This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Just Stand Up! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems that the multiple singles chronologies were removed for making the page "too messy". I find this reason odd seeing as how the information was tabulated according to an established template, but still, whatever. Anyway, I'm here to make the case for restoring the various singles chronologies, as otherwise, about a dozen different chronologies will find themselves broken up at the point when they get to this song. Thoughts? Opinions? -- Jayunderscorezero ( talk) 13:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
No it wont if the article longer it wont.
The chronologies should go and the song should state that it was made by various artists and not just Mariah Carey. THE evil fluffyface ( talk) 10:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Note that this single is not credited to each artist, but as a "group". That is, it's not Beyonce/Mariah/Fergie/et. al, but as "Artists Stand Up To Cancer". Therefore, especially considering the number of artists that appear, it's just not feasible. The sidebar/infobox, for example, looks ridiculous. Also, don't most of the single chronology templates allow for a "other singles" section? Can't it just go in there? SKS2K6 ( talk) 22:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Should we add a singles chronology for all the artists? OutbackKidd ( talk) 21:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
The infoboxes would indeed mess up the page, but what if we added the chronologies in boxes under the main text? Like the boxes which show which song preceded/succeeded a song on the Billboard charts. Just an idea. – Alensha talk 23:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Just Stand Up! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems that the multiple singles chronologies were removed for making the page "too messy". I find this reason odd seeing as how the information was tabulated according to an established template, but still, whatever. Anyway, I'm here to make the case for restoring the various singles chronologies, as otherwise, about a dozen different chronologies will find themselves broken up at the point when they get to this song. Thoughts? Opinions? -- Jayunderscorezero ( talk) 13:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
No it wont if the article longer it wont.
The chronologies should go and the song should state that it was made by various artists and not just Mariah Carey. THE evil fluffyface ( talk) 10:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Note that this single is not credited to each artist, but as a "group". That is, it's not Beyonce/Mariah/Fergie/et. al, but as "Artists Stand Up To Cancer". Therefore, especially considering the number of artists that appear, it's just not feasible. The sidebar/infobox, for example, looks ridiculous. Also, don't most of the single chronology templates allow for a "other singles" section? Can't it just go in there? SKS2K6 ( talk) 22:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Should we add a singles chronology for all the artists? OutbackKidd ( talk) 21:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
The infoboxes would indeed mess up the page, but what if we added the chronologies in boxes under the main text? Like the boxes which show which song preceded/succeeded a song on the Billboard charts. Just an idea. – Alensha talk 23:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)