John Millner was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PrairieKid ( talk · contribs) 04:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I will review this nomination. I should be able to begin my review with initial thoughts tomorrow today.
PrairieKid (
talk)
04:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This article does not yet meet the criteria... With some hesitance, I am putting it on hold.
OK- The necessary changes are:
Good things to add (not required by any means are):
A reminder- once more is put into the article, the intro should also be expanded.
In all honesty, I think this is one of those articles that simply does not have the potential to become a GA. I don't want to be pessimistic and I certainly came in hopeful. A lot of work needs to be done. I'll be back on June 26th to check in again, if not sooner. PrairieKid ( talk) 21:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately I cannot find additional sources to expand the article. However, I can continue to copyedit my text. Would that be sufficient? Edge3 ( talk) 03:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
John Millner was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PrairieKid ( talk · contribs) 04:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I will review this nomination. I should be able to begin my review with initial thoughts tomorrow today.
PrairieKid (
talk)
04:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
This article does not yet meet the criteria... With some hesitance, I am putting it on hold.
OK- The necessary changes are:
Good things to add (not required by any means are):
A reminder- once more is put into the article, the intro should also be expanded.
In all honesty, I think this is one of those articles that simply does not have the potential to become a GA. I don't want to be pessimistic and I certainly came in hopeful. A lot of work needs to be done. I'll be back on June 26th to check in again, if not sooner. PrairieKid ( talk) 21:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately I cannot find additional sources to expand the article. However, I can continue to copyedit my text. Would that be sufficient? Edge3 ( talk) 03:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)