Joint Agency Coordination Centre has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 19, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Joint Agency Coordination Centre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Joint Agency Coordination Centre appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 23 March 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This is just a note, not really a topic for discussion. The organisational chart for the DIRD in August 2014 ( internet archive...the only archived version of the PDF webpage available before my save today, 18 March) does not include the JACC, although it is included in the 10 March 2015 version. This doesn't have any significance, it's clear the JACC was established within the DIRD in March 2014, but I just thought it's worth noting on this talk page. AHeneen ( talk) 00:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I suppose there is now no need for any mention of the flaperon find on this page? 220 of Borg 05:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase ( talk · contribs) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
On it.
Zwerg Nase (
talk) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
This is quite close to GA, the following things need to be taken care of:
That's about it. Good work so far! I am placing the review on hold for seven days. Zwerg Nase ( talk) 21:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joint Agency Coordination Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Joint Agency Coordination Centre has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 19, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Joint Agency Coordination Centre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Joint Agency Coordination Centre appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 23 March 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This is just a note, not really a topic for discussion. The organisational chart for the DIRD in August 2014 ( internet archive...the only archived version of the PDF webpage available before my save today, 18 March) does not include the JACC, although it is included in the 10 March 2015 version. This doesn't have any significance, it's clear the JACC was established within the DIRD in March 2014, but I just thought it's worth noting on this talk page. AHeneen ( talk) 00:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I suppose there is now no need for any mention of the flaperon find on this page? 220 of Borg 05:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase ( talk · contribs) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
On it.
Zwerg Nase (
talk) 08:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
This is quite close to GA, the following things need to be taken care of:
That's about it. Good work so far! I am placing the review on hold for seven days. Zwerg Nase ( talk) 21:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joint Agency Coordination Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)