Hello, I am
Unionhawk. I will be reviewing this article. This is my first time with a GA review, so, if I make a mistake, accept apologies in advance. Anyway, let's get on this.
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Like I said, there are issues with the lead, but not much more. You have 7 days. If you wish that I re-review before that 7 day period, leave me a message on
my talk page.
I'm not entirely sure what appears as original research in the lead, as most of it is repeated in the main body of the article. I guess I must be missing it, so could you point it out instead? I have, however done some general copy editing. -- Atalk/contribs 04:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I've taken a quick look at the article, to me it looks good. Reference #55 needs to be properly formatted, though.
CarpetCrawlermessage me 04:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
re: "Just Dance" review
Apparently, I was unclear about the lead. I'm saying that 2 in-line citations isn't enough for how long the lead is.--
UnionhawkTalk 17:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Well... there's four in-line citations now. Nothing else is
worth citing as it's repeated in the article and likely won't be challenged information. -- Atalk/contribs 19:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Fair enough. I did not know about that guideline before. If you are ready, let me know.--
UnionhawkTalk 19:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Well, as I've just rid (definate) original research from lead I think we're ready. Thanks to fellow users for pointing out errors. -- Atalk/contribs 21:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
All right. I'll take a good look.--
UnionhawkTalk 00:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Hello, I am
Unionhawk. I will be reviewing this article. This is my first time with a GA review, so, if I make a mistake, accept apologies in advance. Anyway, let's get on this.
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Like I said, there are issues with the lead, but not much more. You have 7 days. If you wish that I re-review before that 7 day period, leave me a message on
my talk page.
I'm not entirely sure what appears as original research in the lead, as most of it is repeated in the main body of the article. I guess I must be missing it, so could you point it out instead? I have, however done some general copy editing. -- Atalk/contribs 04:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I've taken a quick look at the article, to me it looks good. Reference #55 needs to be properly formatted, though.
CarpetCrawlermessage me 04:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
re: "Just Dance" review
Apparently, I was unclear about the lead. I'm saying that 2 in-line citations isn't enough for how long the lead is.--
UnionhawkTalk 17:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Well... there's four in-line citations now. Nothing else is
worth citing as it's repeated in the article and likely won't be challenged information. -- Atalk/contribs 19:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Fair enough. I did not know about that guideline before. If you are ready, let me know.--
UnionhawkTalk 19:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Well, as I've just rid (definate) original research from lead I think we're ready. Thanks to fellow users for pointing out errors. -- Atalk/contribs 21:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)reply
All right. I'll take a good look.--
UnionhawkTalk 00:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)reply