GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hchc2009 ( talk · contribs) 15:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
I'll read through and begin the review proper tomorrow.
Hchc2009 (
talk)
15:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Well-written:
(a) the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
Factually accurate and verifiable:
(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
(c) it contains no original research.
Broad in its coverage:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by images:
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Did all I can with the pictures. Anything else? Godzilladude123 ( talk) 09:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Restructured the sentence and added better references that would source the topics you have listed. Godzilladude123 ( talk) 08:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Fixed, except for the part of the ranchers and farmers ditto. Those two were equal victims from using the land and water rights. Godzilladude123 ( talk) 04:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
if the images are the problems we can just remove it. They were uploaded probably a decade ago and the uploader cant be reached. 112.198.64.40 ( talk) 08:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hchc2009 ( talk · contribs) 15:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
I'll read through and begin the review proper tomorrow.
Hchc2009 (
talk)
15:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Well-written:
(a) the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct;
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
Factually accurate and verifiable:
(a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;
(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
(c) it contains no original research.
Broad in its coverage:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by images:
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Did all I can with the pictures. Anything else? Godzilladude123 ( talk) 09:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Restructured the sentence and added better references that would source the topics you have listed. Godzilladude123 ( talk) 08:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Fixed, except for the part of the ranchers and farmers ditto. Those two were equal victims from using the land and water rights. Godzilladude123 ( talk) 04:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
if the images are the problems we can just remove it. They were uploaded probably a decade ago and the uploader cant be reached. 112.198.64.40 ( talk) 08:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)