This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Node.js has been run by a foundation since before 4.0, and it specifically was a community decision to exit Joyent's stewardship; this was accomplished through a fork (io.js). I think it's misleading to list Node.js as "a Joyent product". --
Sigmundur (
talk)
09:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)reply
They can be said to have 'sponsored' node.js for awhile, but then (perhaps after one of the many changes in Joyent leadership?) they used that position to nearly sabotage node.js, its governance, and any contributors that happened not to work for Joyent. They are not "in good odor" in the node.js community, and to see this in the article is like seeing a claim that Napolean made Russia a success.
Shenme (
talk)
21:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Node.js has been run by a foundation since before 4.0, and it specifically was a community decision to exit Joyent's stewardship; this was accomplished through a fork (io.js). I think it's misleading to list Node.js as "a Joyent product". --
Sigmundur (
talk)
09:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)reply
They can be said to have 'sponsored' node.js for awhile, but then (perhaps after one of the many changes in Joyent leadership?) they used that position to nearly sabotage node.js, its governance, and any contributors that happened not to work for Joyent. They are not "in good odor" in the node.js community, and to see this in the article is like seeing a claim that Napolean made Russia a success.
Shenme (
talk)
21:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply