of what he does with the media is unsourced. I.e., now it may be more a problem with the prose in this section.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD)
08:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
File:Grammy.jpg notes some reservations about the PD status. I need a 2nd opinion on that.
Second opinion:This file is used on hundreds (perhaps thousands) of pages, including several Grammy-related FLs, and it hasn't been nominated for deletion before. What specifically concerns you about its free status?
Adabow (
talk)
08:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry for not responding. I believe that should be removed since there is no information regarding charts and sales info. Should I nominated it again? It took a long time for a 2nd opinion on that grammy sculpture. Thank you
MarioSoulTruthFan (
talk)
14:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.