The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Comment: just a drive by, but with no images, it is difficult to pass to GA. There would need to be a very good reason that there was no image. I understand the difficulty with images with this one, as there are no images of him directly. Perhaps one of the images at
Hanged, drawn and quartered? Or the painting at the top of
Battle of Pontvallain. This second one was previously removed, but much of his life hinged on the fact that he fled from this battle, so I'm not sure why it should not be included (with the right caption). — Insertcleverphrasehere(
or here)18:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Uh-uh... the caption would have to be "Picture of a battle which Minsterworth wasn't at." I'm sorry you were keen its insertion; other images may well be available (I'm looking for a surviving charter atm) In any case, per
the criteria, the presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement(my emph). Thanks though.
>SerialNumber54129...speculates19:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Yes, the lede was a bit of a give away wasn't it ;)
I've banged one out for you. As for the IB; I think Ill leave that for a bit. Apart from a date of death, nationality, and his not fighting in a particular battle, I don't think it would have much to say. One of those silly ones with two lines in it!
>SerialNumber54129...speculates01:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Lead and infobox;
Mention the "United Kingdom" following Gloucestershire.
Nothing is known of his early life or upbringing (even, it seems, to the extent of when he was knighted or by whom). but he first comes to prominence in the 1370 invasion of France -> Nothing much is known Minsterworth's life before 1370 invasion of France.
many years' earlier; earlier to what?
by this "that" time
The war in France, although it continued under the command of the King's son, Edward the Black Prince, was going poorly -> The war in France was going poorly under the command of the King's son, Edward the Black Prince.
Fernch army; fix the typo, and also link it
to Brittany-narrowly avoiding -> to Brittany, narrowly avoiding
@
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for this. I've addressed most of the issues you raise (couple of sentence tweaks apart); but, in the course of doing so, I have now expanded the article by some 10,000 bytes. I'm not sure how that impacts on the review you've already done, or perhaps not. Cheers,
>SerialNumber54129...speculates20:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The more reviewers the better the article will be. But of course this is Krishna's review, and the final outcome is down to him.
EricCorbett19:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Comment: just a drive by, but with no images, it is difficult to pass to GA. There would need to be a very good reason that there was no image. I understand the difficulty with images with this one, as there are no images of him directly. Perhaps one of the images at
Hanged, drawn and quartered? Or the painting at the top of
Battle of Pontvallain. This second one was previously removed, but much of his life hinged on the fact that he fled from this battle, so I'm not sure why it should not be included (with the right caption). — Insertcleverphrasehere(
or here)18:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Uh-uh... the caption would have to be "Picture of a battle which Minsterworth wasn't at." I'm sorry you were keen its insertion; other images may well be available (I'm looking for a surviving charter atm) In any case, per
the criteria, the presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement(my emph). Thanks though.
>SerialNumber54129...speculates19:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Yes, the lede was a bit of a give away wasn't it ;)
I've banged one out for you. As for the IB; I think Ill leave that for a bit. Apart from a date of death, nationality, and his not fighting in a particular battle, I don't think it would have much to say. One of those silly ones with two lines in it!
>SerialNumber54129...speculates01:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Lead and infobox;
Mention the "United Kingdom" following Gloucestershire.
Nothing is known of his early life or upbringing (even, it seems, to the extent of when he was knighted or by whom). but he first comes to prominence in the 1370 invasion of France -> Nothing much is known Minsterworth's life before 1370 invasion of France.
many years' earlier; earlier to what?
by this "that" time
The war in France, although it continued under the command of the King's son, Edward the Black Prince, was going poorly -> The war in France was going poorly under the command of the King's son, Edward the Black Prince.
Fernch army; fix the typo, and also link it
to Brittany-narrowly avoiding -> to Brittany, narrowly avoiding
@
Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for this. I've addressed most of the issues you raise (couple of sentence tweaks apart); but, in the course of doing so, I have now expanded the article by some 10,000 bytes. I'm not sure how that impacts on the review you've already done, or perhaps not. Cheers,
>SerialNumber54129...speculates20:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The more reviewers the better the article will be. But of course this is Krishna's review, and the final outcome is down to him.
EricCorbett19:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)reply