(Redirected from
Talk:Judeţ)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian ( talk) 16:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Judeţ → Județ – Correct Romanian diacritic. The current one is turkish. See the Romanian article for comparison. Gikü ( talk) 12:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Can you please link to WP:Naming conventions (Romanian) or equivalent. ţ (Turkic T-cedilla) may not be perfectly the same but it least it shows up normally, wheras ț (Romanian T-comma) shows up as T "JudeT". In ictu oculi ( talk) 03:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support tentatively. We have some articles already using t-comma rather than t-cedilla, for instance Galați, and it should display on most modern computers (although not part of WGL-4). It is true though that many online Romanian sites (including news media) continue to use t-cedilla because of lingering display concerns for somewhat older computers. — P.T. Aufrette ( talk) 06:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. The use of t-cedilla (ţ) instead of the t-comma (ț) was due to technical limitations (see T-comma article for details). Now that those are of fading relevance, move to the correct spelling. Last year, there were similar moves conducted (see here, here, and here for the discussions). — AjaxSmack 01:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- support per ajaxsmack. -- Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) 00:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
(Redirected from
Talk:Judeţ)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian ( talk) 16:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Judeţ → Județ – Correct Romanian diacritic. The current one is turkish. See the Romanian article for comparison. Gikü ( talk) 12:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Can you please link to WP:Naming conventions (Romanian) or equivalent. ţ (Turkic T-cedilla) may not be perfectly the same but it least it shows up normally, wheras ț (Romanian T-comma) shows up as T "JudeT". In ictu oculi ( talk) 03:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support tentatively. We have some articles already using t-comma rather than t-cedilla, for instance Galați, and it should display on most modern computers (although not part of WGL-4). It is true though that many online Romanian sites (including news media) continue to use t-cedilla because of lingering display concerns for somewhat older computers. — P.T. Aufrette ( talk) 06:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. The use of t-cedilla (ţ) instead of the t-comma (ț) was due to technical limitations (see T-comma article for details). Now that those are of fading relevance, move to the correct spelling. Last year, there were similar moves conducted (see here, here, and here for the discussions). — AjaxSmack 01:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- support per ajaxsmack. -- Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) 00:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.