John W. Campbell Memorial Award for Best Science Fiction Novel is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Today" i revised this article heavily. Substantially i relied almost entirely on the Center for SFStudies, mainly one complex webpage. Scope and arrangement i have mainly learned from numerous awards articles here, and disseminated to others.
Here are some leftovers.
-- P64 ( talk) 21:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
This list has a problem with notability. None of the sources are usable for establishing notability. They are primary references or connected to the subject (U of K) or a reference to another encyclopedia. There are no multiple reliable secondary sources per WP:GNG. I'm surprised it passed the FLC much less someone hasn't nominated it for WP:AfD. -- Green Cardamom ( talk) 15:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Article is still based mostly on primary sources. See WP:PRIMARY (policy) which says "Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them." What's needed are secondary sources for at least some of the yearly awards. -- Green C 23:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of John W. Campbell Memorial Award for Best Science Fiction Novel's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Loc19":
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
John W. Campbell Memorial Award for Best Science Fiction Novel is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Today" i revised this article heavily. Substantially i relied almost entirely on the Center for SFStudies, mainly one complex webpage. Scope and arrangement i have mainly learned from numerous awards articles here, and disseminated to others.
Here are some leftovers.
-- P64 ( talk) 21:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
This list has a problem with notability. None of the sources are usable for establishing notability. They are primary references or connected to the subject (U of K) or a reference to another encyclopedia. There are no multiple reliable secondary sources per WP:GNG. I'm surprised it passed the FLC much less someone hasn't nominated it for WP:AfD. -- Green Cardamom ( talk) 15:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Article is still based mostly on primary sources. See WP:PRIMARY (policy) which says "Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them." What's needed are secondary sources for at least some of the yearly awards. -- Green C 23:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of John W. Campbell Memorial Award for Best Science Fiction Novel's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Loc19":
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)