This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my effort to merge the now-deleted list from the article Gay icon to the Gay icons category, I have added this page to the category. I engaged in this effort as a "human script", adding everyone from the list to the category, bypassing the fact-checking stage. That is what I am relying on you to do. Please check the article Gay icon and make a judgment as to whether this person or group fits the category. By distributing this task from the regular editors of one article to the regular editors of several articles, I believe that the task of fact-checking this information can be expedited. Thank you very much. Philwelch 21:46, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Does anyone have a reliable source for the date of birth. I do not trust this edit. It appears to be an attempt by someone at Encyclopædia Britannica to discredit Wikipedia and was made along with a series of vandalistic edits like this one. Angela . 10:36, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Is there any reason to suppose that her stated measurements--those of a fit young woman--are remotely accurate now, given that she is 70? (At the very least, most people lose height.) Is there even a reason to mention these? This aims to be an encyclopedia, not a pinup calendar. I notice that Alec Guinness and John Wayne--two other distinguished actors--do not have their measurements given.
Hey---John Wayne's measurements did matter. Wayne's being 6'3" became a "character trait" for him-- I'd like to see her "Batmsn" performances to see Her use her height and dance background in such An exaggerated show. Jonhendryj ( talk) 15:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't the photo be more representative of the reason for a person's notability (eg. their career) rather than just the newest image we could find? The current photo is pretty gross. What next -- will we use this one for Paul Newman? -- Doradus ( talk) 23:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Gross? What do you mean? The picture is just fine and portrays the actress well. Also, I think using that photo for Paul Newman is a great idea. Thanks for suggesting it, P3d0. -- James599 ( talk) 21:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
¶ I would suggest a photo from the height of her cinema/TV career, an image more readily recognized and more relevant. But also, I'd like some comment on her distinctive diction, which seemed very precise but not effortless; it was particularly appropriate for her role on My Living Doll, but it clearly stayed with her throughout her career. Sussmanbern ( talk) 06:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC) And WHEN did Mugler make her his catwalk icon?? Sussmanbern ( talk) 06:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree that having such a recent photo is both unnecessary and misleading. I'm changing it to something from the peak of her career. Buck Mulligan ( talk) 15:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Julie Newmar's appearance in the Film, Enter Laughing, written and directed by Carl Reiner is not mentioned. She is not credited in the film on IMDB. It was from 1967. 104.184.208.119 ( talk) 02:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Julie highlighted her love of flower gardening. 173.48.198.26 ( talk) 22:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my effort to merge the now-deleted list from the article Gay icon to the Gay icons category, I have added this page to the category. I engaged in this effort as a "human script", adding everyone from the list to the category, bypassing the fact-checking stage. That is what I am relying on you to do. Please check the article Gay icon and make a judgment as to whether this person or group fits the category. By distributing this task from the regular editors of one article to the regular editors of several articles, I believe that the task of fact-checking this information can be expedited. Thank you very much. Philwelch 21:46, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Does anyone have a reliable source for the date of birth. I do not trust this edit. It appears to be an attempt by someone at Encyclopædia Britannica to discredit Wikipedia and was made along with a series of vandalistic edits like this one. Angela . 10:36, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Is there any reason to suppose that her stated measurements--those of a fit young woman--are remotely accurate now, given that she is 70? (At the very least, most people lose height.) Is there even a reason to mention these? This aims to be an encyclopedia, not a pinup calendar. I notice that Alec Guinness and John Wayne--two other distinguished actors--do not have their measurements given.
Hey---John Wayne's measurements did matter. Wayne's being 6'3" became a "character trait" for him-- I'd like to see her "Batmsn" performances to see Her use her height and dance background in such An exaggerated show. Jonhendryj ( talk) 15:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Shouldn't the photo be more representative of the reason for a person's notability (eg. their career) rather than just the newest image we could find? The current photo is pretty gross. What next -- will we use this one for Paul Newman? -- Doradus ( talk) 23:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Gross? What do you mean? The picture is just fine and portrays the actress well. Also, I think using that photo for Paul Newman is a great idea. Thanks for suggesting it, P3d0. -- James599 ( talk) 21:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
¶ I would suggest a photo from the height of her cinema/TV career, an image more readily recognized and more relevant. But also, I'd like some comment on her distinctive diction, which seemed very precise but not effortless; it was particularly appropriate for her role on My Living Doll, but it clearly stayed with her throughout her career. Sussmanbern ( talk) 06:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC) And WHEN did Mugler make her his catwalk icon?? Sussmanbern ( talk) 06:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree that having such a recent photo is both unnecessary and misleading. I'm changing it to something from the peak of her career. Buck Mulligan ( talk) 15:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Julie Newmar's appearance in the Film, Enter Laughing, written and directed by Carl Reiner is not mentioned. She is not credited in the film on IMDB. It was from 1967. 104.184.208.119 ( talk) 02:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Julie highlighted her love of flower gardening. 173.48.198.26 ( talk) 22:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)