This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Judiciary of California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
I made some edits to the second paragraph that got reverted. If you read the link in the source that is cited for the second paragraph you will not find any of the information that is mentioned. You will, however, find similar information but with different numbers.
It is possible that I don't understand how the citations work, if the information is, in fact, in the links and if everything is done correctly then please let me know.
I would court in California take my money out at 1 o’clock in the morning when I live in Texas 47.190.163.97 ( talk) 11:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Judiciary of California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
I made some edits to the second paragraph that got reverted. If you read the link in the source that is cited for the second paragraph you will not find any of the information that is mentioned. You will, however, find similar information but with different numbers.
It is possible that I don't understand how the citations work, if the information is, in fact, in the links and if everything is done correctly then please let me know.
I would court in California take my money out at 1 o’clock in the morning when I live in Texas 47.190.163.97 ( talk) 11:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)