This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Julia Marciari-Alexander article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lwnsofd, you need to provide reliable sourced that explicitly discuss her direct involvement. You are citing unreliable sources on the matter, namely the opinion article in The Baltimore Sun, the website of a law firm that works for the museum (which has no mention of Marciari-Alexander), and a letter written by her (a primary source) to draw conclusions on her alleged union-busting. We stick to covering what reliable sources have discussed about the subject, as detailed on our Wikipedia:Verifiability page. The Sun's report on the sick employees in August 2021 and the Bmore Art and WYPR articles you cited look to be good, secondary sources on the matter, which I kept in my revision. Bridget (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Marciari-Alexander has not publicly responded to Scott's 2022 letter [1] requesting that she discontinue her stonewalling efforts and allow the employees to hold an independent union election.While the AFRO article discusses Scott's letter and his support for Walters Workers United, it doesn't discuss Marciari-Alexander's (lack of) response or the museum's efforts to oppose the union. Only one sentence of Scott's actual letter (not the article) talks about how the museum is not "following the path" of unionization.
References
@ Lwnsofd:: Your addition on the subject's divorce only cites a court record and violates Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons, specifically the section on using primary sources located at WP:BLPPRIMARY. Here is a relevant excerpt from this policy:
Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy,
no original research, and the other sourcing policies.
I can't find any press through Google and Newspapers.com covering her divorce. Please only restore the content if you can replace the court record with an appropriate source that talks about the divorce. Best, Bridget (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC) (edited 23:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC))
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Julia Marciari-Alexander article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lwnsofd, you need to provide reliable sourced that explicitly discuss her direct involvement. You are citing unreliable sources on the matter, namely the opinion article in The Baltimore Sun, the website of a law firm that works for the museum (which has no mention of Marciari-Alexander), and a letter written by her (a primary source) to draw conclusions on her alleged union-busting. We stick to covering what reliable sources have discussed about the subject, as detailed on our Wikipedia:Verifiability page. The Sun's report on the sick employees in August 2021 and the Bmore Art and WYPR articles you cited look to be good, secondary sources on the matter, which I kept in my revision. Bridget (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Marciari-Alexander has not publicly responded to Scott's 2022 letter [1] requesting that she discontinue her stonewalling efforts and allow the employees to hold an independent union election.While the AFRO article discusses Scott's letter and his support for Walters Workers United, it doesn't discuss Marciari-Alexander's (lack of) response or the museum's efforts to oppose the union. Only one sentence of Scott's actual letter (not the article) talks about how the museum is not "following the path" of unionization.
References
@ Lwnsofd:: Your addition on the subject's divorce only cites a court record and violates Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons, specifically the section on using primary sources located at WP:BLPPRIMARY. Here is a relevant excerpt from this policy:
Exercise extreme caution in using primary sources. Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses. Where primary-source material has been discussed by a reliable secondary source, it may be acceptable to rely on it to augment the secondary source, subject to the restrictions of this policy,
no original research, and the other sourcing policies.
I can't find any press through Google and Newspapers.com covering her divorce. Please only restore the content if you can replace the court record with an appropriate source that talks about the divorce. Best, Bridget (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC) (edited 23:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC))