This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@
Timelezz:, I placed the unreliable sources tag because the some references you have provided are not reliable/good references. eg.(Blog, Youtube). See
WP:GOODREFS. It is best to avoid these kind of sources. Being a BLP (Biographies of Living People) article I thought the tag would help bring article better sources. A BLP article must be Verifiable and must hold undisputed contents. See
WP:BLP. Ping me if I'm doing a mistake! Cheers!
--
†ããrøn95
®
10:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Jaaron95, I disagree that these references fall under "self-published sources as third-party sources" according to WP:SPS" The video link reference are there to proof that she was speaker/moderator at these events. Julia Galef did not publish these videos herself, but the video producer or the event organization. Self-publication sources are not allowed, as these sources of information are more prone to (self-)framing and thus unreliable. Here the video links are only as proof that she was speaker at these events, increasing verifiability. It is unlikely that the whole content of the video is a set-up to frame it as if she was a speaker. That would be one huge conspiracy :D. Kind regards, Timelezz ( talk) 14:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I removed some trivia in the biography section, which was way too long given this person's relative lack of notability. (Compare to this academic: Barbara Wold, who's arguably more notable and has far less detail.) This article feels promotional and unserious, like a personal webpage. However, my edits were reversed without explanation. I'd appreciate if others would cooperate with me in cleaning up this page. Pawg14 ( talk) 03:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
It looks like this article is still suffering from sources that are either closely tied to the subject, not reliable, or don't really establish notability. I added one RS to the lede, but the whole text needs a rewrite, and I would not be surprised if other editors out there find it worthy of an AfD or at least a major content purge. IMO, she appears to pass notability, but there are not too many sources out there that cover her in a meaningful way to write a biographical entry on WP. Delta13C ( talk) 09:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Julia Galef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@
Timelezz:, I placed the unreliable sources tag because the some references you have provided are not reliable/good references. eg.(Blog, Youtube). See
WP:GOODREFS. It is best to avoid these kind of sources. Being a BLP (Biographies of Living People) article I thought the tag would help bring article better sources. A BLP article must be Verifiable and must hold undisputed contents. See
WP:BLP. Ping me if I'm doing a mistake! Cheers!
--
†ããrøn95
®
10:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Jaaron95, I disagree that these references fall under "self-published sources as third-party sources" according to WP:SPS" The video link reference are there to proof that she was speaker/moderator at these events. Julia Galef did not publish these videos herself, but the video producer or the event organization. Self-publication sources are not allowed, as these sources of information are more prone to (self-)framing and thus unreliable. Here the video links are only as proof that she was speaker at these events, increasing verifiability. It is unlikely that the whole content of the video is a set-up to frame it as if she was a speaker. That would be one huge conspiracy :D. Kind regards, Timelezz ( talk) 14:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I removed some trivia in the biography section, which was way too long given this person's relative lack of notability. (Compare to this academic: Barbara Wold, who's arguably more notable and has far less detail.) This article feels promotional and unserious, like a personal webpage. However, my edits were reversed without explanation. I'd appreciate if others would cooperate with me in cleaning up this page. Pawg14 ( talk) 03:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
It looks like this article is still suffering from sources that are either closely tied to the subject, not reliable, or don't really establish notability. I added one RS to the lede, but the whole text needs a rewrite, and I would not be surprised if other editors out there find it worthy of an AfD or at least a major content purge. IMO, she appears to pass notability, but there are not too many sources out there that cover her in a meaningful way to write a biographical entry on WP. Delta13C ( talk) 09:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Julia Galef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)