This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request.
Favonian (
talk) 16:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Judeţ →
Județ – Correct Romanian diacritic. The current one is turkish. See the Romanian article for comparison.
Gikü (
talk) 12:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Support tentatively. We have some articles already using t-comma rather than t-cedilla, for instance
Galați, and it should display on most modern computers (although not part of
WGL-4). It is true though that many online Romanian sites (including news media) continue to use t-cedilla because of lingering display concerns for somewhat older computers. —
P.T. Aufrette (
talk) 06:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Support. The use of
t-cedilla (ţ) instead of the
t-comma (ț) was due to technical limitations (see
T-comma article for details). Now that those are of fading relevance, move to the correct spelling. Last year, there were similar moves conducted (see
here,
here, and
here for the discussions). —
AjaxSmack 01:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Romania-
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request.
Favonian (
talk) 16:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Judeţ →
Județ – Correct Romanian diacritic. The current one is turkish. See the Romanian article for comparison.
Gikü (
talk) 12:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Support tentatively. We have some articles already using t-comma rather than t-cedilla, for instance
Galați, and it should display on most modern computers (although not part of
WGL-4). It is true though that many online Romanian sites (including news media) continue to use t-cedilla because of lingering display concerns for somewhat older computers. —
P.T. Aufrette (
talk) 06:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Support. The use of
t-cedilla (ţ) instead of the
t-comma (ț) was due to technical limitations (see
T-comma article for details). Now that those are of fading relevance, move to the correct spelling. Last year, there were similar moves conducted (see
here,
here, and
here for the discussions). —
AjaxSmack 01:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.