This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Months in the 1900s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Months in the 1900sWikipedia:WikiProject Months in the 1900sTemplate:WikiProject Months in the 1900sMonths in the 1900s articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Most agreed that the month is the
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC based on long-term significance. A strong argument with respect to pageviews was given, but a clear majority seems to have felt long-term significance to be more important. (
non-admin closure) VRtalk 13:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Ahecht:If anything,
June 1976 (album) would be the primary topic, as it gets three times the page views. Defaulting to the disambig page is fine. --
Ahecht (
TALK PAGE) 16:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per long-term significance and consistency. Chronological entities pretty consistently get top billing and it takes a lot to dethrone them.
1984 is the primary topic over
Nineteen Eighty-Four despite the latter getting over 10x the pageviews. --
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support the month is the primary topic by long-term significance.
User:力 (power~enwiki,
π,
ν) 02:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per the arguments laid out by King of Hearts.
ModernDayTrilobite (
talk) 19:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose.
Pageviews indicate most people landing on
June 1976 are probably looking for the album. (Nineteen Eighty-Four is usually written out, so there's no title conflict in that case, unlike here.)
Station1 (
talk) 06:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
No, they don't. The only thing the pageviews indicate is that every person landing on
June 1976 (album) landed on it, and similarly for
June 1976. For all anyone knows, they may have landed at the album by clicking an internal or external link, be it from a search or another page.
85.67.32.244 (
talk) 14:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE--
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)reply
They do. For every 4 people reading about the album, fewer than one is reading about the month. It is reasonable to assume, then, that people landing on the dab page probably (not provably) want those two articles in a very roughly similar proportion. What we can say with certainty, though, is that the evidence does not point to a majority of readers wanting to read about a month.
Station1 (
talk) 16:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I really don't think we can infer with any certainty what readers who land at the DAB are looking for; perhaps they're looking for
June 1976 in meteorology. We can't actually even say that a majority of readers want to read about the album: we might have one avid Grateful Dead fan who loads the page on average 23+3⁄4 times a day (perhaps they have a 15-minute tea break). I'm not saying either of those are likely, of course. But when the DAB page is averaging one hit every 1.4 days, some of which will be bot activity, I think it is difficult to draw any conclusions about what readers expect to find or do at the DAB page.
85.67.32.244 (
talk) 22:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE--
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per nom and per points above. In terms of long-term significance, the name of the month will always end up being primary.
BD2412T 21:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. Clear
WP:PTOPIC#2, long-term significance. For an analogous case, the PTOPIC for
apple is the fruit, even though
Apple, Inc. gets four times the pageviews.
Narky Blert (
talk) 13:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Months in the 1900s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Months in the 1900sWikipedia:WikiProject Months in the 1900sTemplate:WikiProject Months in the 1900sMonths in the 1900s articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Most agreed that the month is the
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC based on long-term significance. A strong argument with respect to pageviews was given, but a clear majority seems to have felt long-term significance to be more important. (
non-admin closure) VRtalk 13:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Ahecht:If anything,
June 1976 (album) would be the primary topic, as it gets three times the page views. Defaulting to the disambig page is fine. --
Ahecht (
TALK PAGE) 16:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per long-term significance and consistency. Chronological entities pretty consistently get top billing and it takes a lot to dethrone them.
1984 is the primary topic over
Nineteen Eighty-Four despite the latter getting over 10x the pageviews. --
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support the month is the primary topic by long-term significance.
User:力 (power~enwiki,
π,
ν) 02:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per the arguments laid out by King of Hearts.
ModernDayTrilobite (
talk) 19:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Oppose.
Pageviews indicate most people landing on
June 1976 are probably looking for the album. (Nineteen Eighty-Four is usually written out, so there's no title conflict in that case, unlike here.)
Station1 (
talk) 06:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
No, they don't. The only thing the pageviews indicate is that every person landing on
June 1976 (album) landed on it, and similarly for
June 1976. For all anyone knows, they may have landed at the album by clicking an internal or external link, be it from a search or another page.
85.67.32.244 (
talk) 14:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE--
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)reply
They do. For every 4 people reading about the album, fewer than one is reading about the month. It is reasonable to assume, then, that people landing on the dab page probably (not provably) want those two articles in a very roughly similar proportion. What we can say with certainty, though, is that the evidence does not point to a majority of readers wanting to read about a month.
Station1 (
talk) 16:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I really don't think we can infer with any certainty what readers who land at the DAB are looking for; perhaps they're looking for
June 1976 in meteorology. We can't actually even say that a majority of readers want to read about the album: we might have one avid Grateful Dead fan who loads the page on average 23+3⁄4 times a day (perhaps they have a 15-minute tea break). I'm not saying either of those are likely, of course. But when the DAB page is averaging one hit every 1.4 days, some of which will be bot activity, I think it is difficult to draw any conclusions about what readers expect to find or do at the DAB page.
85.67.32.244 (
talk) 22:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)WP:SOCKSTRIKE--
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support per nom and per points above. In terms of long-term significance, the name of the month will always end up being primary.
BD2412T 21:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Support. Clear
WP:PTOPIC#2, long-term significance. For an analogous case, the PTOPIC for
apple is the fruit, even though
Apple, Inc. gets four times the pageviews.
Narky Blert (
talk) 13:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.