This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be merged with the Hose clamp article because 1) this is not the first type of worm gear hose clamp, 2) this is not the most commonly used term for a hose clamp, and 3) this article is misleading in that it implies leads the reader to believe that the first worm gear hose clamp was the "Jubilee Clip." which is merely a brand name of a worm gear hose clamp variation. This would be excellent and noteworthy content for the worm gear hose clamp section of the Hose Clamp article. Unlike the previous merger proposal, this proposal would redirect this to Hose clamp Nicholas SL Smith chatter 04:24, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hose Clamp should be merged with this page as the Jubilee clip as Jubilee clip is the original name for a hose clamp ( Fdsdh1 ( talk) 11:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC))
Could we get a picture of the genuine article (showing the trade name), not jsut a generic stand-in? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 15:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
If "It remains the term used in everyday speech in the UK and Ireland" is true, then the term, not the trademark, is notable. 66.19.94.144 ( talk) 11:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Why is it called a jubilee clip? And in the "Company" section, it talks about the government officials wanting to take over the company, but it sounds like there was no incorporated company until later, and it was just a sole trader business at that point. Should the article be using the more general term "business", rather than "company"? Finally, what was the purpose of Robinson's wife's deed poll? How would that have affected her claim to the business? A deed poll does not in itself "change your name," and besides, she was already Robinson's widow so what did she have to prove? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.26.234 ( talk) 15:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I just love the information about the inventor, which has clearly been added by someone who wants to keep his memory alive. This is what Wikipedia is really good at, capturing first-hand information that you couldn't find anywhere else. Sadly, it's what Wikipedia policy tries to kill off - you're not supposed to put anything in that hasn't already been published elsewhere. Long live those who know when to ignore such policies. Mhkay ( talk) 06:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be merged with the Hose clamp article because 1) this is not the first type of worm gear hose clamp, 2) this is not the most commonly used term for a hose clamp, and 3) this article is misleading in that it implies leads the reader to believe that the first worm gear hose clamp was the "Jubilee Clip." which is merely a brand name of a worm gear hose clamp variation. This would be excellent and noteworthy content for the worm gear hose clamp section of the Hose Clamp article. Unlike the previous merger proposal, this proposal would redirect this to Hose clamp Nicholas SL Smith chatter 04:24, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hose Clamp should be merged with this page as the Jubilee clip as Jubilee clip is the original name for a hose clamp ( Fdsdh1 ( talk) 11:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC))
Could we get a picture of the genuine article (showing the trade name), not jsut a generic stand-in? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 15:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
If "It remains the term used in everyday speech in the UK and Ireland" is true, then the term, not the trademark, is notable. 66.19.94.144 ( talk) 11:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Why is it called a jubilee clip? And in the "Company" section, it talks about the government officials wanting to take over the company, but it sounds like there was no incorporated company until later, and it was just a sole trader business at that point. Should the article be using the more general term "business", rather than "company"? Finally, what was the purpose of Robinson's wife's deed poll? How would that have affected her claim to the business? A deed poll does not in itself "change your name," and besides, she was already Robinson's widow so what did she have to prove? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.26.234 ( talk) 15:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I just love the information about the inventor, which has clearly been added by someone who wants to keep his memory alive. This is what Wikipedia is really good at, capturing first-hand information that you couldn't find anywhere else. Sadly, it's what Wikipedia policy tries to kill off - you're not supposed to put anything in that hasn't already been published elsewhere. Long live those who know when to ignore such policies. Mhkay ( talk) 06:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)