Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On July 27, 2021 a circular issued by the bishop that announces sops for families in the Diocese of Pala with five or more children, invited criticism from various corners.[1][2] A remark from the bishop made on Sept 9, 2021 that Christian girls are falling prey to love jihad and narcotic jihad triggered a controversy in the state of Kerala.[3][4]
please remove this Jjosephv ( talk) 03:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Controversies
please change this title to Recent Interventions
On July 27, 2021 a circular issued by the bishop that announces sops for families in the Diocese of Pala with five or more children, invited criticism from various corners.[1][2] A remark from the bishop made on Sept 9, 2021 that Christian girls are falling prey to love jihad and narcotic jihad triggered a controversy in the state of Kerala.[3][4]
change this to
On July 27, 2021 a circular issued by the bishop that announces sops for families in the Diocese of Pala with five or more children, accepted by the faithful .[1][2] A remark from the bishop made on Sept 9, 2021 that Christian girls are falling prey to love jihad and narcotic jihad was proved with recent events happened. Jjosephv ( talk) 03:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
Anon126 (
notify me of responses! /
talk /
contribs)
04:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
CONTROVERSIES UNAVAILABLE TINUMON THOMAS mj ( talk) 04:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The entire Love Jihad controversy section should be removed as the entire topic is an ongoing topic in the news on a statement made by the Bishop. Proponents and opponents are constantly modifying the page (where in one case) a user has made a altogether new Wiki page to further create false claims where the citations he had mentioned in only news channels which has stated what the Bishop has said and has no relation to the authenticity of the facts. Narco Jihad terminology has been in use for more than a decade with the US intelligence and United Nations report on drugs also mentioning the same [1] [2]. Recent arrests made in India where the arrested said the narcotics where being smuggled to destroy the non-muslims were also reported [3].
I suggest the section be removed and article locked in its entirety until the Government of India takes a stance on the matter and is resolved. Pottalogic ( talk) 14:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
14:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)References
@
Br Ibrahim john, the
WP:LEAD literally says It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.
. Where does the policy say lead must be concise?. You haven't explained why you are restoring a poorly sourced version with many unreliable sources in your talk page or in
User:Tayi Arajakate's talk page. I appears that you are attempting to White wash the article of the controversies the subject was involved in. -
SUN EYE 1
08:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. Of course, the lead must be concise. It must be the article in a nutshell. But here it is consuming almost quarter of the article. What's the point in that. And the comments from non notable people like some nuns, and removal of notable comments like that of the Church head, cannot be justified. Meanwhile, a rape case, probably related to Franco Mulackal is unrelated to the person and will be removed. Neutrality in Wikepedia means Wikepedia must not have a pov. Everything that's reliable, both in support and against must be added. Wikepedia must not give its own opinion to the viewers. Br Ibrahim john ( talk) 08:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X Kallarangatt is involved in a number of controversies over covering up of a sexual assault allegation in the Church laid against another bishop,[4][5] providing sops to influence Syro-Malabar Christian women to have four or more children,[6][7] and promoting conspiracy theories such as "love jihad" and "narcotics jihad".[8] He has also been accused of using the love and narcotics jihad controversy as a distraction from the sexual assault and corruption allegations surrounding the Church and to forge an alliance with the Hindutva movement in India, in an effort to prevent corruption investigations from agencies under the Narendra Modi government.[9][10][11]
Y Mar Joseph Kallarangatt heads the Palai diocese of the Syro-Malabar Church, one of the biggest Catholic churches in the state. The diocese is home to the largest concentration of Syro-Malabar Christians in Kerala. Kallarangatt, born in 1956 and ordained as a priest in 1982, is considered a scholar and authority on topics of theology within the Church. He has authored over 30 books. [9]He also alleged that young women, belonging to Christianity and other non-Muslim faiths, were being lured by ‘jihadis’ through ‘love jihad’ and subjected to exploitation, forced religious conversion and terrorist activities.[10]Joseph Kallarangatt is an Indian Catholic prelate and theologian, who is the 3rd Bishop of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Eparchy of Palai.[11]He is currently the chairman of the Syro-Malabar Synodal Commission for Family, Laity and Life and wields enormous clout within the Church. Indian2051 ( talk) 13:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
The article is misleading as a single antagonistic view point filled with hatred is used while making the profile of the bishop. This clearly shows that Wikipedia has been manipulated to harass a minority community and it's local head. Vija!!7 ( talk) 15:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some of the sources are not reliable Kokovosebastiano ( talk) 05:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Remove the reference that Joseph Kallarangatt is involved in the covering up of sexual allegation. The links to the charge sheet against bishop Franco is here: https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2020/08/13/charge-sheet-nun-rape-case-bishop-franco-mulakkal.html and https://theprint.in/india/police-file-chargesheet-against-bishop-franco-mulakkal-in-kerala-nun-rape-case/219243/ Remove all the erroneous claims in the article that connects joseph Kallarangatt with Bishop Franco mulakkal case Ezhuth ( talk) 09:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Based on tabloid accusation referred in Footnote 7,8 and 9, accusations that are far distant are amassed against Joseph Kallarangatt. violation of BLP rules Ezhuth ( talk) 04:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Ezhuth added a section to the article presenting a more detailed narrative of Kallarangatt's 8 September sermon, but one that generally is redundant to the section already in the article about it. Frankly, my concern is that this is a POV fork preventing a version of events that is more flattering to Kallarangatt. I don't think this editor is acting in bad faith—there has been some outright whitewashing of the article in the past—but I do think this editor can be placed, broadly, in the category of editors who have shown up with the intent of removing negative material from the article or otherwise trying to shine a positive light on the subject.
What material can we take from the new section and integrate into the pre-existing one? — C.Fred ( talk) 14:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The sermon quotes previous events with names of persons involved. How can we change the content of one's sermon Ezhuth ( talk) 20:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
When a particular sermon made by Joseph Kallarangatt becomes controversial for some reason, we should start from the sermons, its context; to be precise every text has context. Joseph Kallarangatt mentioned in his sermon several past and recent events including names that needs to be presented in an article about him. Wikipedia demands "an original interpretation or analysis of a source, or a synthesis of sources" Wikipedia:Libel - Ezhuth ( talk) 20:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
When we deal with a BLP, Wikipedia demands balance of presentation WP:BLPBALANCE The voice of the living person should be presented first of all WP:BLPKINDNESS. Two titles repeating the word "Controversy" and "2021" are in the article: "2018–2021: Controversies in the Church" and "2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy". It seems that term "Controversy" is too much highlighted. A sentence like "On 3 February 2020, Kallarangatt presided over the consecration function for Jose Pulickal's appointment as the 4th Bishop of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Eparchy of Kanjirappally.[15]" is even added under one of these titles. Impartial tone is needed in the presentation WP:BLPSTYLE "2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy" can be edited as "Controversies and reactions after the terms love and narcotic jihad". The content under the title can be retained since it concentrates on the reactions from various angles in the society. Ezhuth ( talk) 18:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLPKINDNESS is an ethics in creating BLP according to Wikipedia; something basic when you handle a living person who have a right to his or her good name. Happy that you don't accuse Wikipedia as a relative of Joseph Kallarangatt Your question in fact, belongs to the category of argumentum ad hominem - Ezhuth ( talk) 20:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
It is applicable if the subject himself/herself is not in the digital circle to comment for himself/herself. Also no attempt is made in the page to blank any writing already published. Nothing is treated as "problematic" and no attempt is made to "blank" it by inappropriate deletion. WP:BLPKINDNESS - Ezhuth ( talk) 20:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't think sermon itself has enough notability to list on the wiki page, the controversy around the speech made on that event is the notable event Abvayad ( talk) 05:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Allegations are always
opinions, otherwise, it must have PROOF, which makes it fact. Where is the evidence for the allegation [...] using the love and narcotics jihad controversy as a distraction from the sexual assault and corruption allegations surrounding the church and to forge an alliance with the Hindutva movement in India, in an effort to prevent corruption investigations [...]
? When did Wikipedia started publishing
conspiracy theories? Otherwise, provide proof. The three cited sources reports conspiracy theories by collecting "comments" from non-notable individuals, which violates
WP:BIASED and
WP:EXCEPTIONAL. How is that notable? Is this newspaper? They do not even qualify to add with an attribution. It is common when someone makes a controversial allegation, those opposing them makes counter allegations, but stitching those into Wikipedia is not encyclopedic,
WP:NOTADVOCACY and
WP:NOTOPINION. Remove.
117.230.91.62 (
talk)
14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
100 percent agree. Seems like masala content made way into wikipedia articles. Stripedkangaroo ( talk) 13:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessarily reverting instead of editing any mistakes in the sub section 2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy leads to suspect foul play and biased edits on a living person. Kindly step back from reverting and choose to make the edits for the better അദ്വൈതൻ ( talk) 12:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
( User talk: FrancisSobieski123)
The Hindutva proponent right wing Bharatiya Janata Party extended its full support to the bishop claiming that he was revealing the "truth" of a widespread conspiracy that everyone else was trying to hide, several senior state functionaries of the party visited him at his residence after the protests. Joseph Perumthottam, the Archbishop of his ecclesiastical province, Changanacherry had also granted his support to Kallarangatt. He endorsed the bishop through an article in the church controlled newspaper Deepika.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to request an addition to this article stating the contribution of Mar Joseph Kallarangattu in the establishment of a Quaternary care center called "Mar Sleeva Medicity". Also, I want to suggest an additional sentence stating that Bishop Mulakkal has been acquitted by the sessions court. FrancisSobieski123 ( talk) 00:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to request an addition to this article stating the contribution of Mar Joseph Kallarangattu in the establishment of a Quaternary care center called "Mar Sleeva Medicity". Also, I want to suggest an additional sentence stating that Bishop Mulakkal has been acquitted by the sessions court. FrancisSobieski123 ( talk) 11:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
This page Joseph Kallarangatt significantly violates WP:NPOV under the section Pastoral Ministry. അദ്വൈതൻ ( talk) 18:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
as of latest revision [2]
It was criticised for ignoring the large population boom in India and for going against the existent two-child norm in Kerala, the critics from within the Syro-Malabar community described it as an unethical and immoral scheme created for petty political gains and as interference in the sexual lives of married couples by unmarried clergy
The remarks attracted immediate and widespread condemnation from within the Christian community. [2]
From within the Syro-Malabar Church, the former spokesman of the Synod, Father Paul Thelakkat criticised Kallarangatt
former spokesperson,
within Syro Malabarthe context is ought to be included.
The Kerala Catholic Bishops' Council (KCBC) in which Kallarangatt and Perumthottam held influential positions released a statement…
In essence, this section of article gives a negative image all with the criticism of the Bishop while in reality equal and positive side exits(with reliable sources) are are left out. അദ്വൈതൻ ( talk) 17:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 07:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On July 27, 2021 a circular issued by the bishop that announces sops for families in the Diocese of Pala with five or more children, invited criticism from various corners.[1][2] A remark from the bishop made on Sept 9, 2021 that Christian girls are falling prey to love jihad and narcotic jihad triggered a controversy in the state of Kerala.[3][4]
please remove this Jjosephv ( talk) 03:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Controversies
please change this title to Recent Interventions
On July 27, 2021 a circular issued by the bishop that announces sops for families in the Diocese of Pala with five or more children, invited criticism from various corners.[1][2] A remark from the bishop made on Sept 9, 2021 that Christian girls are falling prey to love jihad and narcotic jihad triggered a controversy in the state of Kerala.[3][4]
change this to
On July 27, 2021 a circular issued by the bishop that announces sops for families in the Diocese of Pala with five or more children, accepted by the faithful .[1][2] A remark from the bishop made on Sept 9, 2021 that Christian girls are falling prey to love jihad and narcotic jihad was proved with recent events happened. Jjosephv ( talk) 03:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
Anon126 (
notify me of responses! /
talk /
contribs)
04:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
CONTROVERSIES UNAVAILABLE TINUMON THOMAS mj ( talk) 04:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The entire Love Jihad controversy section should be removed as the entire topic is an ongoing topic in the news on a statement made by the Bishop. Proponents and opponents are constantly modifying the page (where in one case) a user has made a altogether new Wiki page to further create false claims where the citations he had mentioned in only news channels which has stated what the Bishop has said and has no relation to the authenticity of the facts. Narco Jihad terminology has been in use for more than a decade with the US intelligence and United Nations report on drugs also mentioning the same [1] [2]. Recent arrests made in India where the arrested said the narcotics where being smuggled to destroy the non-muslims were also reported [3].
I suggest the section be removed and article locked in its entirety until the Government of India takes a stance on the matter and is resolved. Pottalogic ( talk) 14:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
14:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)References
@
Br Ibrahim john, the
WP:LEAD literally says It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.
. Where does the policy say lead must be concise?. You haven't explained why you are restoring a poorly sourced version with many unreliable sources in your talk page or in
User:Tayi Arajakate's talk page. I appears that you are attempting to White wash the article of the controversies the subject was involved in. -
SUN EYE 1
08:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. Of course, the lead must be concise. It must be the article in a nutshell. But here it is consuming almost quarter of the article. What's the point in that. And the comments from non notable people like some nuns, and removal of notable comments like that of the Church head, cannot be justified. Meanwhile, a rape case, probably related to Franco Mulackal is unrelated to the person and will be removed. Neutrality in Wikepedia means Wikepedia must not have a pov. Everything that's reliable, both in support and against must be added. Wikepedia must not give its own opinion to the viewers. Br Ibrahim john ( talk) 08:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X Kallarangatt is involved in a number of controversies over covering up of a sexual assault allegation in the Church laid against another bishop,[4][5] providing sops to influence Syro-Malabar Christian women to have four or more children,[6][7] and promoting conspiracy theories such as "love jihad" and "narcotics jihad".[8] He has also been accused of using the love and narcotics jihad controversy as a distraction from the sexual assault and corruption allegations surrounding the Church and to forge an alliance with the Hindutva movement in India, in an effort to prevent corruption investigations from agencies under the Narendra Modi government.[9][10][11]
Y Mar Joseph Kallarangatt heads the Palai diocese of the Syro-Malabar Church, one of the biggest Catholic churches in the state. The diocese is home to the largest concentration of Syro-Malabar Christians in Kerala. Kallarangatt, born in 1956 and ordained as a priest in 1982, is considered a scholar and authority on topics of theology within the Church. He has authored over 30 books. [9]He also alleged that young women, belonging to Christianity and other non-Muslim faiths, were being lured by ‘jihadis’ through ‘love jihad’ and subjected to exploitation, forced religious conversion and terrorist activities.[10]Joseph Kallarangatt is an Indian Catholic prelate and theologian, who is the 3rd Bishop of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Eparchy of Palai.[11]He is currently the chairman of the Syro-Malabar Synodal Commission for Family, Laity and Life and wields enormous clout within the Church. Indian2051 ( talk) 13:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
The article is misleading as a single antagonistic view point filled with hatred is used while making the profile of the bishop. This clearly shows that Wikipedia has been manipulated to harass a minority community and it's local head. Vija!!7 ( talk) 15:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some of the sources are not reliable Kokovosebastiano ( talk) 05:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Remove the reference that Joseph Kallarangatt is involved in the covering up of sexual allegation. The links to the charge sheet against bishop Franco is here: https://www.onmanorama.com/news/kerala/2020/08/13/charge-sheet-nun-rape-case-bishop-franco-mulakkal.html and https://theprint.in/india/police-file-chargesheet-against-bishop-franco-mulakkal-in-kerala-nun-rape-case/219243/ Remove all the erroneous claims in the article that connects joseph Kallarangatt with Bishop Franco mulakkal case Ezhuth ( talk) 09:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Based on tabloid accusation referred in Footnote 7,8 and 9, accusations that are far distant are amassed against Joseph Kallarangatt. violation of BLP rules Ezhuth ( talk) 04:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Ezhuth added a section to the article presenting a more detailed narrative of Kallarangatt's 8 September sermon, but one that generally is redundant to the section already in the article about it. Frankly, my concern is that this is a POV fork preventing a version of events that is more flattering to Kallarangatt. I don't think this editor is acting in bad faith—there has been some outright whitewashing of the article in the past—but I do think this editor can be placed, broadly, in the category of editors who have shown up with the intent of removing negative material from the article or otherwise trying to shine a positive light on the subject.
What material can we take from the new section and integrate into the pre-existing one? — C.Fred ( talk) 14:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The sermon quotes previous events with names of persons involved. How can we change the content of one's sermon Ezhuth ( talk) 20:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
When a particular sermon made by Joseph Kallarangatt becomes controversial for some reason, we should start from the sermons, its context; to be precise every text has context. Joseph Kallarangatt mentioned in his sermon several past and recent events including names that needs to be presented in an article about him. Wikipedia demands "an original interpretation or analysis of a source, or a synthesis of sources" Wikipedia:Libel - Ezhuth ( talk) 20:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
When we deal with a BLP, Wikipedia demands balance of presentation WP:BLPBALANCE The voice of the living person should be presented first of all WP:BLPKINDNESS. Two titles repeating the word "Controversy" and "2021" are in the article: "2018–2021: Controversies in the Church" and "2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy". It seems that term "Controversy" is too much highlighted. A sentence like "On 3 February 2020, Kallarangatt presided over the consecration function for Jose Pulickal's appointment as the 4th Bishop of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Eparchy of Kanjirappally.[15]" is even added under one of these titles. Impartial tone is needed in the presentation WP:BLPSTYLE "2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy" can be edited as "Controversies and reactions after the terms love and narcotic jihad". The content under the title can be retained since it concentrates on the reactions from various angles in the society. Ezhuth ( talk) 18:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLPKINDNESS is an ethics in creating BLP according to Wikipedia; something basic when you handle a living person who have a right to his or her good name. Happy that you don't accuse Wikipedia as a relative of Joseph Kallarangatt Your question in fact, belongs to the category of argumentum ad hominem - Ezhuth ( talk) 20:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
It is applicable if the subject himself/herself is not in the digital circle to comment for himself/herself. Also no attempt is made in the page to blank any writing already published. Nothing is treated as "problematic" and no attempt is made to "blank" it by inappropriate deletion. WP:BLPKINDNESS - Ezhuth ( talk) 20:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
I don't think sermon itself has enough notability to list on the wiki page, the controversy around the speech made on that event is the notable event Abvayad ( talk) 05:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 20:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Allegations are always
opinions, otherwise, it must have PROOF, which makes it fact. Where is the evidence for the allegation [...] using the love and narcotics jihad controversy as a distraction from the sexual assault and corruption allegations surrounding the church and to forge an alliance with the Hindutva movement in India, in an effort to prevent corruption investigations [...]
? When did Wikipedia started publishing
conspiracy theories? Otherwise, provide proof. The three cited sources reports conspiracy theories by collecting "comments" from non-notable individuals, which violates
WP:BIASED and
WP:EXCEPTIONAL. How is that notable? Is this newspaper? They do not even qualify to add with an attribution. It is common when someone makes a controversial allegation, those opposing them makes counter allegations, but stitching those into Wikipedia is not encyclopedic,
WP:NOTADVOCACY and
WP:NOTOPINION. Remove.
117.230.91.62 (
talk)
14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
100 percent agree. Seems like masala content made way into wikipedia articles. Stripedkangaroo ( talk) 13:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Unnecessarily reverting instead of editing any mistakes in the sub section 2021 Love and narcotics jihad controversy leads to suspect foul play and biased edits on a living person. Kindly step back from reverting and choose to make the edits for the better അദ്വൈതൻ ( talk) 12:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
( User talk: FrancisSobieski123)
The Hindutva proponent right wing Bharatiya Janata Party extended its full support to the bishop claiming that he was revealing the "truth" of a widespread conspiracy that everyone else was trying to hide, several senior state functionaries of the party visited him at his residence after the protests. Joseph Perumthottam, the Archbishop of his ecclesiastical province, Changanacherry had also granted his support to Kallarangatt. He endorsed the bishop through an article in the church controlled newspaper Deepika.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to request an addition to this article stating the contribution of Mar Joseph Kallarangattu in the establishment of a Quaternary care center called "Mar Sleeva Medicity". Also, I want to suggest an additional sentence stating that Bishop Mulakkal has been acquitted by the sessions court. FrancisSobieski123 ( talk) 00:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to request an addition to this article stating the contribution of Mar Joseph Kallarangattu in the establishment of a Quaternary care center called "Mar Sleeva Medicity". Also, I want to suggest an additional sentence stating that Bishop Mulakkal has been acquitted by the sessions court. FrancisSobieski123 ( talk) 11:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
This page Joseph Kallarangatt significantly violates WP:NPOV under the section Pastoral Ministry. അദ്വൈതൻ ( talk) 18:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
as of latest revision [2]
It was criticised for ignoring the large population boom in India and for going against the existent two-child norm in Kerala, the critics from within the Syro-Malabar community described it as an unethical and immoral scheme created for petty political gains and as interference in the sexual lives of married couples by unmarried clergy
The remarks attracted immediate and widespread condemnation from within the Christian community. [2]
From within the Syro-Malabar Church, the former spokesman of the Synod, Father Paul Thelakkat criticised Kallarangatt
former spokesperson,
within Syro Malabarthe context is ought to be included.
The Kerala Catholic Bishops' Council (KCBC) in which Kallarangatt and Perumthottam held influential positions released a statement…
In essence, this section of article gives a negative image all with the criticism of the Bishop while in reality equal and positive side exits(with reliable sources) are are left out. അദ്വൈതൻ ( talk) 17:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)