This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Operations Mid‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the Operations task force. Switzerland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Jura-Foot-Railway.

Wouldn't that be "a winding section"? -- User:Haraldmmueller 17:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Good question. Both statements are valid from a language point of view, but mean different things. Windy would mean it was susceptible to high winds. Winding would mean it suffered from excessive curvature. If I had to, I'd guess that the original editor meant 'winding' rather than 'windy', but it is just a guess. A source would help, so I've asked for one. -- chris_j_wood ( talk) 16:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC) reply

It's certainly rather "winding", I live near this line and know it. That's just my personal experience however, don't have a source right now. Gestumblindi ( talk) 22:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC) reply