This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
@
Randykitty: I'm a bit confused by your
changing the publisher from Taylor & Francis to Routledge. I realise Routledge is now owned by T&F, but the
journal's website says e.g. Trustees of Boston University and our publisher Taylor & Francis
and the editorial cited for the publication history also says Taylor & Francis. No mention of Routledge as far as I can tell? –
Joe (
talk) 18:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello.
I'm not sure of the meaning of "classical" in "it has been cited as an example of a journal that bridges the divide between anthropological archaeology and classical archaeology".
If this "classical" is used in the sense of "normal", then a link to "classical" archeology (in the sense of "archeology of the classical era") is not pertinent.
Regards, Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 15:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
@
Randykitty: I'm a bit confused by your
changing the publisher from Taylor & Francis to Routledge. I realise Routledge is now owned by T&F, but the
journal's website says e.g. Trustees of Boston University and our publisher Taylor & Francis
and the editorial cited for the publication history also says Taylor & Francis. No mention of Routledge as far as I can tell? –
Joe (
talk) 18:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello.
I'm not sure of the meaning of "classical" in "it has been cited as an example of a journal that bridges the divide between anthropological archaeology and classical archaeology".
If this "classical" is used in the sense of "normal", then a link to "classical" archeology (in the sense of "archeology of the classical era") is not pertinent.
Regards, Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 15:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)