This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is
related to the British Library. Please copy assessments of the article from the most relevant WikiProject template to this one as needed.British LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/British LibraryTemplate:WikiProject British LibraryBritish Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Barrett L. Beer's biography of Stow disagreees about his father's profession, making him a tallow-chandler, rather than a tailor. Beer is well-researched and recent, so I am changing the text accordingly. Please correct me if there is a better source!
Bluewave13:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)reply
The current Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/26611 says he died on 5 April; the Latin inscription on the monument in St Andrew Undershaft Church say 'obiit Aetatis anno 80, die 5 Aprilis 1605'. I believe DNB takes precedence over Notable Names Database as a reliable source. I am reverting the recent change. But if someone can come up with a reliable source that discusses the date and concludes that the monument his wife set up for him in the church has the wrong date on, I'd be happy to see the article changed.
John O'London (
talk)
16:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Agree with
John O'London. The old Dictionary of National Biography (published 1898) gave the date as 6 April, and is probably the source (directly or indirectly) of that date in NNDB and elsewhere. However, the DNB has now been superseded by the ODNB (published 2004); and the evidence of the inscription (which I can't see has ever been challenged) would appear to be definitive.
GrindtXX (
talk)
17:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Thanks for adding the link to Kingsford, GrindtXX - Kingsford quotes the inscription, of course. I wonder why the old DNB said 6 April. I must have a look at the inscription sometime and see if there's any chance it's been changed.
John O'London (
talk)
17:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is
related to the British Library. Please copy assessments of the article from the most relevant WikiProject template to this one as needed.British LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/British LibraryTemplate:WikiProject British LibraryBritish Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Barrett L. Beer's biography of Stow disagreees about his father's profession, making him a tallow-chandler, rather than a tailor. Beer is well-researched and recent, so I am changing the text accordingly. Please correct me if there is a better source!
Bluewave13:11, 19 October 2005 (UTC)reply
The current Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/26611 says he died on 5 April; the Latin inscription on the monument in St Andrew Undershaft Church say 'obiit Aetatis anno 80, die 5 Aprilis 1605'. I believe DNB takes precedence over Notable Names Database as a reliable source. I am reverting the recent change. But if someone can come up with a reliable source that discusses the date and concludes that the monument his wife set up for him in the church has the wrong date on, I'd be happy to see the article changed.
John O'London (
talk)
16:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Agree with
John O'London. The old Dictionary of National Biography (published 1898) gave the date as 6 April, and is probably the source (directly or indirectly) of that date in NNDB and elsewhere. However, the DNB has now been superseded by the ODNB (published 2004); and the evidence of the inscription (which I can't see has ever been challenged) would appear to be definitive.
GrindtXX (
talk)
17:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Thanks for adding the link to Kingsford, GrindtXX - Kingsford quotes the inscription, of course. I wonder why the old DNB said 6 April. I must have a look at the inscription sometime and see if there's any chance it's been changed.
John O'London (
talk)
17:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)reply