A fact from Jost de Negker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,203 times ( disclaimer) ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Jost de Negker cut a chiaroscuro woodcut with seven different colour-blocks, a record number for a German Renaissance print? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/March.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Belgium This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I note in Erwin Panofsky, Renaissance and Renascences, 2nd ed. p. 2 "...we shall find it easy to set down the invention of detachable flourishes as an 'influential innovation' attributed to Jost de Negker". I assume Panofsky meant printers' vignettes. This was news to me, perhaps to others, but Panofsky mentions it in passing as if widely agreed... -- Wetman ( talk) 05:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC) reply