 | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Why is this article referred to as "Jupiter LI" and not "S/20120 J1"? All other satellites with provisional designations are referred to with this standard. 134340Goat ( talk) 19:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @ 134340Goat: Probably because this satellite and Jupiter LII have gotten their Roman numerals, but not names. Double sharp ( talk) 08:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Stub-Class Solar System articles
- Low-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 6 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Why is this article referred to as "Jupiter LI" and not "S/20120 J1"? All other satellites with provisional designations are referred to with this standard. 134340Goat ( talk) 19:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @ 134340Goat: Probably because this satellite and Jupiter LII have gotten their Roman numerals, but not names. Double sharp ( talk) 08:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Stub-Class Solar System articles
- Low-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force